Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13219 v2 pith:UEM7MCZ7 submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CV cs.CL

MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency

classification cs.CV cs.CL
keywords knowledgemultimodaleditingbenchmarkconsistencyerrorsmc-mkemodality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, which can manifest as misreading and misrecognition errors due to the complexity of multimodal knowledge. Previous benchmarks have not systematically analyzed the performance of editing methods in correcting these two error types. To better represent and correct these errors, we decompose multimodal knowledge into its visual and textual components. Different error types correspond to different editing formats, which edit distinct parts of the multimodal knowledge. We present MC-MKE, a fine-grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing benchmark emphasizing Modality Consistency. Our benchmark facilitates independent correction of misreading and misrecognition errors by editing the corresponding knowledge component. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces Latent Adversarial Robustification and Rank-Constrained Subspace Learning to enable robust generalization in multimodal knowledge editing through adversarial subspace alignment.

  2. CrossCult-KIBench: A Benchmark for Cross-Cultural Knowledge Insertion in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CrossCult-KIBench provides 9,800 test cases for cross-cultural knowledge insertion in MLLMs and shows that existing methods cannot reliably adapt to one culture while preserving behavior in others.

  3. CrossCult-KIBench: A Benchmark for Cross-Cultural Knowledge Insertion in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CrossCult-KIBench is a new benchmark for evaluating cross-cultural knowledge insertion in MLLMs, paired with the MCKI baseline method, showing current approaches fail to balance adaptation and preservation.