REVIEW 3 cited by
AI Governance and Accountability: An Analysis of Anthropic's Claude
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
As AI systems become increasingly prevalent and impactful, the need for effective AI governance and accountability measures is paramount. This paper examines the AI governance landscape, focusing on Anthropic's Claude, a foundational AI model. We analyze Claude through the lens of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and the EU AI Act, identifying potential threats and proposing mitigation strategies. The paper highlights the importance of transparency, rigorous benchmarking, and comprehensive data handling processes in ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AI systems. We conclude by discussing the social impact of AI governance and the ethical considerations surrounding AI accountability.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TextGaze: Prompting Gaze Target Estimation with Textual Scene Cues
TextGaze fuses LVLM-generated textual cues of appearance, action and gaze direction with DINOv2 features via a hierarchically supervised transformer to estimate gaze heatmaps and in/out status.
-
SafeLawBench: Towards Safe Alignment of Large Language Models
SafeLawBench introduces a legal-safety taxonomy and 25,966 tasks on which 20 LLMs average 68.8% accuracy and the best model, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, reaches 80.5%.
-
Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents
A position paper defines the Agentic Web as the next web era and proposes a three-dimensional conceptual framework for understanding and building it.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.