Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data: Application to Fraud Detection and Imbalanced Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.08030 v1 pith:U4H4WE6J submitted 2021-01-20 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords adversarialdataattacksdetectionfraudtabularappliedexamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Guaranteeing the security of transactional systems is a crucial priority of all institutions that process transactions, in order to protect their businesses against cyberattacks and fraudulent attempts. Adversarial attacks are novel techniques that, other than being proven to be effective to fool image classification models, can also be applied to tabular data. Adversarial attacks aim at producing adversarial examples, in other words, slightly modified inputs that induce the Artificial Intelligence (AI) system to return incorrect outputs that are advantageous for the attacker. In this paper we illustrate a novel approach to modify and adapt state-of-the-art algorithms to imbalanced tabular data, in the context of fraud detection. Experimental results show that the proposed modifications lead to a perfect attack success rate, obtaining adversarial examples that are also less perceptible when analyzed by humans. Moreover, when applied to a real-world production system, the proposed techniques shows the possibility of posing a serious threat to the robustness of advanced AI-based fraud detection procedures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 14 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. MUSE: Model-Agnostic Tabular Watermarking via Multi-Sample Selection

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MUSE embeds a watermark in tabular synthetic data by selecting, among several generated candidate rows, the one with the highest keyed hash score, enabling detection without model inversion.

  2. Addressing Key Challenges of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in the Tabular Domain: A Methodological Framework for Coherence and Consistency

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Class-conditional anomaly detection and SHAP-based consistency checks provide a new way to score the quality of tabular adversarial samples, and a seven-attack comparison shows transferability-based attacks are the ha...

  3. On the Validity of Traditional Vulnerability Scoring Systems for Adversarial Attacks against LLMs

    cs.CR 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying CVSS, DREAD, OWASP, and SSVC to 56 adversarial LLM attacks via three LLM judges yields near-constant factor scores, which the authors take as evidence that these metrics cannot differentiate LLM attacks.

Pith tools