Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Can Large Language Models Improve the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Neural Networks?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08685 v3 pith:TPUFDBHJ submitted 2024-08-16 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYcs.SI

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYcs.SI
keywords gnnsgraphllmsrobustnessadversarialcapabilitiesimproveinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, especially for topology perturbations, and many methods that improve the robustness of GNNs have received considerable attention. Recently, we have witnessed the significant success of large language models (LLMs), leading many to explore the great potential of LLMs on GNNs. However, they mainly focus on improving the performance of GNNs by utilizing LLMs to enhance the node features. Therefore, we ask: Will the robustness of GNNs also be enhanced with the powerful understanding and inference capabilities of LLMs? By presenting the empirical results, we find that despite that LLMs can improve the robustness of GNNs, there is still an average decrease of 23.1% in accuracy, implying that the GNNs remain extremely vulnerable against topology attacks. Therefore, another question is how to extend the capabilities of LLMs on graph adversarial robustness. In this paper, we propose an LLM-based robust graph structure inference framework, LLM4RGNN, which distills the inference capabilities of GPT-4 into a local LLM for identifying malicious edges and an LM-based edge predictor for finding missing important edges, so as to recover a robust graph structure. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LLM4RGNN consistently improves the robustness across various GNNs. Even in some cases where the perturbation ratio increases to 40%, the accuracy of GNNs is still better than that on the clean graph. The source code can be found in https://github.com/zhongjian-zhang/LLM4RGNN.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When LLM Agents Meet Graph Optimization: An Automated Data Quality Improvement Approach

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    LAGA is a unified multi-agent LLM framework that automates comprehensive quality optimization for text-attributed graphs by running detection, planning, action, and evaluation agents in a closed loop.

  2. OpenRTAG: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Text-Attributed Graph Learning under Data Quality Degradation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OpenRTAG is a benchmark that organizes text-attributed-graph data-quality issues into a 3x3 taxonomy (text/structure/label by sparsity/noise/imbalance) and evaluates model robustness across nine datasets and three tasks.

  3. REAL-IoT: Characterizing GNN Intrusion Detection Robustness under Practical Adversarial Attack

    cs.CR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    GNN-based intrusion detectors show lower accuracy on REAL-IoT's merged datasets, but the paper's own tables are inconsistent and the drift protocol is not a true distribution-shift test.

  4. Poster: Enhancing GNN Robustness for Network Intrusion Detection via Agent-based Analysis

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM agents that filter suspicious nodes before a GNN classifier restore clean-level accuracy on a synthetic node injection attack.

Pith tools