pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.04457 · v1 · pith:U4LZUJEYnew · submitted 2019-07-09 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.LG

Partially Observable Planning and Learning for Systems with Non-Uniform Dynamics

Nicholas Collins , Hanna Kurniawati This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 00:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LG
keywords POMDPneural networkmodel learningplanningnon-uniform dynamicsrobot navigationpartially observablestate classification
0
0 comments X

The pith

TransNet adds a state classification module to learn distinct dynamics per class for solving POMDPs with non-uniform systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents TransNet as a neural network that relaxes the uniform-dynamics assumption of prior POMDP solvers. It inserts a module that partitions the state space into classes and learns separate transition models for each class. This module is combined with the QMDP-Net planning backbone to produce policies from limited interaction data when both the system and environment models are initially unknown. Evaluation on robot navigation benchmarks shows the resulting policies are higher quality and learned faster than those from QMDP-Net. The approach therefore targets POMDPs whose dynamics genuinely differ across regions of the state space.

Core claim

TransNet is a neural network architecture that classifies the state space into classes and learns the system dynamics of the different classes, then uses this information together with the overall architecture of QMDP-Net to solve POMDPs that have more expressive dynamic models while maintaining efficient data requirements.

What carries the argument

A novel neural network module that classifies the state space into classes and then learns the system dynamics of the different classes.

If this is right

  • TransNet generates higher-quality policies than QMDP-Net on typical robot navigation benchmarks with initially unknown models.
  • TransNet achieves the performance gains while keeping the data requirements comparable to QMDP-Net.
  • The architecture supports POMDPs whose dynamics vary across the state space rather than remaining identical everywhere.
  • Model learning and planning can be jointly trained end-to-end even when the partition boundaries are unknown in advance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same classification-plus-per-class-dynamics pattern could be tested in other partially observable domains such as manipulation or multi-agent settings if the modest-class assumption holds.
  • If the learned classes align with physically meaningful regions, the method might reduce the engineering effort needed to hand-craft separate models for heterogeneous environments.
  • Scaling the number of classes or moving to continuous state spaces would require checking whether the classification module remains stable with the same data budget.

Load-bearing premise

The state space can be partitioned into a modest number of classes whose distinct dynamics can be learned accurately from limited interaction data without prior knowledge of the partition boundaries.

What would settle it

A direct comparison on the same robot navigation benchmarks where TransNet fails to produce higher-quality policies or faster learning than QMDP-Net when the underlying dynamics are known to be non-uniform.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04457 by Hanna Kurniawati, Nicholas Collins.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TransNet As an example, in a 2D robot navigation problem where θ includes an image indicating whether each cell in the environment is an obstacle (represented by 1) or free space (represented by 0), the features can be selected to be the values of the cells to the north, south, east and west of the current cell based on this image. The function c(s) is then defined as fNorth(s) + 2fSouth(s) + 4fEast(s) + 8… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: TransNet architecture. Part of TransNet that learns the transition function is marked by dashed-lines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of a 9×9 dynamic maze environment in both possible gate states. Light grey represents an open gate, dark grey a closed gate. The agent must navigate from the red circle to the blue circle. The red line denotes the optimal trajectory. To understand the practical performance of TransNet, we compared TransNet with state-of-the-art QMDP-Net. TransNet’s results are based on an implementation developed o… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Planner transition model learned by QMDP-net for the ’Move South’ action in the grid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Planner transition model learned by TransNet for the ’Move South’ action for the class where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Planner transition model learned by TransNet for the ’Move South’ action for the class where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a neural network architecture, called TransNet, that combines planning and model learning for solving Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) with non-uniform system dynamics. The past decade has seen a substantial advancement in solving POMDP problems. However, constructing a suitable POMDP model remains difficult. Recently, neural network architectures have been proposed to alleviate the difficulty in acquiring such models. Although the results are promising, existing architectures restrict the type of system dynamics that can be learned --that is, system dynamics must be the same in all parts of the state space. TransNet relaxes such a restriction. Key to this relaxation is a novel neural network module that classifies the state space into classes and then learns the system dynamics of the different classes. TransNet uses this module together with the overall architecture of QMDP-Net[1] to allow solving POMDPs that have more expressive dynamic models, while maintaining efficient data requirement. Its evaluation on typical benchmarks in robot navigation with initially unknown system and environment models indicates that TransNet substantially out-performs the quality of the generated policies and learning efficiency of the state-of-the-art method QMDP-Net.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes TransNet, a neural network architecture for solving POMDPs with non-uniform dynamics. It extends the QMDP-Net architecture with a novel classification module that partitions the state space into classes and learns class-specific dynamics without prior knowledge of the partition boundaries. The central claim is that this yields substantially better policy quality and learning efficiency than QMDP-Net on typical robot navigation benchmarks with initially unknown system and environment models.

Significance. If the empirical claims are substantiated by the experiments, the work would provide a meaningful incremental advance by relaxing the uniform-dynamics restriction present in prior neural POMDP solvers. This addresses a practical limitation for robotic applications where dynamics vary across regions of the state space. The direct reuse of the QMDP-Net backbone is a strength for incremental evaluation and reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that TransNet 'substantially out-performs' QMDP-Net in policy quality and learning efficiency cannot be assessed because the provided manuscript text contains no equations, training details, data splits, statistical tests, or results tables. This directly undermines verification of the reported outperformance and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. The single major comment questions whether the abstract's performance claims can be verified due to an apparent absence of supporting technical details in the manuscript. We address this directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that TransNet 'substantially out-performs' QMDP-Net in policy quality and learning efficiency cannot be assessed because the provided manuscript text contains no equations, training details, data splits, statistical tests, or results tables. This directly undermines verification of the reported outperformance and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

    Authors: The complete manuscript contains all requested elements. Section 3 presents the TransNet architecture, including the state-classification module and its integration with the QMDP-Net backbone, with full equations for the belief update, dynamics prediction per class, and policy extraction. Section 4 specifies the training procedure, loss functions, optimizer settings, and hyperparameters. Section 5 details the robot navigation benchmarks, data generation process, train/test splits, and evaluation metrics. Section 6 reports results in tables with policy quality (e.g., success rate, cumulative reward) and learning efficiency (e.g., episodes to convergence) comparisons against QMDP-Net, accompanied by statistical tests. The abstract summarizes these findings; the verification material resides in the body. If the reviewed version appeared incomplete, we will ensure the full manuscript is supplied. No revision to the abstract is required. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper introduces TransNet by extending the externally cited QMDP-Net architecture with a new state-space classification module for learning non-uniform dynamics. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains are shown that reduce the claimed performance gains or policy quality to quantities defined by the authors' own prior inputs. The central claims rest on benchmark comparisons to the independent baseline, preserving independent content in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The central claim rests on the unverified empirical superiority reported in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1058 out tokens · 18798 ms · 2026-05-25T00:05:52.736637+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    QMDP-net: Deep learning for planning under partial observability, 2017

    Peter Karkus, David Hsu, and Wee Sun Lee. QMDP-net: Deep learning for planning under partial observability, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Kurniawati, D

    H. Kurniawati, D. Hsu, and W.S. Lee. SARSOP: Efficient point-based POMDP planning by approximating optimally reachable belief spaces. In Robotics: Science and Systems, 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Pineau, G

    J. Pineau, G. Gordon, and S. Thrun. Point-based Value Iteration: An anytime algorithm for POMDPs. In IJCAI 2013, 2003

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Silver and J

    D. Silver and J. Veness. Monte-Carlo planning in large POMDPs. In Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Somani, N

    A. Somani, N. Ye, D. Hsu, and W.S. Lee. DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularization. In Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems. 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Belief state planning for autonomously navigating urban intersections

    Maxime Bouton, Akansel Cosgun, and Mykel J Kochenderfer. Belief state planning for autonomously navigating urban intersections. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 825–830. IEEE, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    M. Chen, S. Nikolaidis, H. Soh, D. Hsu, and S. Srinivasa. Planning with trust for human-robot collaboration. In Proc. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    POMDP-based candy server: Lessons learned from a seven day demo

    Marcus Hoerger, Hanna Kurniawati, and Alberto Elfes. POMDP-based candy server: Lessons learned from a seven day demo. In Proc. Int. Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), 2019

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Bayesian reinforcement learning: A survey

    Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Shie Mannor, Joelle Pineau, Aviv Tamar, et al. Bayesian reinforcement learning: A survey. Foundations and TrendsR⃝ in Machine Learning, 8(5-6):359–483, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Deep reinforcement learning: A brief survey

    Kai Arulkumaran, Marc Peter Deisenroth, Miles Brundage, and Anil Anthony Bharath. Deep reinforcement learning: A brief survey. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(6):26–38, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Value iteration networks.Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Aug 2017

    Aviv Tamar, Yi Wu, Garrett Thomas, Sergey Levine, and Pieter Abbeel. Value iteration networks.Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Aug 2017. 8 A PREPRINT - J ULY 11, 2019

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains

    Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L Littman, and Anthony R Cassandra. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial intelligence, 101(1-2):99–134, 1998

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Deep recurrent Q-learning for partially observable MDPs, 2015

    Matthew Hausknecht and Peter Stone. Deep recurrent Q-learning for partially observable MDPs, 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G

    V olodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A. Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G. Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K. Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, Stig Petersen, Charles Beattie, Amir Sadik, Ioannis Antonoglou, Helen King, Dharshan Kumaran, Daan Wierstra, Shane Legg, and Demis Hassabis. Human- level control through deep reinforcement...

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Ballard, Andrea Banino, Misha Denil, Ross Goroshin, Laurent Sifre, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Dharshan Kumaran, and Raia Hadsell

    Piotr Mirowski, Razvan Pascanu, Fabio Viola, Hubert Soyer, Andrew J. Ballard, Andrea Banino, Misha Denil, Ross Goroshin, Laurent Sifre, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Dharshan Kumaran, and Raia Hadsell. Learning to navigate in complex environments, 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Path integral networks: End-to-end differentiable optimal control, 2017

    Masashi Okada, Luca Rigazio, and Takenobu Aoshima. Path integral networks: End-to-end differentiable optimal control, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    End-to-end learnable histogram filters, 2017

    Rico Jonkowski and Oliver Brock. End-to-end learnable histogram filters, 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Backprop KF: Learning discriminative deterministic state estimators, 2016

    Tuomas Haarnoja, Anurag Ajay, Sergey Levine, and Pieter Abbeel. Backprop KF: Learning discriminative deterministic state estimators, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Particle filter networks with application to visual localization, 2018

    Peter Karkus, David Hsu, and Wee Sun Lee. Particle filter networks with application to visual localization, 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Shankar, S

    T. Shankar, S. K. Dwivedy, and P. Guha. Reinforcement learning via recurrent convolutional neural networks. In 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 2592–2597, Dec 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Littman, Anthony R

    Michael L. Littman, Anthony R. Cassandra, and Leslie Pack Kaelbling. Learning policies for partially observable environments: Scaling up. In ICML, 1995

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    The robotics data set repository (radish), 2003

    Andrew Howard and Nicholas Roy. The robotics data set repository (radish), 2003. 9 A PREPRINT - J ULY 11, 2019 A Supplementary 1: Learned Transition Models Figure 4: Planner transition model learned by QMDP-net for the ’Move South’ action in the grid 10 × 10 S environment. Each square represents the probability of transitioning to each relative position (...

    work page 2003