Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03688 v1 pith:UHN3GJCZ submitted 2024-02-06 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords learningprivacycyclefederatedlifemachinemodelsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) is a federated learning paradigm where multiple participants, who share the same set of samples but hold different features, jointly train machine learning models. Although VFL enables collaborative machine learning without sharing raw data, it is still susceptible to various privacy threats. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art in privacy attacks and defenses in VFL. We provide taxonomies for both attacks and defenses, based on their characterizations, and discuss open challenges and future research directions. Specifically, our discussion is structured around the model's life cycle, by delving into the privacy threats encountered during different stages of machine learning and their corresponding countermeasures. This survey not only serves as a resource for the research community but also offers clear guidance and actionable insights for practitioners to safeguard data privacy throughout the model's life cycle.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Membership Inference Attacks as Privacy Tools: Reliability, Disparity and Ensemble

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MIAs expose different members depending on attack method and random seed; the paper quantifies this with coverage/stability and shows ensembling attacks yields stronger, more reliable privacy checks.

  2. Secure Visual Data Processing via Federated Learning

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A federated learning system using YOLOv8 object detection and Gaussian blur anonymization is evaluated on Open Images, showing accuracy losses versus centralized training.

Pith tools