Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Batch Policy Learning under Constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.08738 v1 pith:TUF7WCOG submitted 2019-03-20 cs.LG cs.AImath.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AImath.OCstat.ML
keywords constraintslearningbatchpolicydifferentdomainsdrivingmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When learning policies for real-world domains, two important questions arise: (i) how to efficiently use pre-collected off-policy, non-optimal behavior data; and (ii) how to mediate among different competing objectives and constraints. We thus study the problem of batch policy learning under multiple constraints, and offer a systematic solution. We first propose a flexible meta-algorithm that admits any batch reinforcement learning and online learning procedure as subroutines. We then present a specific algorithmic instantiation and provide performance guarantees for the main objective and all constraints. To certify constraint satisfaction, we propose a new and simple method for off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) and derive PAC-style bounds. Our algorithm achieves strong empirical results in different domains, including in a challenging problem of simulated car driving subject to multiple constraints such as lane keeping and smooth driving. We also show experimentally that our OPE method outperforms other popular OPE techniques on a standalone basis, especially in a high-dimensional setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CANDOR: Counterfactual ANnotated DOubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using imperfect counterfactual annotations only in the reward model part of a doubly robust estimator is the theoretically and empirically safest way to incorporate them.

Pith tools