Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fast and Accurate Sensitivity Estimation for Continuous-Gravitational-Wave Searches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.02459 v1 pith:UA3FRHHY submitted 2018-08-07 gr-qc

Fast and Accurate Sensitivity Estimation for Continuous-Gravitational-Wave Searches

classification gr-qc
keywords estimatelimitssearchesupperpublishedsensitivitycontinuous-gravitational-wavedetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper presents an efficient numerical sensitivity-estimation method and implementation for continuous-gravitational-wave searches, extending and generalizing an earlier analytic approach by Wette [1]. This estimation framework applies to a broad class of F-statistic-based search meth- ods, namely (i) semi-coherent StackSlide F-statistic (single-stage and hierarchical multi-stage), (ii) Hough number count on F-statistics, as well as (iii) Bayesian upper limits on (coherent or semi-coherent) F-statistic search results. We test this estimate against results from Monte-Carlo simulations assuming Gaussian noise. We find the agreement to be within a few % at high (i.e. low false-alarm) detection thresholds, with increasing deviations at decreasing (i.e. higher false- alarm) detection thresholds, which can be understood in terms of the approximations used in the estimate. We also provide an extensive summary of sensitivity depths achieved in past continuous- gravitational-wave searches (derived from the published upper limits). For the F-statistic-based searches where our sensitivity estimate is applicable, we find an average relative deviation to the published upper limits of less than 10%, which in most cases includes systematic uncertainty about the noise-floor estimate used in the published upper limits.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First Overtone Mode in the Ringdown Signal of GW231028

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    The ringdown of GW231028 contains evidence for the 221 first overtone mode alongside the dominant 220 mode, with a Bayes factor of 193 at 10M after the peak.