Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 85 references

Topological states and flat bands in exactly solvable decorated Cayley trees

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes an exact correspondence between a Lieb-decorated Cayley tree and an ensemble of Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, showing that the tree's flat band is a set of topologically protected edge states localized in the bulk.

desk verdict Finite-tree exact results and the SSH mapping are solid and worth citing; the infinite-tree flat-band claim overreaches because the lifted states are not square-integrable. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.11261 v2 pith:UCDTUCSU submitted 2025-11-14 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Wanda P. Duss , Askar Iliasov , Tomáš Bzdušek This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords CayleytreeBethelatticeflatbandSu-Schrieffer-Heegermodeltopologicaledgestaterank-nullitytheoremcompactlocalizedcoveringgraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that flat bands in decorated Cayley trees are not merely inherited from Euclidean flat-band lattices, but acquire a new, topological meaning. For the Lieb-decorated tree, the authors prove an exact correspondence: each symmetry sector of the tree is a one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain, and the topological zero-energy edge state of every chain becomes a zero-energy state exponentially localized at a node deep inside the tree. This gives the flat band a topological stability that survives bond disorder. Analogous mappings to trimer-SSH edge states or to edge-defect bound states are shown for double Lieb, Husimi, and clique decorations. For infinite trees, the persistence of exact flat bands is argued through a covering-graph lift of compact localized states, with the caveat that the lifted states are not square-normalizable.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the symmetry-adapted basis for Cayley trees: states are built by symmetrizing or weighing with roots of unity over all sites within a shell or within the sub-branches of a seed node, which block-diagonalizes the tight-binding Hamiltonian into one-dimensional sectors whose length scales logarithmically with tree size. Each sector Hamiltonian for the Lieb decoration is a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with hopping amplitudes 1 and √K, so the SSH topological index governs the flat band. Completing the picture are the rank-nullity theorem, which fixes the zero-energy degeneracy from sublattice imbalance, and the covering-graph argument, which lifts Euclidean compact localized st

What would settle it

Construct the universal-cover lift of the Euclidean Lieb compact localized state and compute its ℓ² norm over the infinite tree; the sum of squared amplitudes along the infinite string diverges, so no square-integrable eigenstate exists at E=0 on the infinite tree. This directly tests the Sec. VII claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Central claim: the flat band of the Lieb-Cayley tree, which looks like leaf-localized compact states, is actually the collection of topological zero modes of effective Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains obtained by block-diagonalizing the tree's permutation-symmetric sectors. Each sector Hamiltonian is an SSH chain with alternating hoppings √K and 1; the topological phase places an edge state at the chain's start, which maps back to a zero-energy state exponentially localized at the seed of that sector, deep inside the tree. The zero-energy degeneracy saturates the rank-nullity bound from the sublattice imbalance. Double Lieb, Husimi, and clique decorations show analogous flat-band states with topo

Load-bearing premise

The claim that exact flat bands persist on infinite decorated trees rests on accepting non-normalizable string states as flat-band eigenstates; if a flat band requires square-integrable states, that claim is false.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flat band at E=0 in Lieb-Cayley trees is topologically protected by chiral symmetry of the effective SSH chains, so it survives bond disorder as long as the tree terminates on a Lieb layer.
  • Changing the termination (odd vs even number of layers) switches between exact flat bands and exponentially split near-zero states, because SSH edge states on opposite ends of short chains hybridize.
  • For the double Lieb decoration, flat bands at E=±1 exist exactly only for one termination (Case 2); the rank-nullity bound then matches the number of non-symmetric sectors, each contributing one edge-state pair.
  • Husimi and clique trees do not host topological edge states, but their near-flat bands approach exact energies exponentially with tree size, and their infinite limits inherit the Euclidean parent's flat band.
  • Because the effective chains have length logarithmic in tree size, spectra of trees with roughly 10^15 sites can be computed exactly, making quantitative predictions for experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the SSH mapping is physically realized in a circuit or photonic tree network, one should be able to observe the SSH phase transition by tuning the ratio of branching to mono hoppings: the in-gap states would move from the tree's bulk to its outer boundary across the transition.
  • The non-normalizability of the infinite-tree string states implies that the exact flat band on the Bethe lattice is a spectral feature (a delta peak in the density of states) rather than a set of physical bound states; any finite-size realization will show exponentially small splittings, and 'exact' flatness is recovered only in the thermodynamic-limit spectrum.
  • The covering argument suggests a general rule: any Euclidean lattice whose flat band comes from compact localized states on cycles should have a decorated-tree analog with the same flat-band energy, provided the decoration respects the local neighborhood structure.
  • The bulk-localized topological states found here might extend to other expander graphs with negative curvature, connecting to recent observations of bulk topological states in quasicrystals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies tight-binding models on decorated Cayley trees (Lieb, double Lieb, Husimi/kagome, and clique/star decorations) as tree analogs of Euclidean lattices with flat bands. Using a symmetry-adapted basis, the authors block-diagonalize the finite-tree Hamiltonian into one-dimensional chains, compute exact spectra, and identify flat (or nearly flat) bands. They show that flat-band states in the Lieb and double-Lieb decorations map to topological edge states of SSH and SSH3 chains, with degeneracies saturating rank-nullity bounds. The final section argues, via a covering-graph construction, that exact flat bands persist on infinite decorated trees (Bethe lattices) by lifting Euclidean compact localized states to infinite string states.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable contribution: it provides exactly solvable decorated-tree models with a parameter-free derivation, explicit block-diagonalization, completeness proofs in the Supplemental Material, and a saturating rank-nullity count. The finite-size results are internally consistent and well-supported by explicit matrix identities, line-graph spectral relations, and checkable recurrence arguments. The claimed SSH mapping for the Lieb-Cayley tree is an exact structural correspondence and gives a concrete topological interpretation to the degenerate zero-energy subspace. The main weakness is the infinite-tree persistence claim in Sec. VII, which as written does not establish square-integrable flat-band eigenstates; this gap affects the paper's most general advertised result, though a repair appears plausible via the semi-infinite sector Hamiltonians.

major comments (3)
  1. [§VII, Eqs. (94)–(95) and text after Eq. (95)] The abstract claims 'persistence of exact flat bands on infinite decorated trees', but the covering-lift construction produces states that the authors themselves state 'do not belong to the space ℓ²(ℒ)'. If 'flat band' means a degenerate subspace of normalizable eigenstates, the proof does not deliver this for infinite trees; it delivers only non-normalizable formal eigenvectors. This is compounded by the remark in Sec. II that the infinite-tree DOS is a dense set of Dirac deltas, making the term 'flat band' ambiguous. The finite-tree results are unaffected, but the abstract's most general claim outruns the proven statement. Please either define a precise notion of flat band on infinite trees (e.g., as a spectral/DOS statement) and reconcile it with the abstract, or construct normalizable ℓ² states at the flat-band energies using the semi-infinite sector Hamiltonians of Eqs. (29b), (42b)
  2. [§VII, Eq. (96)] The bound ||(H−ε)ψ_L|| ≤ c/√L is asserted without derivation. The 'appropriately chosen norm' is unspecified, and the scaling is not demonstrated. If this inequality is meant to justify that finite-tree spectra converge to the Euclidean flat-band energy, it needs a proof or a precise reference. The later statement that convergence is 'in practice much faster' (e.g., the Husimi result in Eq. (76)) does not substitute for a rigorous statement of the general bound. This gap is directly relevant to the 'nearly flat bands' claim for finite trees.
  3. [§VII, first paragraph] The covering argument relies on a 'slightly more restrictive definition of local isomorphism' that includes triangles in the neighborhoods. The claim that the decorated trees constructed in Secs. III–VI are universal covers of the corresponding Euclidean lattices under this definition is not proved. In particular, for the Husimi and clique decorations, which contain loops (triangles/simplices), the existence of a covering map to the Euclidean kagome/star lattice should be established explicitly. Without this, the lifting step from Eq. (91) to Eq. (92) is not fully justified. This is part of the same load-bearing infinite-tree argument.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] Typo: 'Calyey tree' should be 'Cayley tree'.
  2. [§II B, after Eq. (16)] Duplicate article: 'the the shell-symmetric sector'.
  3. [§II, near Eq. (30)] Inconsistent abbreviation: 'CSLs' should be 'CLSs' for compact localized states.
  4. [Eq. (81b)] The Pauli decomposition is missing the σ_y factor on the d_y term; as written, the expression is dimensionally inconsistent.
  5. [Fig. 10 caption] Typo: 'correspondingle large' should be 'correspondingly large'.
  6. [§VIC] Typo: 'implitudes' should be 'amplitudes'.
  7. [References] Refs. [48] and [57] are the same paper (Bzdušek and Maciejko, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155146 (2022)); the duplication should be removed and citations renumbered.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central SSH mapping and degeneracy counts are derived from explicit sector Hamiltonians and verified against independent rank-nullity bounds.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The symmetry-adapted basis is constructed and proven complete in Sec. II and the Supplemental Material, yielding explicit sector Hamiltonians (e.g., Eqs. (29a,b), (42a,b), (67a,b), (80a,b)) without fitting any parameter to the target flat-band states. The correspondence to SSH / SSH3 chains is an exact operator mapping, and the identification of zero-energy edge states follows from the known topological properties of those 1D models (Refs. 59, 64, 65) rather than from the tree spectrum itself. The flat-band degeneracy (Eq. 39) is independently cross-checked against the rank-nullity lower bound (Eq. 37), which is an external linear-algebra theorem; the equality is a nontrivial verification, not a construction. Self-citations (Refs. 27, 48/57, 72) occur for the general method, the rank-nullity application, and naming, but the load-bearing content is re-derived in the paper or is standard, so these citations are not load-bearing. The only significant weakness is in Sec. VII: the covering lift defined by Eq. (94) is explicitly noted not to belong to ℓ² (text after Eq. (95)), so the claim of exact flat bands on infinite trees as square-integrable eigenstates is not established. This is a proof-gap/validity concern about the infinite-size limit, not a circular reduction of the result to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central machinery (symmetry-adapted basis, SSH mapping, rank-nullity counting) rests on standard math and on the tree's permutation symmetry; the only definitional flex is the enlarged-neighborhood covering map (Sec VII). No parameters are fitted to data anywhere; t1, t2, K, M are physical model inputs.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Rank-nullity theorem applied to bipartite sublattice imbalance
    Used in Secs IIIA, IIID, IVD to bound zero-mode (or transformed E=±1) degeneracy from |N_A − N_B|. Legitimate linear algebra, but the bound is saturated only via the symmetry-adapted basis, so the exact count also relies on the completeness argument in the SM.
  • domain assumption Permutation symmetry of (decorated) Cayley trees generates a complete block-diagonalizing symmetry-adapted basis
    The Hamiltonian commutes with cyclic permutations of branches (Sec IIA); block-diagonalization and completeness are asserted for each decoration and proven in the SM by state counting (e.g., Eq. S19–S21). Any error in the counting would change the flat-band degeneracy claims.
  • standard math SSH and SSH3 edge-state topology from prior literature
    Zero modes of the SSH chain and the trimer-SSH Zak/NSZP quantization (Refs 59, 64, 65) are imported as established results; the paper's mapping is exact, but the topological interpretation of the flat bands depends on these antecedents.
  • ad hoc to paper Restricted (enlarged-neighborhood) covering map definition
    Sec VII defines a covering map that preserves triangles/neighborhoods specifically so that lifts of CLSs remain eigenstates; the authors acknowledge that under the canonical covering definition the interference would be lost. That decorated Bethe lattices are universal covers is genuine, but the flat-band-persistence conclusion is sensitive to this definitional choice.
  • domain assumption Partial-isometry conditions Z†Z = I and YY† = I for the double-Lieb rank-nullity reduction
    Sec IVD requires N_L2 ≥ N_C, N_L2 ≥ N_L1 and unit hoppings to bring Eq. (57) into the chiral form (58); it holds only for the Case 0 and Case 2 terminations, which is exactly the scope of the resulting E=±1 bounds.
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbor tight-binding on loopless graphs with open/leaf boundaries
    All spectra are single-particle NN (plus one NNN analysis in Sec IIB) tight-binding models with open leaf boundaries; the termination parity (odd/even M) determines whether flat bands are exact, so the boundary choice is a load-bearing modeling assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological states and flat bands in exactly solvable decorated Cayley trees." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UCDTUCSU

@misc{pith2026251111261,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological states and flat bands in exactly solvable decorated Cayley trees},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UCDTUCSU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.11261}
}
read the original abstract

We derive the full spectrum of decorated Cayley trees that constitute tree analogs of selected two-dimensional Euclidean lattices; namely of the Lieb, the double Lieb, the kagome, and the star lattice. The common feature of these Euclidean lattices is that their nearest-neighbor models give rise to flat energy bands interpretable through compact localized states. We find that the tree analogs exhibit similar flat or nearly flat energy bands at the corresponding energies. Interestingly, such flat bands in the decorated Cayley trees acquire an interpretation that is absent in their Euclidean counterparts: as edge states localized to the inner or the outer boundary of the tree branches. In particular, we establish an exact correspondence between the Lieb-Cayley tree and an ensemble of one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, which maps topological edge states on one side of the chains to flat-band states localized in the bulk of the tree, furnishing the flat energy band with a topological stability. Similar mapping to topological edge states or to states bound to edge defects in one-dimensional chains is shown for flat-band states in all the considered tree decorations. We finally show that the persistence of exact flat bands on infinite decorated trees (i.e., Bethe lattices) arises naturally from a covering interpretation of tree graphs. Our findings reveal a rich landscape of flat-band and topological phenomena in non-Euclidean systems, where geometry alone can generate and stabilize unconventional quantum states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11261 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A Cayley tree with nearest and next-nearest neighbor hopping. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A sketch demonstrating the notation of the position basis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The bulk density of states of the NNN-hopping Calyey tree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (20 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectrum of a Cayley tree with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The Euclidean Lieb lattice: an additional site is placed at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spectrum of a Lieb-Cayley tree for two choices of the number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Atomic limits of two SSH chains with different total number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. We show two Lieb-Cayley trees with different numbers of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. An example of a zero-energy topological state hosted on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Spectrum of a Lieb-Cayley tree with an even number of shells [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Spectra of Lieb-Cayley trees with modulated hopping amplitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The spectra of Lieb-Cayley trees with an even vs. odd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. (a) The extended Lieb-lattice with the atomic sites of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The compact localized states that make up the two flat bands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Spectrum of a 2xLieb-Cayley tree for three choices of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: To count the imbalance of the entire lattice, one needs to consider triple shells as marked with gray-dashed circles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. On the left side we showcase examples of 1D chains de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. (a) Kagome lattice with the three sites of the unit cells [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Spectra of a small and a large Husimi-Cayley tree with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. The spectra of two Husimi-Cayley trees with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. (a) The star lattice is the line graph of the subdivision graph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Spectra of clique-Cayley trees with the same branching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. The clique-decorated tree in its infinite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_24.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Husimi-Lieb

    For an infinite Husimi-Cayley tree, i.e., in the absence of boundaries, the tree becomes𝑞-regular and it is expected to obey Eq. (72) exactly. Second, we consider the degeneracy of the flat band at 𝐸=−2predicted by Eq. (71). The difference between the edge count and the vertex count of the Cayley tree is easily found to beE−V=−1. This result can be seen i...

  2. [2]

    Weneglectmixingwiththebulkstates,sincetheyarefarin energy from the edge states for the SSH model. We can solve this effective Hamiltonian for its eigenvalues to find 𝐸±(𝐽)= 𝐽± √ 𝐽2+4𝛿 2 2 .(86a) For large𝐽, we can approximate 𝐸+(𝐽)≈𝐽+ 𝛿2 𝐽 , 𝐸 −(𝐽)≈− 𝛿2 𝐽 .(86b) This implies that one of the states remains close to𝐸=0 while the other moves with𝐽. However, ...

  3. [3]

    Georges and G

    A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Hubbard model in infinite dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. B45, 6479 (1992)

    1992

  4. [4]

    Jarrell, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys

    M. Jarrell, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 168 (1992)

    1992

  5. [5]

    Eckstein, M

    M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, K. Byczuk, and D. Vollhardt, Hopping on the Bethe lattice: Exact results for densities of states and dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B71, 235119 (2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    Kollar, M

    M. Kollar, M. Eckstein, K. Byczuk, N. Blümer, P. van Dongen, M. Radke de Cuba, W. Metzner, D. Tanasković, V. Dobrosavl- jević, G. Kotliar, and D. Vollhardt, Green functions for nearest- 28 and next-nearest-neighbor hopping on the Bethe lattice, Ann. Phys.517, 642 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    R.PetersandT.Pruschke,Half-filledHubbardmodelonaBethe lattice with next-nearest-neighbor hopping, Phys. Rev. B79, 045108 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    Semerjian, M

    G. Semerjian, M. Tarzia, and F. Zamponi, Exact solution of the Bose-Hubbard model on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B80, 014524 (2009)

    2009

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Lunts, A

    P. Lunts, A. Georges, E. M. Stoudenmire, and M. Fishman, HubbardmodelontheBethelatticeviavariationaluniformtree states: Metal-insulator transition and a Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023054 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Lepetit, M

    M.-B. Lepetit, M. Cousy, and G. M. Pastor, Density-matrix renormalization study of the Hubbard model on a Bethe lattice, Eur. Phys. J. B13, 421 (2000)

    2000

  3. [11]

    J.-L. Chen, Z. Fan, B. Zhan, J. Hu, T. Liu, J. Ji, K. Wang, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Thermodynamics of the Hubbard model on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B112, 125130 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    V.Bashmakov,A.Iliasov,T.Bzdušek,andA.A.Bagrov,Super- conductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Regular hyperbolic lattices and Ginzburg-Landau theory (2025), arXiv:2509.09330 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Pavliuk, T

    M. Pavliuk, T. Bzdušek, and A. Iliasov, Superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Cayley trees, hyperbolic continuum, and BCS theory (2025), arXiv:2510.26528 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2025

  6. [14]

    Vidal and R

    J. Vidal and R. Mosseri, Kitaev model in regular hyperbolic tilings (2025), arXiv:2506.17981 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  7. [15]

    D. J. Thouless, Spin-Glass on a Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1082 (1986)

    1986

  8. [16]

    Laumann, A

    C. Laumann, A. Scardicchio, and S. L. Sondhi, Cavity method for quantum spin glasses on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B78, 134424 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Mézard and G

    M. Mézard and G. Parisi, The Bethe lattice spin glass revisited, Eur. Phys. J. B20, 217 (2001)

    2001

  10. [18]

    Savitz, C

    S. Savitz, C. Peng, and G. Refael, Anderson localization on the Bethe lattice using cages and the Wegner flow, Phys. Rev. B 100, 094201 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Abou-Chacra, D

    R. Abou-Chacra, D. J. Thouless, and P. W. Anderson, A self- consistent theory of localization, J. Phys. C6, 1734 (1973)

    1973

  12. [20]

    Aizenman and S

    M. Aizenman and S. Warzel, The Canopy Graph and Level Statistics for Random Operators on Trees, J. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom.9, 291 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    T.RizzoandM.Tarzia,LocalizedphaseoftheAndersonmodel on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B110, 184210 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    T. P. Eggarter, Cayley trees, the Ising problem, and the thermo- dynamic limit, Phys. Rev. B9, 2989 (1974)

    1974

  15. [23]

    Bing and C

    H. Bing and C. Shu, Correlation Function of Potts Model on Bethe Lattice, Chin. Phys. Lett.17, 549 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    T. K. Kopeć and K. D. Usadel, Short-range±J interaction Ising spin glass in a transverse field on a Bethe lattice: a quantum- spherical approach, Phys. Status Solidi B243, 502 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Hu and N

    C.-K. Hu and N. S. Izmailian, Exact correlation functions of Bethelatticespinmodelsinexternalmagneticfields,Phys.Rev. E58, 1644 (1998)

    1998

  18. [26]

    K. S. Tikhonov and A. D. Mirlin, Fractality of wave functions on a Cayley tree: Difference between tree and locally treelike graph without boundary, Phys. Rev. B94, 184203 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Sonner, K

    M. Sonner, K. S. Tikhonov, and A. D. Mirlin, Multifractality of wavefunctionsonaCayleytree: Fromroottoleaves,Phys.Rev. B96, 214204 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Trauzettel, Non-Hermitian quantum fractals, Phys

    J.Sun,C.-A.Li,Q.Guo,W.Zhang,S.Feng,X.Zhang,H.Guo, and B. Trauzettel, Non-Hermitian quantum fractals, Phys. Rev. B110, L201103 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Hamanaka, A

    S. Hamanaka, A. A. Iliasov, T. Neupert, T. Bzdušek, and T. Yoshida, Multifractal statistics of non-Hermitian skin effect on the Cayley tree, Phys. Rev. B111, 075162 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    J.Sun,C.-A.Li,P.Li,S.Feng,andH.Guo,Innernon-Hermitian skineffectontheBethelattice,Phys.Rev.B111,075120(2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    N.Hatano,H.Katsura,andK.Kawabata,Quantumtransporton Bethe lattices with non-Hermitian sources and a drain (2024), arXiv:2409.01873 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    S. S. Gubser, J. Knaute, S. Parikh, A. Samberg, and P. Witaszczyk, p-Adic AdS/CFT, Commun. Math. Phys.352, 1019 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Manoj and V

    N. Manoj and V. B. Shenoy, Arboreal topological and fracton phases, Phys. Rev. B107, 165136 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    C.R.Laumann,S.A.Parameswaran,andS.L.Sondhi,Absence of Goldstone bosons on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B80, 144415 (2009)

    2009

  27. [35]

    O.Breach,B.Placke,P.W.Claeys,andS.Parameswaran,Solv- able Quantum Circuits inTree+1Dimensions, PRX Quantum 6, 040316 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Placke, G

    B. Placke, G. M. Sommers, N. P. Breuckmann, T. Rakovszky, and V. Khemani, Expansion creates spin-glass order in finite- connectivity models: a rigorous and intuitive approach from the theory of LDPC codes (2025), arXiv:2507.13342 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    15, 218 (2023)

    P.Basteiro,R.N.Das,G.D.Giulio,andJ.Erdmenger,Aperiodic spin chains at the boundary of hyperbolic tilings, SciPost Phys. 15, 218 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    G. D. Mahan, Energy bands of the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. B 63, 155110 (2001)

    2001

  31. [39]

    D.AryalandS.Kettemann,Completesolutionofthetightbind- ing model on a Cayley tree: strongly localised versus extended states, J. Phys. Commun.4, 105010 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Ostilli, C

    M. Ostilli, C. G. Bezerra, and G. M. Viswanathan, Spectrum of the tight-binding model on Cayley trees and comparison with Bethe lattices, Phys. Rev. E105, 034123 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    H.Yorikawa,DensityofstatesoftheCayleytree,J.Phys.Com- mun.2, 125009 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    X. Wang, Z. Nussinov, and G. Ortiz, Emergence of a Boundary-Sensitive Phase in Hyperbolic Ising Models (2025), arXiv:2507.21044 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  35. [43]

    F.R.LuxandE.Prodan,ConvergingPeriodicBoundaryCondi- tionsandDetectionofTopologicalGapsonRegularHyperbolic Tessellations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176603 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    S. Yu, X. Piao, and N. Park, Topological Hyperbolic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 053901 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    D. M. Urwyler, P. M. Lenggenhager, I. Boettcher, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, and T. Bzdušek, Hyperbolic Topological Band In- sulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 246402 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Liu, C.-B

    Z.-R. Liu, C.-B. Hua, T. Peng, and B. Zhou, Chern insulator in a hyperbolic lattice, Phys. Rev. B105, 245301 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Tao and Y

    Y.-L. Tao and Y. Xu, Higher-order topological hyperbolic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B107, 184201 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    A. Chen, Y. Guan, P. M. Lenggenhager, J. Maciejko, I. Boettcher, and T. Bzdušek, Symmetry and topology of hy- perbolic Haldane models, Phys. Rev. B108, 085114 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Tummuru, A

    T. Tummuru, A. Chen, P. M. Lenggenhager, T. Neupert, J. Ma- ciejko, and T. Bzdušek, Hyperbolic Non-Abelian Semimetal , Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 206601 (2024)

    2024

  42. [51]

    A.Westström,W.Duan,K.Yao,X.Wang,J.Liu,andJ.Li,Topo- logical Phases on Quantum Trees (2023), arXiv:2302.03166 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [52]

    G.Singh,S.Bera,andV.B.Shenoy,Arborealobstructedatomic 29 insulating and metallic phases of fermions, Phys. Rev. B110, 205143 (2024)

    2024

  44. [53]

    The Supplemental Material contains further information about the construction of symmetry-adapted basis states for Lieb- Cayley trees, 2xLieb-Cayley trees, Husimi-Cayley trees, and clique-Cayley trees

  45. [54]

    Petrova and R

    O. Petrova and R. Moessner, Coulomb potential𝑉(𝑟)=1/𝑟 problem on the Bethe lattice, Phys. Rev. E93, 012115 (2016)

    2016

  46. [55]

    D. R. DeFord and D. N. Rockmore, On the Spectrum of Fi- nite, Rooted Homogeneous Trees (2020), arXiv:1903.07134 [math.RT]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [56]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping models, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125104 (2008)

    2008

  48. [57]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1201 (1989)

    1989

  49. [58]

    M.Niţă,B.Ostahie,andA.Aldea,Spectralandtransportproper- tiesofthetwo-dimensionalLieblattice,Phys.Rev.B87,125428 (2013)

    2013

  50. [59]

    T.BzdušekandJ.Maciejko,Flatbandsandband-touchingfrom real-space topology in hyperbolic lattices, Phys. Rev. B106, 155146 (2022)

    2022

  51. [60]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B34, 5208 (1986)

    1986

  52. [61]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Poly- acetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  53. [62]

    Zhang, Y

    D. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Zhong, C. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and M. R. Belić, New edge-centered photonic square lattices with flat bands, Ann. Phys.382, 160 (2017)

    2017

  54. [63]

    A.BhattacharyaandB.Pal,Flatbandsandnontrivialtopological propertiesinanextendedLieblattice,Phys.Rev.B100,235145 (2019)

    2019

  55. [64]

    Rep.13, 12676 (2023)

    G.CentałaandJ.W.Kłos,Compactlocalizedstatesinmagnonic Lieb lattices, Sci. Rep.13, 12676 (2023)

    2023

  56. [65]

    Hanafi, P

    H. Hanafi, P. Menz, A. McWilliam, J. Imbrock, and C. Denz, Localized dynamics arising from multiple flat bands in a deco- rated photonic Lieb lattice, APL Photonics7, 111301 (2022)

    2022

  57. [66]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Edge states in trimer lattices, Phys. Rev. A99, 013833 (2019)

    2019

  58. [67]

    Anastasiadis, G

    A. Anastasiadis, G. Styliaris, R. Chaunsali, G. Theocharis, and F. K. Diakonos, Bulk-edge correspondence in the trimer Su- Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B106, 085109 (2022)

    2022

  59. [68]

    F.HararyandG.E.Uhlenbeck,OntheNumberofHusimiTrees, Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.39, 315 (1953)

    1953

  60. [69]

    H.-M.GuoandM.Franz,TopologicalinsulatorontheKagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B80, 113102 (2009)

    2009

  61. [70]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-Temperature Frac- tionalQuantumHallStates,Phys.Rev.Lett.106,236802(2011)

    2011

  62. [71]

    K.Ohgushi,S.Murakami,andN.Nagaosa,Spinanisotropyand quantum Hall effect in the kagomé lattice: Chiral spin state based on a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B62, R6065 (2000)

    2000

  63. [72]

    A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, P. Sarnak, and A. A. Houck, Line- Graph Lattices: Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Flat Bands, and Implementations in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics, Com- mun. Math. Phys.376, 1909 (2020)

    1909

  64. [73]

    Godsil and G

    C. Godsil and G. Royle,Algebraic Graph Theory, Graduate TextsinMathematics,Vol.207(Springer,NewYork,NY,2001)

    2001

  65. [74]

    W. P. Duss,Exploration of Topological Bands on Cayley Trees, Master’s thesis, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzer- land (2025)

    2025

  66. [75]

    H.YaoandS.A.Kivelson,ExactChiralSpinLiquidwithNon- Abelian Anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 247203 (2007)

    2007

  67. [76]

    W.-C. Chen, R. Liu, Y.-F. Wang, and C.-D. Gong, Topological quantumphasetransitionsandtopologicalflatbandsonthestar lattice, Phys. Rev. B86, 085311 (2012)

    2012

  68. [77]

    R. Fan, L. Sun, X. Shao, Y. Li, and M. Zhao, Two-dimensional Diracmaterials: Tight-bindinglatticemodelsandmaterialcan- didates, ChemPhysMater2, 30 (2023)

    2023

  69. [78]

    O.Rojas,GeometricallyfrustratedIsing-Heisenbergspinmodel on expanded Kagomé lattice, J. Magn. Magn. Mat473, 442 (2019)

    2019

  70. [79]

    A.J.Kollár,M.Fitzpatrick,andA.A.Houck,Hyperboliclattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature571, 45 (2019)

    2019

  71. [80]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, A. Vollhardt, M. Greiter, C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, H. Brand, T. Kießling, I. Boettcher, T. Neupert, R. Thomale, andT.Bzdušek,Simulatinghyperbolicspaceonacircuitboard, Nat. Commun.13, 4373 (2022)

    2022

  72. [81]

    Boettcher, P

    I. Boettcher, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov,Quantumsimulationofhyperbolicspacewithcircuit quantumelectrodynamics: Fromgraphstogeometry,Phys.Rev. A102, 032208 (2020)

    2020

  73. [82]

    S. Dey, A. Chen, P. Basteiro, A. Fritzsche, M. Greiter, M. Kaminski, P. M. Lenggenhager, R. Meyer, R. Sorbello, A.Stegmaier,R.Thomale,J.Erdmenger,andI.Boettcher,Sim- ulating Holographic Conformal Field Theories on Hyperbolic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 061603 (2024)

    2024

  74. [83]

    Johnstone, M

    D. Johnstone, M. J. Colbrook, A. E. B. Nielsen, P. Öhberg, and C. W. Duncan, Bulk localized transport states in infinite and finitequasicrystalsviamagneticaperiodicity,Phys.Rev.B106, 045149 (2022)

    2022

  75. [84]

    F.Balling-Ansø,J.L.Krogh,E.E.Lassen,andA.E.B.Nielsen, Identification and Properties of Topological States in the Bulk of Quasicrystals (2025), arXiv:2507.20722 [quant-ph]

    2025

  76. [85]

    Boyle, M

    L. Boyle, M. Dickens, and F. Flicker, Conformal Quasicrystals and Holography, Phys. Rev. X10, 011009 (2020)

    2020

  77. [86]

    Boyle and J

    L. Boyle and J. Kulp, Holographic foliations: Self-similar quasicrystals from hyperbolic honeycombs, Phys. Rev. D111, 046001 (2025). Supplemental Material for Topological states and flat bands in exactly solvable decorated Cayley trees Wanda P. Duss,∗ Askar Iliasov,† and Tomáš...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.