Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Fracture initiation in silicate glasses is controlled by whether plastic shear flow localizes into shear bands, not by densification or Poisson's ratio.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 09:11 UTC pith:UEK7UZJH

load-bearing objection A systematic and mostly convincing case that shear localization, not densification, controls indentation crack initiation in these silicate glasses—but the fixed 1 kgf cross-section leaves a real load-level confound, and the MD support is thinner than the abstract suggests. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.14493 v1 pith:UEK7UZJH submitted 2026-01-20 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Fracture initiation in silicate glasses via a universal shear localization mechanism

Matthieu Bourguignon , Gustavo Alberto Rosales-Sosa , Yoshinari Kato , Bruno Bresson , Hikaru Ikeda , Shingo Nakane , Gergely Moln\'ar , Hiroki Yamazaki
show 1 more author
Etienne Barthel
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords shear bandscrack resistancesilicate glassesVickers indentationdensificationstrain localizationmolecular dynamicsaluminoborosilicate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that crack initiation in silicate glasses under sharp contact is set by whether plastic shear flow localizes into discrete shear bands, rather than by densification or Poisson's ratio. In two aluminoborosilicate glass families, crack resistance varies by more than an order of magnitude while densification and elastic properties barely move; the quantity that tracks the crack threshold is the morphology of shear bands beneath Vickers indents. Crack-resistant glasses deform via fine, diffuse shear bands with small slip, while crack-sensitive glasses develop coarse, large-slip shear faults. Molecular dynamics simulations show that boron and magnesium suppress strain softening, which inhibits localization, matching the experimental trend. The paper concludes that silicate glasses follow the same shear-localization mechanism of rupture as metallic glasses and glassy polymers.

Core claim

The central finding is an anticorrelation between indentation crack resistance and the prominence of shear bands in the plastically deformed zone. Cross-sections of 1 kgf Vickers indents show a gradual transition from a regular network of shear faults in the boron- and magnesium-free glass to a homogeneous, shear-band-free plastic zone in high-boron, high-magnesium compositions; crack resistance rises from about 300 gf to over 3000 gf along the same series. Quantitatively, surface roughness across the plastic zone decreases with increasing crack resistance, and the spacing between shear bands also decreases, meaning deformation is distributed over more, finer slip events. Molecular dynamics

What carries the argument

The central object is the shear band as revealed by bonded-interface indentation cross-sections: shear bands intersect the pre-existing crack plane as slip steps, so their density and slip amplitude can be quantified by standard roughness parameters (Ra and RSm). These measurements provide a direct mechanical readout of how much plastic shear flow localized during loading. The supporting mechanism is strain softening in shear, computed by molecular statics: compositions with a pronounced yield drop are prone to localization, while compositions with a broad, flat flow curve deform homogeneously.

Load-bearing premise

The cross-sections are taken from 1 kgf indents, but crack resistance spans roughly 0.3 to 3.35 kgf; for the fragile glasses this load already produces cracks, so the observed shear-band patterns may be partly consequences of cracking rather than causes.

What would settle it

Indent a low-crack-resistance glass at a load below its crack initiation threshold, cut a cross-section, and count shear bands; if the same coarse shear faulting appears without any crack present, the correlation is causal. If shear faulting disappears when cracks are suppressed, the link is an artifact.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Crack resistance in these glasses is governed by the intrinsic resistance to localized shear faulting, so composition design should target diffusing shear localization rather than maximizing densification.
  • Boron-for-silicon and magnesium-for-calcium substitutions act as two independent routes to suppress shear localization and improve crack resistance.
  • The correlation extends to commercial silicate glasses, so the mechanism is not restricted to the laboratory compositions.
  • Silicate glasses, bulk metallic glasses, and glassy polymers can be described within the same shear-localization framework for fracture initiation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests a practical screening test: measure shear-band roughness on cross-sections at a fixed subcritical load to rank candidate compositions, without needing full crack-resistance curves.
  • The molecular dynamics results imply a quantitative, testable link: composition-dependent strain-softening amplitude could be used as a surrogate predictor of crack resistance across a much wider composition space.
  • A direct way to separate cause from effect is to image shear bands at loads below the crack threshold in low-crack-resistance glasses; if coarse shear faulting appears there too, the initiation link is confirmed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates indentation-induced fracture in eighteen aluminoborosilicate glasses spanning two compositional families: Ca-aluminoborosilicate glasses with varying B2O3/SiO2 ratio, and mixed Ca/Mg aluminoborosilicate glasses with varying Mg/Ca ratio. It reports Young's modulus, hardness, Poisson's ratio, densification via recovered indentation depth (RID), crack resistance (CR), bonded-interface cross-sections at 1 kgf, roughness measurements at 1 kgf and 500 gf, and molecular dynamics shear stress–strain curves for the boron series. The central claim is that crack resistance is governed by the propensity for plastic shear localization—glasses that deform via coarse, sparse shear bands have low CR, while glasses that deform homogeneously have high CR—and that this is largely independent of Poisson's ratio and densification. The authors interpret this as a universal shear-localization mechanism of rupture initiation shared with bulk metallic glasses and glassy polymers.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would refocus compositional design of crack-resistant silicate glasses away from densification-based strategies and toward controlling shear localization, which is a potentially important shift. The study has notable strengths: two independent compositional series, quantitative roughness metrics, comparison with commercial glasses, and MD simulations using the literature SHIK potential with no parameters fitted to the measured crack resistance. The correlation between shear-band prominence and low CR is visually compelling and internally consistent across the two strengthening routes. However, the central causal inference is threatened by a load-level confound in the cross-section data, and the MD support covers only one of the two compositional routes.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II.C, Figs. 3–4; §II.D, Fig. 5d] The headline inference—that intrinsic shear-localization propensity controls crack initiation—rests on cross-sections and roughness measured at 1 kgf (Figs. 3–4) and 500 gf (Fig. 5d), while CR spans approximately 300 gf (CAS) to 3350 gf (CMABS9). At 1 kgf, low-CR glasses are already cracked; CABS2 (CR≈900 gf) shows both median and lateral cracks in Fig. 4a. Crack propagation and crack-tip stresses can relax, generate, or amplify shear features after fracture, so the observed anti-correlation between CR and shear-band prominence may be partly a post-fracture artifact rather than evidence about initiation. The 500 gf dataset does not remove this confound because CAS and CABS2 have CR below 500 gf. Please provide subcritical-load cross-sections for all compositions, or otherwise demonstrate that pre-existing cracks do not alter the measured shear-band morphology.
  2. [§II.E, Fig. 6] Molecular dynamics results are presented only for the boron series (Ca aluminosilicate glasses with increasing B2O3), yet the abstract and conclusion generalize the MD finding to 'composition dependence' and 'closely mirroring' the experimental propensity for strain localization. The Mg-for-Ca substitution is a second, independent route to high CR in this study; without MD for that series, the atomistic support for the universal claim is incomplete. Either add simulations for the Mg-substituted series or restrict the MD-based claim to the boron route.
  3. [§II.B–C, Figs. 2c and 5c–e] The paper states that CR shows 'no significant dependence' on Poisson's ratio or RID and 'correlates strongly' with roughness, but no correlation coefficients, p-values, or confidence intervals are reported. Fig. 2c appears to show a weak negative trend, and Figs. 5c–e are visually dominated by a few high-CR compositions. Please provide quantitative regression/statistical tests, including an equivalence or interval estimate for the null effects, to support these load-bearing claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§I, first paragraph] Typo: 'withe.g.metallic' should be 'with, e.g., metallic'.
  2. [§II.A and Fig. 1c] The text states densification was measured with a diamond anvil cell (DAC), but the Fig. 1c caption says 'Multi Anvil Cell'. Please reconcile the description.
  3. [§II.D] The text describes the roughness ratio of approximately 1.2 between 1 kgf and 500 gf as 'consistent with the √2 scaling'; 1.2 is substantially below √2≈1.414. Provide uncertainty on this ratio or revise the statement.
  4. [§II.C] The description 'indentation over a pre-existing crack near the crack tip, followed by full crack opening' is confusing for the bonded-interface technique. The standard description is indentation across a bonded polished interface followed by separation of the halves.
  5. [Figures 3 and 5] Figure 3 caption should read 'Summary' rather than 'Sum up'. In addition, error bars for Ra and RSm (Fig. 5) and for the MD curves (Fig. 6) would improve the assessment of scatter.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: CR, roughness, and MD shear response are measured independently with no fitted parameters targeted to the headline correlation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular by the standards of this review. Crack resistance is defined operationally as the load at 50% radial-crack probability (Sec. II.B). Shear-band activity is quantified from bonded-interface cross-sections via Ra and RSm (Sec. II.D), which are independent measurements, not derived from CR. The MD stress-strain curves (Fig. 6) are generated with the literature SHIK potential [49] and are described as calculated using the protocol of [44]; no parameter is adjusted to reproduce the measured CR values. The central inference linking reduced strain softening to reduced shear localization is supported by these independent simulations and by the experimental cross-sections, and no uniqueness theorem or self-citation is invoked to force the conclusion. The concern that 1 kgf cross-sections may be supercritical for low-CR glasses (so cracking itself could contribute to roughness) is an experimental validity/confounding question about causal direction, not a circularity in the sense of a prediction being equivalent to its inputs by construction or a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. Since no equation-level reduction or fitted-input renaming is present, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the target data—a point in the paper's favor: CR is an operational definition (load at PCI=50%), Ra/RSm are direct measurements, and the MD uses the literature SHIK potential untouched. The central correlational claims rest instead on six domain assumptions about what the measurements mean (RID=densification; cross-section roughness=shear-band activity; molecular-statics softening=indentation localization; comparable literature protocols). The most fragile is the roughness proxy combined with the fixed-load cross-section protocol. No invented entities are introduced.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption RID (recovered indentation depth after annealing at 0.9Tg for 2h) is a faithful proxy for indentation-induced densification.
    Eq. (1) and Sec. II.A: the paper's claim that crack resistance is independent of densification rests on RID being nearly constant (~0.3) across compositions. RID is the standard proxy in the field (refs 9, 17, 29), but it conflates densification with other recoverable strain components, and the paper's own Fig. 2c shows opposing CR–RID slopes between this dataset and literature commercial glasses.
  • domain assumption Cross-sections from the bonded-interface technique reproduce the deformation field of an un-sectioned indent.
    Sec. II.C: indentation over a pre-existing crack, followed by crack opening, is used to expose the plastic zone. The pre-crack and the section plane can perturb the stress field compared to a bulk indent; the technique is established (refs 23, 33) but the perturbation is not quantified.
  • domain assumption Surface roughness Ra and characteristic spacing RSm of the cross-section scale monotonically with shear-band slip activity.
    Sec. II.D: shear bands intersect crack faces as slip steps, and Ra/RSm are used as quantitative measures of shear-band activity. No independent calibration links Ra/RSm to band density or slip amplitude, and roughness may include contributions from polishing, crack-face damage, and topographic features unrelated to shear bands.
  • domain assumption A reduced post-yield stress drop (strain softening) implies reduced shear-band localization and higher crack resistance.
    Sec. II.E: 'the localization of mechanical deformation requires a reduction in either strength or stiffness. Compositions exhibiting weaker softening are therefore less prone to shear-band formation.' This causal linchpin connecting MD stress-strain curves to indentation cracking is asserted qualitatively, without a derived stability or localization criterion.
  • domain assumption Molecular-statics shear response of SHIK-potential model glasses at the simulated quench state represents room-temperature indentation plasticity.
    Sec. II.E + SM S II: the strain-softening amplitude is compared qualitatively with experimental CR; no transfer protocol (pressure, strain rate, structural relaxation, indentation strain field) is specified to map the simulated pure-shear response to the indentation plastic zone.
  • domain assumption Literature CR/RID and CR/Ra data from Kato et al. (refs 9, 31) and Barlet et al. (ref 18) merged into Figs. 2c and 5c were measured under comparable protocols.
    Fig. 2c: the opposing CR–RID slopes between this dataset and literature data are reconciled by declaring the densification correlation 'only partial'; protocol differences (humidity, annealing schedule, load ranges, CR definition) between laboratories are not discussed.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12065 in / 20605 out tokens · 226962 ms · 2026-08-03T09:11:14.987698+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Shear bands lie at the root of fracture initiation in bulk metallic glasses and amorphous polymers. For silicate glasses, in contrast, studies have largely emphasized permanent volumetric strain, commonly referred to as densification. Here we systematically investigate indentation-induced fracture in two distinct families of aluminoborosilicate glasses. The results demonstrate that plastic shear flow plays a decisive role in governing fracture initiation. In addition, molecular dynamics simulations reveal a pronounced composition dependence of softening associated with plastic shear flow, closely mirroring the experimentally observed propensity for strain localization. We conclude that silicate glasses conform to a universal pattern of rupture initiation governed by localization of shear-deformation, aligning with a broad range of amorphous materials, including bulk metallic glasses and glassy polymers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.14493 by Bruno Bresson, Etienne Barthel, Gergely Moln\'ar, Gustavo Alberto Rosales-Sosa, Hikaru Ikeda, Hiroki Yamazaki, Matthieu Bourguignon, Shingo Nakane, Yoshinari Kato.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a-c) single alkaline earth (Ca or Mg) ABS glasses with varying B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a-b) crack resistance CR of (a) single alkaline earth network modifier ABS glasses and (b) mixed alkaline earth network modifiers ABS glasses. If no error bar is shown, it is less than the markers size - (c) crack resistance (CR) as a function of recovered indentation depth (RID) - (d) recovered indentation depth for different silicate glasses compositions including some (LS, SLS, ABS) from Kato et al [31… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sum up of all cross-sections through 1 kgf Vickers indents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cross-sections through 1 kgf Vickers indents in (a) CABS2, (b) CMABS4, (c) CABS3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Scanning Electron image of 1kgf Vickers indentation cross-section in soda-lime silicate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stress-strain curves in shear for Ca alumino silicate glasses with increasing boron content. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wondraczek, E

    L. Wondraczek, E. Bouchbinder, A. Ehrlicher, J. C. Mauro, R. Sajzew, and M. M. Smedskjaer, Advancing the mechanical performance of glasses: Perspectives and challenges, Advanced Materials34, 10.1002/adma.202109029 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202109029 2022

  2. [2]

    Januchta and M

    K. Januchta and M. M. Smedskjaer, Indentation deformation in oxide glasses: Quantification, structural changes, and relation to cracking, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X1, 100007 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Wondraczek, J

    L. Wondraczek, J. C. Mauro, J. Eckert, U. K¨ uhn, J. Horbach, J. Deubener, and T. Rouxel, Towards ultrastrong glasses, Advanced Materials23, 4578 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Rouxel, J.-i

    T. Rouxel, J.-i. Jang, and U. Ramamurty, Indentation of glasses, Progress in Materials Science 121, 100834 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Januchta, R

    K. Januchta, R. E. Youngman, A. Goel, M. Bauchy, S. L. Logunov, S. J. Rzoska, M. Bockowski, L. R. Jensen, and M. M. Smedskjaer, Discovery of ultra-crack-resistant oxide glasses with adaptive networks, Chemistry of Materials29, 5865 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    D. B. Marshall, R. F. Cook, N. P. Padture, M. L. Oyen, A. Pajares, J. E. Bradby, I. E. Reimanis, R. Tandon, T. F. Page, G. M. Pharr,et al., The compelling case for indentation as a functional exploratory and characterization tool, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 98, 2671 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Wada, Crack resistance of glass on vickers indentation, inProc X Int Congr Glass(1974) pp

    M. Wada, Crack resistance of glass on vickers indentation, inProc X Int Congr Glass(1974) pp. 39–46

    1974

  8. [8]

    B. R. Lawn, A. G. Evans, and D. B. Marshall, Elastic/plastic indentation damage in ceramics: The median/radial crack system, Journal of the American Ceramic Society63, 574 (1980). 18

    1980

  9. [9]

    Y. Kato, H. Yamazaki, S. Yoshida, and J. Matsuoka, Effect of densification on crack initiation under vickers indentation test, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids356, 1768 (2010)

    2010

  10. [10]

    B. R. Lawn and E. R. Fuller, Equilibrium penny-like cracks in indentation fracture, Journal of Materials Science10, 2016 (1975)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Chiang, D

    S. Chiang, D. Marshall, and A. Evans, The response of solids to elastic/plastic indentation. i. stresses and residual stresses, Journal of Applied Physics53, 298 (1982)

    1982

  12. [12]

    B. C. Davis, G. S. Glaesemann, and I. Reimanis, Sharp indentation stress fields in fused silica: Finite element analysis and yoffe analytic model, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 103, 7135 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    G. A. Rosales-Sosa, E. Barthel, Y. Kato, M. Bourguignon, A. Yamada, T. Inoue, S. Nakane, and H. Yamazaki, Indentation stress fields in brittle materials: A micro-photoelastic investi- gation in silicate glasses, Acta Materialia292, 120973 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    F. M. Ernsberger, Role of densification in deformation of glasses under point loading, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.51, 545 (1968)

    1968

  15. [15]

    Yoffe, Elastic stress fields caused by indenting brittle materials, Philosophical Magazine A 46, 617 (1982)

    E. Yoffe, Elastic stress fields caused by indenting brittle materials, Philosophical Magazine A 46, 617 (1982)

    1982

  16. [16]

    L. M. Cook, Chemical processes in glass polishing, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids120, 152 (1990)

    1990

  17. [17]

    T. Rouxel, Driving force for indentation cracking in glass: composition, pressure and temper- ature dependence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences373, 20140140 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Barlet, J.-M

    M. Barlet, J.-M. Delaye, T. Charpentier, M. Gennisson, D. Bonamy, T. Rouxel, and C. L. Rountree, Hardness and toughness of sodium borosilicate glasses via vickers’s indentations, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids417, 66 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    Yoshida, Compositional variation of indentation-induced deformation and cracking in glass, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan128, 340 (2020)

    S. Yoshida, Compositional variation of indentation-induced deformation and cracking in glass, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan128, 340 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Hagan, Micromechanics of crack nucleation during indentations, Journal of Materials Sci- ence14, 2975 (1979)

    J. Hagan, Micromechanics of crack nucleation during indentations, Journal of Materials Sci- ence14, 2975 (1979)

    1979

  21. [21]

    B. R. Lawn, T. P. Dabbs, and C. J. Fairbanks, Kinetics of shear-activated indentation crack initiation in soda-lime glass, Journal of Materials Science18, 2785 (1983). 19

    1983

  22. [22]

    Lathabai, J

    S. Lathabai, J. R¨ odel, T. Dabbs, and B. R. Lawn, Fracture mechanics model for subthreshold indentation flaws: Part i equilibrium fracture, Journal of Materials Science26, 2157 (1991)

    1991

  23. [23]

    Gross, J

    T. Gross, J. Wu, D. Baker, J. Price, and R. Yongsunthon, Crack-resistant glass with high shear band density, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids494, 13 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Y. Kato, H. Yamazaki, Y. Kubo, S. Yoshida, J. Matsuoka, and T. Akai, Effect of b2o3 content on crack initiation under vickers indentation test, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan 118, 792 (2010)

    2010

  25. [25]

    Osada, A

    K. Osada, A. Yamada, T. Ohuchi, S. Yoshida, and J. Matsuoka, Transition in deformation mechanism of aluminosilicate glass at high pressure and room temperature, Journal of the American Ceramic Society103, 6755 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    A. L. Fry, A. L. Ogrinc, S. H. Kim, and J. C. Mauro, Field strength effect on elastoplastic behavior of aluminoborosilicate glass: Ii. volumetric recovery, Journal of the American Ceramic Society106, 5213 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Y. H. F. Gomes, G. A. Rosales-Sosa, S. Nakane, Y. Kato, H. Yamazaki, A. Yamada, and H. Eckert, Structural changes upon ambient temperature densification in calcium alumi- noborosilicate glasses: Relation to indentation crack resistance, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry C129, 18772 (2025)

    2025

  28. [29]

    Yoshida, J.-C

    S. Yoshida, J.-C. Sangleboeuf, and T. Rouxel, Quantitative evaluation of indentation-induced densification in glass, J. Mater. Res.20, 1 (2005)

    2005

  29. [30]

    Rouxel, H

    T. Rouxel, H. Ji, T. Hammouda, and A. Moreac, Poisson’s ratio and the densification of glass under high pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 225501 (2008)

    2008

  30. [31]

    Y. Kato, H. Yamazaki, S. Itakura, S. Yoshida, and J. Matsuoka, Load dependence of densifi- cation in glass during vickers indentation test, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan119, 110 (2011)

    2011

  31. [32]

    Sellappan, T

    P. Sellappan, T. Rouxel, F. Celarie, E. Becker, P. Houizot, and R. Conradt, Composition dependence of indentation deformation and indentation cracking in glass, Acta Materialia61, 5949 (2013). 20

    2013

  32. [33]

    J. T. Hagan, Shear deformation under pyramidal indentations in soda-lime glass, J. Mater. Sci.15, 1417 (1980)

    1980

  33. [34]

    Chen and J.-F

    K.-W. Chen and J.-F. Lin, Investigation of the relationship between primary and secondary shear bands induced by indentation in bulk metallic glasses, International Journal of Plasticity 26, 1645 (2010)

    2010

  34. [35]

    Schuh, T

    C. Schuh, T. Hufnagel, and U. Ramamurty, Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys, Acta Materialia55, 4067 (2007)

    2007

  35. [36]

    Shi and M

    Y. Shi and M. L. Falk, Strain localization and percolation of stable structure in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 095502 (2005)

    2005

  36. [37]

    S ¸opu, A

    D. S ¸opu, A. Stukowski, M. Stoica, and S. Scudino, Atomic-level processes of shear band nucleation in metallic glasses, Physical Review Letters119, 195503 (2017)

    2017

  37. [38]

    Barbot, M

    A. Barbot, M. Lerbinger, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, D. Vandembroucq, and S. Patinet, Rejuvenation and shear banding in model amorphous solids, Physical Review E101, 033001 (2020), arXiv:1906.09663v2[cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [39]

    Richard, M

    D. Richard, M. Ozawa, S. Patinet, E. Stanifer, B. Shang, S. A. Ridout, B. Xu, G. Zhang, P. K. Morse, J.-L. Barrat, L. Berthier, M. L. Falk, P. Guan, A. J. Liu, K. Martens, S. Sastry, D. Vandembroucq, E. Lerner, and M. L. Manning, Predicting plasticity in disordered solids from structural indicators, Physical Review Materials4, 113609 (2020)

    2020

  39. [40]

    Ozawa, L

    M. Ozawa, L. Berthier, G. Biroli, A. Rosso, and G. Tarjus, Random critical point separates brittle and ductile yielding transitions in amorphous materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 6656 (2018)

    2018

  40. [41]

    Mantisi, G

    B. Mantisi, G. Kermouche, E. Barthel, and A. Tanguy, Impact of pressure on plastic yield in amorphous solids with open structure, Phys. Rev. E93, 033001 (2016)

    2016

  41. [42]

    Moln´ ar, P

    G. Moln´ ar, P. Ganster, A. Tanguy, E. Barthel, and G. Kermouche, Densification dependent yield criteria for sodium silicate glasses – an atomistic simulation approach, Acta Materialia 111, 129 (2016)

    2016

  42. [43]

    Yuan and L

    F. Yuan and L. Huang, Brittle to ductile transition in densified silica glass, Scientific Reports 4, 10.1038/srep05035 (2014)

    doi:10.1038/srep05035 2014

  43. [44]

    Moln´ ar, P

    G. Moln´ ar, P. Ganster, and A. Tanguy, Effect of composition and pressure on the shear strength of sodium silicate glasses: An atomic scale simulation study, Physical Review E95, 043001 (2017). 21

    2017

  44. [45]

    Deng and J

    L. Deng and J. Du, Development of boron oxide potentials for computer simulations of mul- ticomponent oxide glasses, Journal of the American Ceramic Society102, 2482 (2018)

    2018

  45. [46]

    H. Liu, B. Deng, S. Sundararaman, Y. Shi, and L. Huang, Understanding the response of aluminosilicate and aluminoborate glasses to sharp contact loading using molecular dynamics simulation, Journal of Applied Physics128, 10.1063/5.0013555 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0013555 2020

  46. [47]

    K. Lee, Y. Yang, L. Ding, B. Ziebarth, M. J. Davis, and J. C. Mauro, Plasticity of borosilicate glasses under uniaxial tension, Journal of the American Ceramic Society103, 4295 (2020)

    2020

  47. [48]

    K. Lee, Y. Yang, L. Ding, B. Ziebarth, M. J. Davis, and J. C. Mauro, Pressure effects on shear deformation of borosilicate glasses, Journal of the American Ceramic Society104, 3073 (2021)

    2021

  48. [49]

    Y.-T. Shih, S. Sundararaman, S. Ispas, and L. Huang, New interaction potentials for alkaline earth silicate and borate glasses, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids565, 120853 (2021)

    2021

  49. [50]

    Lawn and A

    B. Lawn and A. Evans, A model for crack initiation in elastic/plastic indentation fields, J. Mater. Sci.12, 2195–2199 (1977)

    1977

  50. [51]

    S. S. Chiang, D. B. Marshall, and A. G. Evans, The response of solids to elastic/plastic indentation. ii. fracture initiation, Journal of Applied Physics53, 312 (1982)

    1982

  51. [52]

    G. Feng, S. Qu, Y. Huang, and W. Nix, An analytical expression for the stress field around an elastoplastic indentation/contact, Acta Mater.55, 2929 (2007)

    2007

  52. [53]

    Barthel, V

    E. Barthel, V. Keryvin, G. Rosales-Sosa, and G. Kermouche, Indentation cracking in silicate glasses is directed by shear flow, not by densification, Acta Materialia194, 473 (2020)

    2020

  53. [54]

    Peter, Densification and flow phenomena of glass in indentation experiments, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids5, 103 (1970)

    K. Peter, Densification and flow phenomena of glass in indentation experiments, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids5, 103 (1970)

    1970

  54. [55]

    Arora, D

    A. Arora, D. Marshall, B. Lawn, and M. Swain, Indentation deformation/fracture of normal and anomalous glasses, J. Non-Cryst. Solids31, 415 (1979)

    1979

  55. [56]

    Kermouche, G

    G. Kermouche, G. Guillonneau, J. Michler, J. Teisseire, and E. Barthel, Perfectly plastic flow in silica glass, Acta Materialia114, 146 (2016)

    2016

  56. [57]

    J. B. C. Wu and J. C. M. Li, Slip processes in the deformation of polystyrene, Journal of Materials Science11, 434 (1976)

    1976

  57. [58]

    C. B. Bucknall,Toughened plastics, edited by A. S. Publishers (1977)

    1977

  58. [59]

    A. S. Argon,The physics of deformation and fracture of polymers(2013)

    2013

  59. [60]

    Argon, Plastic deformation in metallic glasses, Acta Metallurgica27, 47 (1979)

    A. Argon, Plastic deformation in metallic glasses, Acta Metallurgica27, 47 (1979). 22

    1979

  60. [61]

    J. Li, F. Spaepen, and T. C. Hufnagel, Nanometre-scale defects in shear bands in a metallic glass, Philosophical Magazine A82, 2623 (2002)

    2002

  61. [62]

    Nicolas, E

    A. Nicolas, E. Ferrero, K. Martens, and J.-L. Barrat, Deformation and flow of amorphous solids: An updated review of mesoscale elastoplastic models, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 045006 (2018), arXiv:1708.09194v4[cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [63]

    T¨ onnies, R

    D. T¨ onnies, R. Maaß, and C. A. Volkert, Room temperature homogeneous ductility of micrometer-sized metallic glass, Advanced Materials26, 5715 (2014)

    2014

  63. [64]

    work-hardenable

    J. Das, M. B. Tang, K. B. Kim, R. Theissmann, F. Baier, W. H. Wang, and J. Eckert, “work-hardenable” ductile bulk metallic glass, Physical Review Letters94, 205501 (2005)

    2005

  64. [65]

    D. C. Hofmann, J.-Y. Suh, A. Wiest, G. Duan, M.-L. Lind, M. D. Demetriou, and W. L. Johnson, Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility, Nature451, 1085 (2008)

    2008

  65. [66]

    M. Chen, A. Inoue, W. Zhang, and T. Sakurai, Extraordinary plasticity of ductile bulk metallic glasses, Physical Review Letters96, 245502 (2006)

    2006

  66. [67]

    Friedrich, Crazes and shear bands in semi-crystalline thermoplastics, inCrazing in Poly- mers, edited by H

    K. Friedrich, Crazes and shear bands in semi-crystalline thermoplastics, inCrazing in Poly- mers, edited by H. H. Kausch (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983) pp. 225–274

    1983

  67. [68]

    P. B. Bowden and S. Raha, The formation of micro shear bands in polystyrene and poly- methylmethacrylate, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics22, 463 (1970)

    1970

  68. [69]

    Lazzeri and C

    A. Lazzeri and C. Bucknall, Applications of a dilatational yielding model to rubber-toughened polymers, Polymer36, 2895 (1995)

    1995

  69. [70]

    B. R. Lawn, A. G. Evans, and D. Marshall, Elastic/plastic indentation damage in ceramics: the median/radial crack system, Journal of the American Ceramic Society63, 574 (1980)

    1980

  70. [71]

    Ritter, M

    J. Ritter, M. Lin, and T. Lardner, Strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) with indentation flaws, Journal of Materials Science23, 2370 (1988)

    1988

  71. [72]

    X. Ke, Z. Shan, Z. Li, Y. Tao, Y. Yue, and H. Tao, Toward hard and highly crack resis- tant magnesium aluminosilicate glasses and transparent glass-ceramics, Journal of the Amer- ican Ceramic Society103, 3600 (2020)

    2020

  72. [73]

    Tanguy, Elasto-plastic behavior of amorphous materials: a brief review, Comptes Rendus

    A. Tanguy, Elasto-plastic behavior of amorphous materials: a brief review, Comptes Rendus. Physique22, 117 (2021). 23

    2021

  73. [74]

    J. J. Lewandowski, W. H. Wang, and A. L. Greer, Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses, Philosophical Magazine Letters85, 77 (2005)

    2005

  74. [75]

    Qiao and J

    J. Qiao and J. Pelletier, Dynamic mechanical relaxation in bulk metallic glasses: A review, Journal of Materials Science & Technology30, 523 (2014)

    2014

  75. [76]

    Bauchy, B

    M. Bauchy, B. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Yu, M. J. Abdolhosseini Qomi, M. M. Smedskjaer, C. Bichara, F.-J. Ulm, and R. Pellenq, Fracture toughness anomalies: Viewpoint of topo- logical constraint theory, Acta Materialia121, 234 (2016)

    2016

  76. [77]

    Berthier, G

    L. Berthier, G. Biroli, L. Manning, and F. Zamponi, Yielding and plasticity in amorphous solids, Nature Reviews Physics7, 313 (2025), arXiv:2401.09385v1[cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [78]

    Atila, S

    A. Atila, S. V. Sukhomlinov, M. J. Honecker, and M. H. M¨ user, Plasticity of metallic glasses dictated by their state at the fragile-to-strong transition temperature, Acta Materialia286, 120753 (2025). 24

    2025