Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Replacing the standard paramagnetic GGG substrate with commercially available diamagnetic YSGG lets liquid-phase-epitaxy yttrium iron garnet films keep ferromagnetic resonance linewidths below 1 mT down to 3 K, removing the main obstacle to

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Liquid phase epitaxy yields strained YIG films on diamagnetic YSGG with FMR linewidths below 1 mT at 3 K, avoiding the paramagnetic substrate losses of YIG/GGG.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection First LPE growth of strained YIG on diamagnetic YSGG delivers cryogenic FMR linewidths below 1 mT at 3 K; a solid, honest experimental paper that deserves peer review, with a missing composition depth profile as the main (non-fatal) gap. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2509.06242 v1 pith:ITMUGWU3 submitted 2025-09-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Low-temperature-compatible iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy

Jamal Ben Youssef , Nathan Beaulieu , Richard Schlitz , Davit Petrosyan , Michaela Lammel , William Legrand This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 76.50.+g75.70.-i
keywords yttrium iron garnetliquid phase epitaxyferromagnetic resonancecryogenic magnonicsdiamagnetic substrateyttrium scandium gallium garnetGilbert dampingstrain relaxation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that thin yttrium iron garnet (YIG) films can stay as low-loss at 3 K as they are at room temperature, provided they are grown on the right substrate. The key move is replacing the standard gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrate — strongly paramagnetic and a known killer of magnon lifetimes at low temperatures — with commercially available, diamagnetic yttrium scandium gallium garnet (YSGG). Using liquid phase epitaxy, the authors grow fully strained YIG films under 100 nm thick on YSGG and measure ferromagnetic resonance linewidths below 1 mT at 3 K, with almost no temperature dependence between 3 and 300 K. A comparison film on GGG degrades sharply at low temperatures, and the paper shows quantitatively that most of that degradation is a stray-field artifact of the GGG substrate itself. If correct, this gives cryogenic magnonics and quantum-hybrid experiments a straightforward thin-film platform without lift-off or substrate-removal steps.

Core claim

On its own terms: growing YIG by liquid phase epitaxy on a diamagnetic YSGG substrate removes the dominant low-temperature loss channel in thin-film magnonics. The paper reports a ferromagnetic resonance linewidth of 0.7 mT at 3 K and 46 GHz (below 1 mT across the range), a Gilbert damping upper bound of 2 × 10^-4, and a linewidth that barely moves between 3 and 100 K, in both in-plane and out-of-plane field geometries. For comparison, YIG/GGG films measured in the same setup show a strong low-temperature linewidth increase, which the authors trace, via a shape-dependent stray-field model, to the paramagnetic GGG substrate's magnetization rather than to the YIG film itself. The residual temp

What carries the argument

The central object is the YSGG substrate (yttrium scandium gallium garnet), a commercial diamagnetic garnet whose lattice parameter sits about 0.7 percent below YIG's, close enough to support fully strained pseudomorphic YIG films up to roughly 100 nm thick. Its job is to eliminate the paramagnetic Gd3+ moments that, in the standard GGG case, couple to the film and broaden the resonance at cryogenic temperatures. The argument's quantitative engine is a two-part model: a mean-field Brillouin-function description of GGG's magnetization, and a computed stray-field distribution (using demagnetizing factors and field-profile statistics) that yields the extra linewidth contribution subtracted from

Load-bearing premise

The central claim assumes that the YIG/YSGG interface is as chemically inert as the YIG/GGG interface — that scandium and gallium from the substrate do not diffuse into the film during growth — yet the paper supports this only with X-ray structural data and no direct composition depth profile.

What would settle it

A secondary-ion mass spectrometry or EDX depth profile across the YIG/YSGG interface: measurable scandium or gallium in the YIG layer beyond the first nanometre, or at levels above roughly 0.01 per formula unit, would mean the 3 K linewidth carries extrinsic impurity losses beyond those the paper assigns to strain. Alternatively, growing the same film on a strain-compensated or lattice-matched diamagnetic substrate and seeing the 3 K linewidth drop below 0.7 mT would confirm that strain, not something intrinsic to YSGG, sets the current floor.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Cryogenic magnonic devices can use unpatterned LPE YIG films on commercial YSGG directly, with no need to lift the film off its growth substrate.
  • The FMR linewidth stays nearly flat from 300 K down to 3 K, so the paramagnetic-substrate degradation that dominates YIG/GGG below about 50 K is avoided in both in-plane and out-of-plane geometries.
  • The fully strained thickness window (below roughly 100 nm) defines the usable range for YIG-on-YSGG films; above it, strain relaxation sharply degrades the linewidth.
  • The measured upper bound on intrinsic Gilbert damping (below 2 × 10^-4 at 3 K) is low enough to support coherent magnonic and hybrid-superconducting-qubit experiments at cryogenic temperatures.
  • Residual inhomogeneous broadening is tied to strain and substrate quality, pointing to strain mitigation as the next improvement step for these films.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If strain is the dominant residual loss source, lattice-matched diamagnetic substrates or strain-compensating buffer layers should push 3 K linewidths toward the bulk-YIG limit, possibly extending usefulness toward millikelvin temperatures.
  • The stray-field correction model implies that some previously reported low-temperature damping values for YIG/GGG were substrate artifacts; re-analyzing such data with comparable corrections would revise the apparent temperature dependence of the Gilbert damping.
  • Patterning these films into microstructures should remove most inhomogeneous broadening, potentially revealing an intrinsic damping below 1 × 10^-4 at 3 K and enabling a direct comparison with bulk YIG spheres.
  • The same LPE growth on YSGG should transfer to substituted iron garnets, allowing strain-tuned anisotropy and magnetization while keeping cryogenic compatibility.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports liquid-phase-epitaxial growth of sub-100-nm YIG films on (111)-oriented yttrium scandium gallium garnet (YSGG) substrates, with X-ray reflectivity, diffraction, and reciprocal-space-map evidence for fully strained, pseudomorphic growth below roughly 90–110 nm. Broadband FMR measurements from 293 K down to 3 K compare YIG/YSGG with YIG/GGG. On YSGG, the FMR linewidth remains nearly flat down to 3 K; the best OOP value is 0.7 mT at 46 GHz, with a conservative upper bound α<2×10−4. The large low-temperature linewidth increase of YIG/GGG is attributed primarily to inhomogeneous stray fields from the paramagnetic GGG substrate, modeled in Appendix C. The authors conclude that LPE YIG on commercial YSGG removes the substrate-paramagnetism bottleneck for cryogenic magnonics.

Significance. If substantiated, the result is significant: it provides a straightforward LPE route to low-loss iron-garnet films on a diamagnetic substrate for cryogenic magnonics and hybrid quantum devices. The strengths are real: linewidths are directly measured with documented broadband FMR and field-differential analysis; apparent Gilbert damping is separated from inhomogeneous broadening; the GGG stray-field contribution is modeled quantitatively with an explicit procedure; and the claims are qualified as applying to unpatterned films and as upper bounds. The principal gap is chemical characterization of the film and of the film/substrate interface, which is important for attributing the measured low linewidth to intrinsic YIG rather than to a fortuitous substituted-garnet composition.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II, Table I and Fig. 2] The central attribution of the low-temperature linewidth to intrinsic YIG on a diamagnetic substrate rests on the assumption that the LPE film is stoichiometric YIG with negligible Sc/Ga interdiffusion at the YIG/YSGG interface. The X-ray RSM and Laue-oscillation data establish structural coherence and full strain but cannot detect dilute cation substitution. Refs. [23,24] document minimal interdiffusion only for LPE YIG/GGG; YSGG has a different lattice mismatch, composition, and growth chemistry. If Sc or Ga enters the film, the magnetization, anisotropy, and low-temperature relaxation would be modified, so the measured linewidth would not exclusively reflect intrinsic YIG properties. Please provide a composition depth profile (SIMS, EDX, or TEM) or explicitly qualify the conclusions as applying to the actual film composition rather than to intrinsic YIG.
  2. [Table I and Figs. 5, 7, 9] The quantitative claims—linewidth below 1 mT at 3 K, α<2×10−4, and the weak temperature dependence—are reported without uncertainties or error bars. The fits to μ0ΔH(f) are shown, but the fit parameters in Table I and Figs. 5, 7, and 9 have no confidence intervals. Since the comparison between YSGG A and B and the threshold 'below 1 mT' are central to the paper, representative uncertainty estimates (at least for the headline values and one full temperature sweep) are needed to support those claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption; Appendix C] Several figure captions and Appendix C equations contain garbled placeholder text (e.g., '/uni...' sequences). The final version should render all symbols cleanly.
  2. [Fig. 5] The label 'no subs.' in Figs. 5(c) and 5(d) is not defined in the caption. Please define it as 'after subtracting the substrate stray-field contribution ΔB_stray'.
  3. [Throughout] The notation for the stray-field broadening is inconsistent: 'ΔB_stray', 'ΔBstray', and 'ΔB stray' are used. Please unify.
  4. [Section II, FMR analysis] The text states that fits exclude low-frequency data points below 6 GHz, but the exact cutoff used for each sample and temperature is not given. Please state the cutoff, since Table I parameters depend on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central YIG/YSGG low-temperature linewidth is a directly measured FMR result, not a derived or fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is experimental: LPE-grown YIG/YSGG films exhibit μ0ΔH ≈ 0.7 mT at 3 K and 46 GHz, with weak temperature and frequency dependence. This is a direct FMR measurement (Figs. 4, 6, 8, 10), not the output of a model or a fitted parameter. The Gilbert-form fits are standard linear decompositions of measured linewidth versus frequency, and the reported α < 2×10⁻⁴ is an upper bound computed from the measured 0.7 mT point, not a prediction obtained from an input. The only self-citations are (i) Ref. [23], used together with independent external Ref. [24] to support minimal LPE interdiffusion, and (ii) Ref. [38], the quadratic stray-field formula in Appendix C used to model the GGG paramagnetic contribution for the comparison sample. Neither is load-bearing for the YSGG result: the YSGG low-temperature linewidth is read directly from FMR, and the GGG stray-field correction is an interpretive analysis of the reference sample. The absence of a SIMS/EDX composition depth profile is a real experimental limitation that bears on robustness, but it is not a circularity, because no fitted constant or self-cited result is being used to generate the claimed linewidth. The derivation chain therefore does not reduce to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central measured result rests on standard FMR analysis and a small set of fitted parameters (alpha', Delta H0) plus a hand-chosen frequency cutoff. The assumptions are standard material and modeling choices, with the interface interdiffusion assumption being the least directly verified.

free parameters (3)
  • apparent Gilbert damping alpha' = e.g., about 2e-4 for YSGG A at 3 K, IP (Fig. 5c)
    Obtained from linear fit of the FMR linewidth versus frequency using the Gilbert model. Central to claims about weak temperature dependence of damping.
  • inhomogeneous linewidth mu0 Delta H0 = e.g., about 0.6-0.8 mT for YSGG A at 3-40 K (Fig. 5d)
    Intercept of the same linear fits; used to argue strain and impurity contributions dominate at low temperatures.
  • linear-fit low-frequency cutoff = 6 GHz
    Points below 6 GHz are excluded from the fits by hand; the choice affects the extracted alpha' and Delta H0.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Kittel equation and Gilbert linewidth model describe the FMR of the films.
    Used in Section II to extract gamma, mu0Heff, alpha', and Delta H0 from the resonance field and linewidth versus frequency data.
  • domain assumption The GGG substrate magnetization is described by a mean-field Brillouin model with literature parameters, including lambda = -1.3 and M_sat = 813 kA/m.
    Appendix C, Eq. (C1); used to compute stray-field broadening in the YIG/GGG comparison.
  • domain assumption YSGG is diamagnetic and produces no magnetic stray field in the FMR measurement.
    Central to the claim that substrate paramagnetism is eliminated; reasonable given no Gd content, but not directly measured in this work.
  • domain assumption LPE growth on YSGG yields minimal cation interdiffusion, by analogy with LPE on GGG.
    Invoked in Section II and the Introduction via Refs. [23,24]; no direct interface composition measurement is provided.
  • domain assumption Linear superposition of Lorentzian (Gilbert) and Gaussian (inhomogeneous) broadening is a sufficient model when their widths differ.
    Section IV cites Ref. [49]; used to interpret alpha' as an upper bound when Delta H0 dominates.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low-temperature-compatible iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ITMUGWU3

@misc{pith2026250906242,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low-temperature-compatible iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ITMUGWU3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06242}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Single-crystalline yttrium iron garnet (YIG) thin films (< 100 nm) form the backbone of magnonics, owing to the record-low losses affecting their magnetization dynamics. However, thin epitaxial YIG has mostly been investigated under ambient temperatures, limited by the paramagnetic losses occurring at low temperatures due to the gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrates required for epitaxial growth. Driven by a growing interest in magnonic devices that can operate in cryogenic conditions and address quantum information applications, there is a strong need for iron garnet epitaxial films grown on diamagnetic substrates that can maintain low losses at low temperatures. In this work, we use liquid phase epitaxy (LPE) to grow ultrathin films of strained YIG on a commercial diamagnetic substrate, yttrium scandium gallium garnet (YSGG). We investigate their magnetization dynamics in the 3-300 K temperature range, and compare them to equivalent films grown on paramagnetic GGG. We demonstrate for LPE YIG on YSGG substrates a ferromagnetic resonance linewidth below 1 mT at 3 K, together with a very weak temperature and frequency dependence of the losses. The growth of YIG/YSGG by LPE provides a straightforward approach to producing iron garnet thin films for use in low-temperature investigations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06242 by Davit Petrosyan, Jamal Ben Youssef, Michaela Lammel, Nathan Beaulieu, Richard Schlitz, William Legrand.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. In-plane ferromagnetic resonance (IP FMR) char [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. X-ray reciprocal space maps around the (624) substrate peaks for (a) YSGG A and (b) YSGG B samples. Vertical and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) (a,c,e,g) in-plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. In-plane ferromagnetic resonance (IP FMR) losses in the temperature range 3–300 K for films YIG/GGG A and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of magnetization dynamics parame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: YIG/YSGG B is grown from the same melt, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. In-plane ferromagnetic resonance (IP FMR) losses in the temperature range 3–300 K for films of YIG/YSGG A and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of magnetization dynamics parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Out-of-plane ferromagnetic resonance (OOP FMR) losses in the temperature range 3–300 K for films of YIG/YSGG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Out-of-plane ferromagnetic resonance (OOP FMR) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Comparison of magnetization dynamics parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: As was found before, the deviation of γ/(2π) from its room-temperature value is more pronounced for OOP than for IP, because the stray field inhomogeneity is higher when the GGG magnetization is aligned with a short direction of the substrate. Likewise, the shift of γ/(2π) is larger for YIG/GGG B than for YIG/GGG A for geometrical reasons, as sample B has a smaller sur- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) X-ray reflectivity curves and (b) high-resolution X-ray diffraction curves for samples GGG A, YSGG A and YSGG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Examples of microwave transmission parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Shape-dependent magnetic properties of GGG sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Comparison of magnetization dynamics param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Strong coupling between propagating spin wave and microwave photons in a superconducting resonator

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Experimental demonstration of strong coupling between Damon-Eshbach and backward-volume propagating spin wave modes and microwave photons in a superconducting resonator on YIG thin films, with coupling rates exceeding...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Quantum magnon- ics: The magnon meets the superconducting qubit, C. R. Phys.17, 729 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and G. Agarwal, Magnon-Photon- Phonon Entanglement in Cavity Magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 203601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Kamra, E

    A. Kamra, E. Thingstad, G. Rastelli, R. A. Duine, A. Brataas, W. Belzig, and A. Sudbø, Antiferromagnetic magnons as highly squeezed Fock states underlying quan- tum correlations, Phys. Rev. B100, 174407 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    H. Y. Yuan and R. A. Duine, Magnon antibunching in a nanomagnet, Phys. Rev. B102, 100402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Sharma, V

    S. Sharma, V. A. S. V. Bittencourt, A. D. Karenowska, and S. V. Kusminskiy, Spin cat states in ferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B103, L100403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Sun, S.-S

    F.-X. Sun, S.-S. Zheng, Y. Xiao, Q. Gong, Q. He, and K. Xia, Remote Generation of Magnon Schr¨ odinger Cat State via Magnon-Photon Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 087203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Falch, A

    V. Falch, A. Brataas, and J. Danon, Phonon- and magnon-mediated decoherence of a magnonic qubit, arXiv (2025), http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08823v1

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Science349, 405 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Entanglement-based single- shot detection of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit, Science367, 425 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    S. P. Wolski, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, A. Noguchi, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Dissipation- Based Quantum Sensing of Magnons with a Supercon- ducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 117701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Xu, X.-K

    D. Xu, X.-K. Gu, H.-K. Li, Y.-C. Weng, Y.-P. Wang, J. Li, H. Wang, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum Con- trol of a Single Magnon in a Macroscopic Spin System, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 193603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    S. Rani, X. Cao, A. E. Baptista, A. Hoffmann, and W. Pfaff, High-dynamic-range quantum sensing of magnons and their dynamics using a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 064032 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    E. G. Spencer, R. C. LeCraw, and A. M. Clogston, Low-Temperature Line-Width Maximum in Yttrium Iron Garnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 32 (1959)

    work page 1959

  15. [15]

    R. O. Serha, K. H. McAllister, F. Majcen, S. Knauer, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, V. S. Tyberkevych, A. V. Chumak, and D. A. Bozhko, Ultra- long-living magnons in the quantum limit, arXiv (2025), http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22773v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Fukami, D

    M. Fukami, D. R. Candido, D. D. Awschalom, and M. E. Flatt´ e, Opportunities for Long-Range Magnon-Mediated Entanglement of Spin Qubits via On- and Off-Resonant Coupling, PRX Quantum2, 040314 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Y. Li, V. G. Yefremenko, M. Lisovenko, C. Trevillian, T. Polakovic, T. W. Cecil, P. S. Barry, J. Pearson, R. Di- van, V. Tyberkevych, C. L. Chang, U. Welp, W.-K. Kwok, and V. Novosad, Coherent Coupling of Two Re- mote Magnonic Resonators Mediated by Superconduct- ing Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 047701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    C. L. Jermain, S. V. Aradhya, N. D. Reynolds, R. A. Buhrman, J. T. Brangham, M. R. Page, P. C. Hammel, F. Y. Yang, and D. C. Ralph, Increased low-temperature damping in yttrium iron garnet thin films, Phys. Rev. B 95, 174411 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Kosen, A

    S. Kosen, A. F. van Loo, D. A. Bozhko, L. Mihalceanu, and A. D. Karenowska, Microwave magnon damping in YIG films at millikelvin temperatures, APL Mater.7, 101120 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Knauer, K

    S. Knauer, K. Dav ´ ıdkov´ a, D. Schmoll, R. O. Serha, A. Voronov, Q. Wang, R. Verba, O. V. Dobrovolskiy, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, M. Urb´ anek, and A. V. Chumak, Propagating spin-wave spectroscopy in a liquid-phase epitaxial nanometer-thick YIG film at mil- likelvin temperatures, J. Appl. Phys.133, 143905 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    R. O. Serha, A. A. Voronov, D. Schmoll, R. Verba, K. O. Levchenko, S. Koraltan, K. Dav ´ ıdkov´ a, B. Budinsk´ a, Q. Wang, O. V. Dobrovolskiy, M. Urb´ anek, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, C. Abert, D. Suess, D. A. Bozhko, S. Knauer, and A. V. Chumak, Magnetic anisotropy and GGG substrate stray field in YIG films down to millikelv...

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Schmoll, A

    D. Schmoll, A. A. Voronov, R. O. Serha, D. Slobodia- niuk, K. O. Levchenko, C. Abert, S. Knauer, D. Suess, R. Verba, and A. V. Chumak, Wavenumber-dependent magnetic losses in yttrium iron garnet–gadolinium gal- lium garnet heterostructures at millikelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. B111, 134428 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Beaulieu, N

    N. Beaulieu, N. Kervarec, N. Thiery, O. Klein, V. Nale- 11 tov, H. Hurdequint, G. de Loubens, J. Ben Youssef, and N. Vukadinovic, Temperature Dependence of Mag- netic Properties of a Ultrathin Yttrium-Iron Garnet Film Grown by Liquid Phase Epitaxy: Effect of a Pt Over- layer, IEEE Magn. Lett.9, 3706005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    A. R. Will-Cole, J. L. Hart, V. Lauter, A. Grutter, C. Dubs, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, N. R. Valdez, C. J. Pearce, T. C. Monson, J. J. Cha, D. Heiman, and N. X. Sun, Negligible magnetic losses at low temperatures in liquid phase epitaxy grown Y 3Fe5O12 films, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 054411 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    F. J. Rachford, M. Levy, R. M. Osgood, A. Kumar, and H. Bakhru, Magnetization and FMR studies of crystal- ion-sliced narrow linewidth gallium-doped yttrium iron garnet, J. Appl. Phys.87, 6253 (2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    P. G. Baity, D. A. Bozhko, R. Macˆ edo, W. Smith, R. C. Holland, S. Danilin, V. Seferai, J. Barbosa, R. R. Peroor, S. Goldman, U. Nasti, J. Paul, R. H. Hadfield, S. McVi- tie, and M. Weides, Strong magnon–photon coupling with chip-integrated YIG in the zero-temperature limit, Appl. Phys. Lett.119, 033502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    J. Xu, C. Horn, Y. Jiang, A. Pishehvar, X. Li, D. Rosen- mann, X. Han, M. Levy, S. Guha, and X. Zhang, Cryo- genic hybrid magnonic circuits based on spalled YIG thin films, J. Appl. Phys.137, 023901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    C. D. Brandle and R. L. Barns, Crystal stoichiometry and growth of rare-earth garnets containing scandium, J. Cryst. Growth20, 1 (1973)

    work page 1973

  29. [29]

    S. Guo, B. McCullian, P. C. Hammel, and F. Yang, Low damping at few-K temperatures in Y 3Fe5O12 epitaxial films isolated from Gd 3Ga5O12 substrate using a dia- magnetic Y3Sc2.5Al2.5O12 spacer, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 562, 169795 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    S. Guo, D. Russell, J. Lanier, H. Da, P. C. Hammel, and F. Yang, Strong on-Chip Microwave Photon–Magnon Coupling Using Ultralow-Damping Epitaxial Y 3Fe5O12 Films at 2 K, Nano Lett.23, 5055 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Legrand, Y

    W. Legrand, Y. Kemna, S. Sch¨ aren, H. Wang, D. Pet- rosyan, L. Holder, R. Schlitz, M. H. Aguirre, M. Lammel, and P. Gambardella, Lattice-Tunable Substituted Iron Garnets for Low-Temperature Magnonics, Adv. Funct. Mater. , 2503644 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Maier-Flaig, S

    H. Maier-Flaig, S. Klingler, C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Gross, M. Weiler, H. Huebl, and S. T. B. Goen- nenwein, Temperature-dependent magnetic damping of yttrium iron garnet spheres, Phys. Rev. B95, 214423 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    S. L. Blank and J. W. Nielsen, The growth of magnetic garnets by liquid phase epitaxy, J. Cryst. Growth17, 302 (1972)

    work page 1972

  34. [34]

    C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Linke, A. Danilewsky, U. Br¨ uckner, and J. Dellith, Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.50, 204005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Thomas, J. Osten, T. Schnei- der, K. Lenz, J. Grenzer, R. H¨ ubner, and E. Wendler, Low damping and microstructural perfection of sub- 40nm-thin yttrium iron garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 024416 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    G¨ uckelhorn, T

    J. G¨ uckelhorn, T. Wimmer, M. M¨ uller, S. Gepr¨ ags, H. Huebl, R. Gross, and M. Althammer, Magnon trans- port in Y 3Fe5O12/Pt nanostructures with reduced effec- tive magnetization, Phys. Rev. B104, L180410 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    R. O. Serha, A. A. Voronov, D. Schmoll, R. Kling- beil, S. Knauer, S. Koraltan, E. Pribytova, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, C. Abert, R. Verba, M. Urb´ anek, D. Suess, and A. V. Chumak, Damping enhancement in YIG at millikelvin temperatures due to GGG substrate, Materials Today Quantum5, 100025 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Legrand, D

    W. Legrand, D. Petrosyan, H. Wang, P. Helbingk, R. Schlitz, M. Lammel, J. Ben Youssef, and P. Gam- bardella, Implementation of field-differential phase- resolved microwave magnetic spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. In- strum.96, 034708 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    M. J. Roos, P. Quarterman, J. Ding, M. Wu, B. J. Kirby, and B. L. Zink, Magnetization and antiferromagnetic coupling of the interface between a 20 nm Y 3Fe5O12 film and Gd3Ga5O12 substrate, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 034401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    J. F. Dillon and J. W. Nielsen, Effects of Rare Earth Impurities on Ferrimagnetic Resonance in Yttrium Iron Garnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 30 (1959)

    work page 1959

  41. [41]

    J. F. Dillon, Ferrimagnetic Resonance in Rare-Earth- Doped Yttrium Iron Garnet. III. Linewidth, Phys. Rev. 127, 1495 (1962)

    work page 1962

  42. [42]

    P. E. Seiden, Ferrimagnetic Resonance Relaxation in Rare-Earth Iron Garnets, Phys. Rev.133, A728 (1964)

    work page 1964

  43. [43]

    Arias and D

    R. Arias and D. L. Mills, Extrinsic contributions to the ferromagnetic resonance response of ultrathin films, Phys. Rev. B60, 7395 (1999)

    work page 1999

  44. [44]

    K. Lenz, H. Wende, W. Kuch, K. Baberschke, K. Nagy, and A. J´ anossy, Two-magnon scattering and viscous Gilbert damping in ultrathin ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B73, 144424 (2006)

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    C. L. Jermain, H. Paik, S. V. Aradhya, R. A. Buhrman, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Low-damping sub-10-nm thin films of lutetium iron garnet grown by molecular- beam epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett.109, 192408 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    J. F. Dillon, Ferrimagnetic Resonance in Yttrium Iron Garnet at Liquid Helium Temperatures, Phys. Rev.111, 1476 (1958)

    work page 1958

  47. [47]

    E. G. Spencer, J. P. Remeika, and P. V. Lenzo, Ferromag- netic Resonance Losses in Indium-substituted Yttrium Iron Garnet, Appl. Phys. Lett.4, 171 (1964)

    work page 1964

  48. [48]

    T. S. Hartwick and J. Smit, Ferromagnetic Resonance in Si-Doped YIG, J. Appl. Phys.40, 3995 (1969)

    work page 1969

  49. [49]

    R. D. McMichael, A mean-field model of extrinsic line broadening in ferromagnetic resonance, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 07B114 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    E. G. Spencer, R. C. LeCraw, and R. C. Linares, Low- Temperature Ferromagnetic Relaxation in Yttrium Iron Garnet, Phys. Rev.123, 1937 (1961)

    work page 1937

  51. [51]

    Guguschev, C

    C. Guguschev, C. Dubs, R. Blukis, O. Surzhenko, M. Br¨ utzam, R. Koc, C. Rhode, K. Berger, C. Richter, C. Berryman, R. O. Serha, and A. V. Chumak, Novel diamagnetic garnet-type substrate single crys- tals for ultralow-damping yttrium iron garnet Y 3Fe5O12 films at cryogenic temperatures, arXiv (2025), http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18101v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    R. O. Serha, C. Dubs, C. Guguschev, B. Aich- ner, D. Schmoll, J. Panda, M. Weiler, P. Pirro, M. Urb´ anek, and A. V. Chumak, YSGAG: The Ideal Substrate for YIG in Quantum Magnonics, arXiv (2025), http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19044v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Kriegner, E

    D. Kriegner, E. Wintersberger, and J. Stangl, xrayutil- ities: a versatile tool for reciprocal space conversion of scattering data recorded with linear and area detectors, J. Appl. Crystallogr.46, 1162 (2013). 12

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Maier-Flaig, S

    H. Maier-Flaig, S. T. B. Goennenwein, R. Ohshima, M. Shiraishi, R. Gross, H. Huebl, and M. Weiler, Note: Derivative divide, a method for the analysis of broadband ferromagnetic resonance in the frequency domain, Rev. Sci. Instrum.89, 076101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    V. V. Danilov, D. L. Lyfar’, Y. V. Lyubon’ko, A. Y. Nechiporuk, and S. M. Ryabchenko, Low-temperature ferromagnetic resonance in epitaxial garnet films on para- magnetic substrates, Sov. Phys. J.32, 276 (1989)

    work page 1989

  56. [56]

    Mihalceanu, V

    L. Mihalceanu, V. I. Vasyuchka, D. A. Bozhko, T. Langner, A. Y. Nechiporuk, V. F. Romanyuk, B. Hille- brands, and A. A. Serga, Temperature-dependent relax- ation of dipole-exchange magnons in yttrium iron garnet films, Phys. Rev. B97, 214405 (2018)

    2018

  57. [57]

    Aharoni, Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferro- magnetic prisms, J

    A. Aharoni, Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferro- magnetic prisms, J. Appl. Phys.83, 3432 (1998)

    work page 1998

  58. [58]

    Ortner and L

    M. Ortner and L. G. Coliado Bandeira, Magpylib: A free Python package for magnetic field computation, Soft- wareX11, 100466 (2020). 13 /uni00000013/uni00000014/uni00000015/uni00000016/uni00000017/uni00000018 2θ/uni00000003/uni0000000b/uni00000047/uni00000048/uni0000004a/uni00000011/uni0000000c /uni00000014/uni00000013/uni00000013 /uni00000014/uni00000013/...

    work page 2020

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.