Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim It

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.08188 v1 pith:U3TKJG6H submitted 2024-07-11 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords datasetsdiversitydatasetimplicationsresearchsocialtermsvalue-laden
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning (ML) datasets, often perceived as neutral, inherently encapsulate abstract and disputed social constructs. Dataset curators frequently employ value-laden terms such as diversity, bias, and quality to characterize datasets. Despite their prevalence, these terms lack clear definitions and validation. Our research explores the implications of this issue by analyzing "diversity" across 135 image and text datasets. Drawing from social sciences, we apply principles from measurement theory to identify considerations and offer recommendations for conceptualizing, operationalizing, and evaluating diversity in datasets. Our findings have broader implications for ML research, advocating for a more nuanced and precise approach to handling value-laden properties in dataset construction.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Valid Measurement Of (Un)fairness For Generative AI: A Proposal For Systematization Through The Lens Of Fair Equality of Chances

    cs.CY 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Fair Equality of Chances-based framework decomposes GenAI unfairness into harms/benefits, morally arbitrary factors, and morally decisive factors to improve measurement validity.

  2. Understanding and Meeting Practitioner Needs When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Practitioners trying to measure representational harms in LLM-based systems often cannot use public measurement instruments, either because the instruments lack validity, specificity, interpretability, or actionabilit...

Pith tools