REVIEW 4 cited by
Policy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Policy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Content moderation plays a critical role in shaping safe and inclusive online environments, balancing platform standards, user expectations, and regulatory frameworks. Traditionally, this process involves operationalising policies into guidelines, which are then used by downstream human moderators for enforcement, or to further annotate datasets for training machine learning moderation models. However, recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) are transforming this landscape. These models can now interpret policies directly as textual inputs, eliminating the need for extensive data curation. This approach offers unprecedented flexibility, as moderation can be dynamically adjusted through natural language interactions. This paradigm shift raises important questions about how policies are operationalised and the implications for content moderation practices. In this paper, we formalise the emerging policy-as-prompt framework and identify five key challenges across four domains: Technical Implementation (1. translating policy to prompts, 2. sensitivity to prompt structure and formatting), Sociotechnical (3. the risk of technological determinism in policy formation), Organisational (4. evolving roles between policy and machine learning teams), and Governance (5. model governance and accountability). Through analysing these challenges across technical, sociotechnical, organisational, and governance dimensions, we discuss potential mitigation approaches. This research provides actionable insights for practitioners and lays the groundwork for future exploration of scalable and adaptive content moderation systems in digital ecosystems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
It is not enough to give your moderation rules to ChatGPT: Policy-as-Prompt Moderation and Its Potential Impacts on Community Governance
Policy-as-prompt LLM moderation has technical and governance limits that make writing prompts alone insufficient for meaningful community governance.
-
Operational Evidence Gaps for LLMs in Fraud Detection and Trust-and-Safety Workflows
A survey of 49 LLM fraud and trust-and-safety papers finds that fraud work reports almost no per-decision latency, cost, or calibration evidence, while moderation work reports more.
-
AI at the Front Lines of Platform Governance: Using LLMs to Support Illegal Content Reporting under the Digital Services Act
EvalAI providing pro/con arguments improves provision-level accuracy and reduces misclassification distance in DSA illegal content reporting under AI error conditions versus conventional XAI.
-
It is not enough to give your moderation rules to ChatGPT: Policy-as-Prompt Moderation and Its Potential Impacts on Community Governance
Writing a moderation policy as an LLM prompt cannot by itself ensure meaningful community governance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.