Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass Stochastic Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.08306 v1 pith:TYQTYRV6 submitted 2025-05-13 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass Stochastic Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization

classification cs.LG math.OCstat.ML
keywords sqrtstochasticlossmulti-passout-of-sampleoverfittingpasspopulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study the out-of-sample performance of multi-pass stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in the fundamental stochastic convex optimization (SCO) model. While one-pass SGD is known to achieve an optimal $\Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$ excess population loss given a sample of size $n$, much less is understood about the multi-pass version of the algorithm which is widely used in practice. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that in the general non-smooth case of SCO, just a few epochs of SGD can already hurt its out-of-sample performance significantly and lead to overfitting. In particular, using a step size $\eta = \Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$, which gives the optimal rate after one pass, can lead to population loss as large as $\Omega(1)$ after just one additional pass. More generally, we show that the population loss from the second pass onward is of the order $\Theta(1/(\eta T) + \eta \sqrt{T})$, where $T$ is the total number of steps. These results reveal a certain phase-transition in the out-of-sample behavior of SGD after the first epoch, as well as a sharp separation between the rates of overfitting in the smooth and non-smooth cases of SCO. Additionally, we extend our results to with-replacement SGD, proving that the same asymptotic bounds hold after $O(n \log n)$ steps. Finally, we also prove a lower bound of $\Omega(\eta \sqrt{n})$ on the generalization gap of one-pass SGD in dimension $d = \smash{\widetilde O}(n)$, improving on recent results of Koren et al.(2022) and Schliserman et al.(2024).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mirror Descent Beyond Euclidean Stability: An Exponential Separation in Initialization Sensitivity

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    Non-quadratic Mirror Descent exhibits exponential initialization sensitivity in convex settings, shown via 3D constructions and KL-regularized simplex examples, with Bregman anchoring proposed for stabilization.

  2. Flat Minima and Generalization: Insights from Stochastic Convex Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    In smooth stochastic convex optimization, flat empirical minima can incur constant population risk while sharp minima generalize optimally, and sharpness-aware algorithms can converge to such bad flat minima.