Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

YSGAG: The Ideal Substrate for YIG in Quantum Magnonics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read YIG films on the new diamagnetic substrate YSGAG keep their low magnetic damping from room temperature down to 30 millikelvin, with α = 4.29 × 10⁻⁵ at 300 K and no low-temperature upturn. If correct, this removes the substrate-induced dissi

desk verdict Useful materials result: YIG on the new diamagnetic YSGAG substrate keeps FMR damping low down to 30 mK, but the quantum-magnonics payoff needs propagating-spin-wave data before it is fully earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19044 v2 pith:UBTW5ZRL submitted 2025-08-26 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.other

Rostyslav O. Serha , Carsten Dubs , Christo Guguschev , Bernd Aichner , David Schmoll , Julien Schäfer , Jaganandha Panda , Matthias Weiler
show 3 more authors
Philipp Pirro Michal Urbánek Andrii V. Chumak
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other PACS 76.50.+g75.70.-i85.75.-d
keywords YIGthinfilmsYSGAGsubstratemagneticdampingferromagneticresonancemillikelvintemperaturesquantummagnonicsGGGdiamagneticgarnet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum magnonics wants to use magnons in YIG thin films as low-loss carriers of quantum information at the millikelvin temperatures where superconducting qubits operate. The standard YIG-on-GGG platform fails there, because the paramagnetic GGG substrate magnetizes and adds damping at low temperature. This paper tests a newly grown diamagnetic garnet, YSGAG, as the substrate for a 150 nm YIG film, and compares it with a YIG/GGG reference using broadband ferromagnetic resonance from 300 K down to 30 mK. It finds the YIG/YSGAG film has α = 4.29 × 10⁻⁵ at room temperature, keeps its linewidth near 0.2 mT across the whole temperature range, and reaches 62 µT at 1.9 GHz at 30 mK, while the YIG/GGG reference broadens to about 2 mT at low temperatures. The paper attributes this to YSGAG being diamagnetic, which eliminates the stray-field and dipolar-coupling losses from a magnetized substrate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the YSGAG substrate, a cubic garnet Y₃(Sc,Ga,Al)₂(Ga,Al)₃O₁₂ developed as a diamagnetic, lattice-matched alternative to GGG. Its diamagnetism means that in an applied magnetic field it produces no stray field and no dipolar or exchange coupling to the YIG layer—the mechanisms the paper identifies as responsible for the low-temperature damping upturn in YIG/GGG. The supporting experimental technique is the microstructuring of the YIG film into 500 µm stripes under the FMR antenna, which suppresses inhomogeneous linewidth contributions and lets the measurements isolate the intrinsic damping.

What would settle it

A propagating spin-wave experiment on the same YIG/YSGAG film at 20–100 mK, measuring decay length or linewidth as a function of wavenumber, would settle the claim. If k ≠ 0 magnons show a strong damping increase or short lifetimes in YIG/YSGAG, the central conclusion about quantum magnonics would be unsupported; if they remain as low as the k = 0 FMR line suggests, the claim would be confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that replacing GGG with the diamagnetic garnet YSGAG removes the dominant low-temperature dissipation channel in YIG films without sacrificing room-temperature performance. In ferromagnetic resonance measurements, the YIG/YSGAG film shows a Gilbert damping parameter α = 4.29 × 10⁻⁵ at room temperature, comparable to the best YIG films and bulk YIG, and no significant temperature-driven increase in linewidth down to 30 mK. The authors identify the mechanism: GGG's Gd³⁺ ions carry spin 7/2 and become strongly magnetized below about 100 K, generating stray fields and dipolar coupling that broaden the YIG resonance, while YSGAG has no net magnetic moments, so these channels

Load-bearing premise

The argument that YSGAG is the ideal substrate for quantum magnonics assumes that the uniform-precession (k = 0) damping measured here is representative of the propagating magnons that would actually carry quantum information; the paper itself cites evidence that GGG-induced dipolar losses are stronger for k ≠ 0 modes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quantum magnonics experiments at millikelvin temperatures can use YIG/YSGAG films as drop-in replacements for YIG/GGG without the substrate-induced broadening that has limited coherence.
  • The measured effective magnetization of 130–185 kA/m over temperature keeps YIG/YSGAG in the same frequency range as conventional YIG/GGG, so existing device designs remain usable.
  • The paper's observation of record-low FMR linewidths below 0.1 mT in the resolvable single-peak regime suggests that improving material homogeneity would bring millikelvin magnon lifetimes closer to bulk YIG.
  • Because YSGAG is diamagnetic, low-temperature FMR and hybrid cavity-magnon measurements no longer need the elaborate substrate-background subtraction procedures developed for GGG.
  • The roughly 10% lower effective magnetization, attributed to tensile strain from a slightly larger lattice constant, can be used as a tuning knob through lattice engineering of the substrate composition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The FMR measurements concern only the uniform precession mode (k = 0); the paper cites companion work showing substrate dipolar losses are more pronounced for propagating magnons with k ≠ 0. The logical next test is propagating spin-wave spectroscopy on YIG/YSGAG in the millikelvin range, to see whether the diamagnetic substrate suppresses those losses too.
  • If those k ≠ 0 losses do vanish, YSGAG could also benefit cavity magnon-polariton and magnon-qubit coupling experiments, since removing the gadolinium EPR background from the GGG substrate would clean up the microwave environment.
  • The residual linewidth maximum at 30–50 K, which the paper assigns to rare-earth impurities, points to a separate optimization path: purifying the YIG film or substrate could lower damping further and make the temperature plateau even flatter.
  • A quantitative comparison across films with identical thickness, growth method, and stripe geometry would be needed to separate the substrate effect from the residual multi-peak FMR contribution; the paper's comparison set varies in all three.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports broadband VNA-FMR measurements on a 150 nm LPE-grown YIG film on a newly developed diamagnetic YSGAG substrate, with a 140 nm YIG/GGG film grown under identical conditions as reference. Measurements span 300 K down to 30 mK. From linear fits of FMR linewidth versus frequency the authors extract effective Gilbert damping, inhomogeneous broadening, effective magnetization, and gyromagnetic ratio. The central claim is that YIG/YSGAG maintains low magnetic damping over the entire temperature range, with alpha = 4.29 x 10^-5 at room temperature and no low-temperature upturn, because the diamagnetic substrate eliminates the losses caused by the magnetized GGG substrate. The paper concludes that YSGAG is an ideal substrate for YIG in quantum magnonics.

Significance. If substantiated, the result is a significant materials advance: it identifies a lattice-matched, diamagnetic substrate that removes a known low-temperature damping bottleneck for YIG films. The experimental work is direct and includes measurements down to 30 mK, careful background subtraction with dual reference fields, microstructured stripes to reduce inhomogeneous broadening, and consistency checks between two cryogenic setups. The comparison with YIG/GGG is appropriate. However, the central claim about suitability for quantum magnonics rests on FMR (k = 0) data only, while the stated technological target is propagating magnons. The paper itself cites evidence that substrate-induced losses are wavenumber-dependent and vanish for FMR modes, so the extrapolation to finite-k magnon damping is not justified by the presented measurements. This is the main load-bearing gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 3 and Sec. IV] The quantum-magnonics conclusion is based solely on FMR (k = 0) linewidth measurements. The introduction motivates the work by the need for propagating single magnons, and the conclusion states that the results 'pave the way for operating with propagating magnons.' However, the paper itself notes, citing ref. [21], that substrate-induced dipolar losses in YIG/GGG are pronounced only for propagating magnons with k ≠ 0 and vanish for FMR modes. Therefore the measured k = 0 linewidth does not establish low damping for the finite-k magnons that would carry quantum information. No propagating spin-wave spectroscopy, attenuation-length data, or k-resolved lifetime measurement is provided. Either such data should be added, or the claims about quantum magnonics and spin-wave-based quantum technologies must be substantially weakened to refer specifically to FMR modes.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. III] The abstract claims 'no low-temperature upturn' and 'no significant temperature-dependent increase in damping,' but the results show a linewidth maximum in YIG/YSGAG around 30-50 K, attributed by the authors to rare-earth impurities. This is a temperature-dependent increase, even if not as large as in YIG/GGG. The wording should be qualified to state that the GGG-related damping increase is eliminated, while impurity-related broadening remains. As written, the abstract and the body are internally inconsistent on this point.
  3. [Sec. III, Fig. 3(a) and Table I] The low-temperature linewidth values are obtained from a single sample per system, frequency-band averaging, and selection of 'the most intense FMR peaks' when multi-peak spectra are present. The error bars in Fig. 3(a) are large at millikelvin temperatures, and the selection of peaks is not systematically justified. This limits the reliability of the quantitative claims, including the 'record-low linewidths' and the comparison with literature. The authors should provide a full analysis of all resolved peaks, quantify the effect of peak selection on the extracted damping, and ideally include multiple samples to establish reproducibility.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'which is the lowest value reported so far for YIG/GGG films' appears to refer to the YIG/YSGAG sample, not YIG/GGG. Please clarify the wording to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Sec. I] Typo: 'an signficant increase' should be 'a significant increase.' Also 'Y AG' should be 'YAG.'
  3. [Sec. II and Fig. 1] The figure caption says 'in a x-axis logarithmic scale'; this should be 'on a logarithmic x-axis.' Similar phrasing appears elsewhere.
  4. [Table I] Table I is referenced but appears incomplete in the provided text. The table should include explicit uncertainties for all fitted parameters and define all symbols (e.g., alpha_eff, Delta B0, gamma, Meff) in the caption.
  5. [Data availability] The data availability statement says data are available 'upon reasonable request.' For a paper claiming material superiority, deposition and raw measurement data should ideally be deposited in a public repository to allow independent verification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the central damping values are direct FMR measurements, not derived from the model or from self-cited prior work.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims are the measured FMR linewidths and extracted Gilbert damping of YIG/YSGAG and YIG/GGG down to 30 mK. These are direct experimental results, not outputs of a theory whose inputs already contain the conclusion. The YIG/GGG reference is co-measured in the same work, providing an internal control. Self-citations to [14]-[16], [21], and [28] supply background, methodology, and the substrate's claimed diamagnetism, but none of these citations is used to generate the measured damping values or to define the conclusion by construction. The paper also benchmarks against external literature (Will-Cole, Guo, Legrand). The main scientific weakness—extrapolating from k=0 FMR linewidth to propagating magnons relevant to quantum magnonics—is an overreach or an unsupported inference, not a circularity. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported to force the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard FMR analysis plus domain assumptions about GGG-induced damping and YSGAG's diamagnetism. No free theoretical parameters are introduced; the fitted quantities are measurement-derived. The most fragile items are the attribution of the 30-50 K broadening to rare-earth impurities and the reliance on the companion paper for the substrate's properties.

free parameters (5)
  • Gilbert damping parameter alpha_eff = 4.29e-5 (YIG/YSGAG), 4.32e-5 (YIG/GGG) at 300 K
    Obtained from linear fit of FMR linewidth versus frequency; the central damping claim depends on this fitted slope.
  • Inhomogeneous linewidth broadening Delta B0 = Not given in extract (Table I)
    Intercept of the linear FWHM versus frequency fit; contributes to linewidth analysis and reported lifetime estimates.
  • Effective magnetization Meff = 131 to 184 kA/m for YIG/YSGAG; 144 to 206 kA/m for YIG/GGG
    From Kittel fits; used to interpret frequency shifts and strain effects.
  • Gyromagnetic ratio gamma = 28.14 to 28.12 GHz/T for YIG/YSGAG; 28.12 to 28.07 GHz/T for YIG/GGG
    Fitted in the Kittel analysis; comparison between samples and temperatures.
  • Brillouin fit parameters for GGG magnetization = Not specified
    Interpolation of VSM data to correct the GGG stray field in the Kittel fit for the YIG/GGG reference sample.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kittel equation and Gilbert damping model describe the FMR response of the YIG films.
    Used in Sec. II to extract Meff, gamma, and alpha from frequency-dependent FMR data.
  • domain assumption The GGG substrate's low-temperature damping enhancement is caused by its paramagnetic magnetization and stray field, as established in refs. [14-16,21].
    The paper relies on prior (mostly self-cited) work to attribute the YIG/GGG damping rise to the substrate rather than to the YIG film itself.
  • domain assumption YSGAG is diamagnetic with negligible magnetic susceptibility and is structurally compatible with YIG (from companion paper [28]).
    The substrate's key property is asserted via citation to the authors' own preprint; no direct magnetization measurement of YSGAG is presented in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The 30-50 K linewidth broadening in YIG/YSGAG is due to rare-earth impurities.
    Attributed to rare-earth impurities based on literature mechanisms, without direct compositional analysis in this paper.
  • domain assumption Microstructuring of YIG into stripes does not itself cause the observed low-temperature damping suppression.
    Microstructuring is known to narrow linewidths by reducing inhomogeneity (ref. [16]); the comparison assumes both samples benefit equally.
invented entities (1)
  • YSGAG substrate crystal (Y3(Sc,Ga,Al)2(Ga,Al)3O12) independent evidence
    purpose: Diamagnetic, nearly lattice-matched substrate to replace GGG and eliminate low-temperature damping from paramagnetic substrate magnetization.
    The crystal is a real synthesized material introduced in companion preprint [28] by overlapping authors; its lattice constant and diamagnetism are claimed there. The present paper's low-T FMR results provide indirect evidence of its benefit, but no direct magnetic characterization is given here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of YSGAG: The Ideal Substrate for YIG in Quantum Magnonics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UBTW5ZRL

@misc{pith2026250819044,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: YSGAG: The Ideal Substrate for YIG in Quantum Magnonics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UBTW5ZRL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19044}
}
abstract

Quantum magnonics leverages the quantum properties of magnons to advance nanoscale quantum information technologies. Ferrimagnetic yttrium iron garnet (YIG), known for exceptionally long magnon lifetimes, is a cornerstone material typically grown as thin films on gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) for lattice matching. However, paramagnetic GGG introduces detrimental damping at low temperatures due to substrate magnetization, undermining quantum applications. Here, we study magnetic damping in a 150$\,$nm-thick YIG film on a yttrium scandium gallium aluminum garnet (YSGAG) substrate, a newly developed diamagnetic alternative to GGG. Using ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy down to 30$\,$mK, we compare YIG/YSGAG with a conventional YIG/GGG reference system. We demonstrate that the YIG/YSGAG system maintains low damping from 300$\,$K to 30$\,$mK, with $\alpha = 4.29\times10^{-5}$ at room temperature, comparable to the best YIG/GGG films and bulk YIG, with no low-temperature upturn. The diamagnetic substrate eliminates the dissipation mechanisms that dominate on magnetized GGG, preserving low magnetic damping across the full temperature range. Consequently, YSGAG serves as an ideal substrate for YIG films in quantum magnonics and is paving the way for the development of spin-wave-based quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19044 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Crystallographic structure of the diamagnetic YSGAG substrate. The cubic lattice structure of YSGAG is similar to that of YIG, but with iron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Normalized example FMR spectra ∆S12 as a function of frequency f for YIG/GGG and YIG/YSGAG in an external field B0 of 1 T and temperatures of 300 K and 1.8 K. (b) (upper) FMR FWHM linewidth ∆B and corresponding Gilbert fit in orange linearly as a function of the FMR resonance frequency fFMR at 300 K. The closed circles and straight line represent measurements and fit for the YIG/GGG reference system, while the o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Frequency-band-averaged FMR FWHM linewidth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Strong coupling between propagating spin wave and microwave photons in a superconducting resonator

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Experimental demonstration of strong coupling between Damon-Eshbach and backward-volume propagating spin wave modes and microwave photons in a superconducting resonator on YIG thin films, with coupling rates exceeding...

  2. Low-temperature-compatible iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Liquid phase epitaxy yields strained YIG films on diamagnetic YSGG with FMR linewidths below 1 mT at 3 K, avoiding the paramagnetic substrate losses of YIG/GGG.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [21]

    Schmoll, D. et al. Wavenumber-dependent magnetic losses in yttrium iron garnet–gadolinium gallium garnet heterostructures at millikelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. B 111, 134428 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010), 10th anniversary edn

    work page 2010

  3. [2]

    Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable supercon- ducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Chumak, A. V . et al. Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave computing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 58, 1–72 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    V ., Vasyuchka, V

    Chumak, A. V ., Vasyuchka, V . I., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Magnon spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11, 1505–1549 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [5]

    Tabuchi, Y . et al. Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit. Science 349, 405–408 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    Yuan, H., Cao, Y ., Kamra, A., Duine, R. A. & Yan, P. Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information sci- ence. Phys. Rep. 965, 1–74 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Li, Y . et al. Hybrid magnonics: Physics, circuits, and applications for coherent information processing. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 130902 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 43 references
  1. [8]

    & Nakamura, Y

    Lachance-Quirion, D., Tabuchi, Y ., Gloppe, A., Usami, K. & Nakamura, Y . Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics. Appl. Phys. Express 12, 070101 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Krantz, P. et al. A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    & L’vov, V

    Cherepanov, V ., Kolokolov, I. & L’vov, V . The saga of yig: Spectra, thermodynamics, interaction and relaxation of magnons in a complex magnet. Phys. Rep. 229, 81–144 (1993)

    1993

  4. [11]

    Dubs, C. et al. Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 204005 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Klingler, S. et al. Gilbert damping of magnetostatic modes in a yttrium iron garnet sphere. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 092409 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    Serha, R. O. et al. Ultra-long-living magnons in the quantum limit (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22773

    2025 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Serha, R. O. et al. Magnetic anisotropy and ggg substrate stray field in YIG films down to millikelvin temperatures. npj Spintronics 2 (2024). 7

    2024

  8. [15]

    Serha, R. O. et al. Damping enhancement in YIG at millikelvin temperatures due to GGG substrate. Materials Today Quantum 5, 100025 (2025)

    2025

  9. [16]

    Schmoll, D. et al. Elimination of substrate-induced ferromagnetic resonance linewidth broadening in the epitaxial system YIG-GGG by microstructuring. Low Temperature Physics 51, 724–730 (2025)

    2025

  10. [17]

    Guo, S., McCullian, B., Hammel, P. C. & Yang, F. Low damp- ing at few-K temperatures in Y 3Fe5O12 epitaxial films isolated from Gd3Ga5O12 substrate using a diamagnetic Y 3Sc2.5Al2.5O12 spacer. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 562, 169795 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    Jermain, C. L. et al. Increased low-temperature damping in yttrium iron garnet thin films. Phys. Rev. B 95, 174411 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    Mihalceanu, L. et al. Temperature-dependent relaxation of dipole- exchange magnons in yttrium iron garnet films. Phys. Rev. B 97, 214405 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    F., Bozhko, D

    Kosen, S., van Loo, A. F., Bozhko, D. A., Mihalceanu, L. & Karenowska, A. D. Microwave magnon damping in YIG films at millikelvin temperatures. APL Mater. 7, 101120 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Knauer, S. et al. Propagating spin-wave spectroscopy in a liquid- phase epitaxial nanometer-thick YIG film at millikelvin temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 133, 143905 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    C., Stenning, G

    Sposito, A., May-Smith, T. C., Stenning, G. B. G., de Groot, P. A. J. & Eason, R. W. Pulsed laser deposition of high-quality µm-thick YIG films on Y AG. Opt. Mater. Express 3, 624–632 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Krysztofik, A., Özo ˘glu, S., McMichael, R. D. & Coy, E. Effect of strain-induced anisotropy on magnetization dynamics in Y3Fe5O12 films recrystallized on a lattice-mismatched substrate. Sci. Rep. 11 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Guo, S. et al. Strong on-chip microwave photon–magnon coupling using ultralow-damping epitaxial Y 3Fe5O12 films at 2K. Nano Letters 23, 5055–5060 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Legrand, W. et al. Lattice-tunable substituted iron garnets for low-temperature magnonics. Advanced Functional Materials 2503644 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Will-Cole, A. R. et al. Negligible magnetic losses at low temperatures in liquid phase epitaxy grown Y 3Fe5O12 films. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 054411 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Guguschev, C. et al. Novel diamagnetic garnet-type substrate single crystals for ultralow-damping yttrium iron garnet Y 3Fe5O12 films at cryogenic temperatures (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18101

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dubs, C. et al. Low damping and microstructural perfection of sub- 40nm-thin yttrium iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 024416 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Maier-Flaig, H. et al. Note: Derivative divide, a method for the analysis of broadband ferromagnetic resonance in the frequency domain. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 076101 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Böttcher, T. et al. Fast long-wavelength exchange spin waves in partially compensated Ga:YIG. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 102401 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    V ., Nechiporuk, A

    Danilov, V ., Lyfar’, D., Lyubon’ko, Y . V ., Nechiporuk, A. Y . & Ryabchenko, S. Low-temperature ferromagnetic resonance in epitaxial garnet films on paramagnetic substrates. Sov. Phys. J. 32, 276–280 (1989)

    1989

  25. [33]

    Haidar, M. et al. Thickness- and temperature-dependent magnetody- namic properties of yttrium iron garnet thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 17D119 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Maier-Flaig, H. et al. Temperature-dependent magnetic damping of yttrium iron garnet spheres. Phys. Rev. B 95, 214423 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Dillon, J. F. & Nielsen, J. W. Effects of rare earth impurities on ferrimagnetic resonance in yttrium iron garnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 30–31 (1959)

    1959

  28. [36]

    G., LeCraw, R

    Spencer, E. G., LeCraw, R. C. & Clogston, A. M. Low-temperature line-width maximum in yttrium iron garnet. Physical Review Letters 3, 32–33 (1959)

    1959

  29. [37]

    & Kittel, C

    Sparks, M., Loudon, R. & Kittel, C. Ferromagnetic relaxation. i. theory of the relaxation of the uniform precession and the degenerate spectrum in insulators at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. 122, 791–803 (1961)

    1961

  30. [38]

    Seiden, P. E. Ferrimagnetic resonance relaxation in rare-earth iron garnets. Phys. Rev. 133, A728–A736 (1964)

    1964

  31. [39]

    Boventer, I. et al. Complex temperature dependence of coupling and dissipation of cavity magnon polaritons from millikelvin to room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    & Bhagat, S

    Barak, J., Huang, M. & Bhagat, S. Electron paramagnetic resonance study of gadolinium-gallium-garnet. J. Appl. Phys. 71, 849–853 (1992)

    1992

  33. [41]

    R., Danilov, V

    Bedyukh, A. R., Danilov, V . V ., Nechiporuk, A. Y . & Romanyuk, V . F. Resonant magnetic properties of gadolinium-gallium garnet single crystals. Low Temp. Phys. 25, 182–183 (1999)

    1999

  34. [42]

    & Papaioannou, E

    Schmidt, G., Hauser, C., Trempler, P., Paleschke, M. & Papaioannou, E. T. Ultra thin films of yttrium iron garnet with very low damping: A review. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 257, 1900644 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Ding, J., Liu, T., Chang, H. & Wu, M. Sputtering growth of low-damping yttrium-iron-garnet thin films. IEEE Magn. Lett. 11, 1–5 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.