Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Parametrizing gravitational-wave polarizations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.03372 v2 pith:UKFFK7KM submitted 2022-08-05 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Parametrizing gravitational-wave polarizations

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords parametrizationssignalthemanalysesapplicationscoordinatediscussexamine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We review the formalism underlying the modeling of gravitational wave (GW) polarizations, and the coordinate frames used to define them. In the process, we clarify the notion of "polarization angle" and identify three conceptually distinct definitions. We describe how those are related and how they arise in the practice of GW data analysis, explaining in detail the relevant conventions that have become the LIGO-Virgo standard. Furthermore, we show that any GW signal can be expressed as a superposition of elliptical (i.e., fully-polarized) states, and examine the properties and possible parametrizations of such elementary states. We discuss a variety of common parametrizations for fully-polarized modes, and compute Jacobians for the coordinate transformations relating them. This allows us to examine the suitability of each parametrization for different applications, including unmodeled or semimodeled signal reconstructions. We point out that analyses parametrized directly in terms of the plus and cross mode amplitudes will tend to implicitly favor high signal power, and to prefer linearly-polarized waves along a predefined direction; this makes them suboptimal for targeting face-on or face-off sources, which will tend to be circularly polarized. We discuss alternative parametrizations, with applications extending to continuous waves, ringdown studies, and unmodeled analyses like BayesWave. Code and additional material are made available in https://github.com/maxisi/gwpols.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Polarization Analysis of Ringdown Signals

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Constrained polarization model for Kerr ringdown modes enables inclination inference from two-detector data for non-precessing mergers but introduces biases when applied to precessing systems.

  2. GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.

  3. Gravitational Wave Birefringence from Fuzzy Dark Matter

    gr-qc 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fuzzy dark matter induces frequency-dependent amplitude birefringence in gravitational waves with periodic time modulation set by the scalar mass, but no velocity birefringence.