pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.13394 · v3 · submitted 2024-06-19 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

Gravitational Wave Birefringence from Fuzzy Dark Matter

Da Huang , Ze-Xuan Xiong , Lei-Jian Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords gravitational wave birefringencefuzzy dark matterChern-Simons gravityamplitude birefringenceparity violationdark matter halodispersion relation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling fuzzy dark matter to the Chern-Simons term produces frequency-dependent amplitude birefringence in gravitational waves with periodic time modulation set by the scalar mass.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines gravitational wave propagation when a fuzzy dark matter scalar is coupled to the gravitational Chern-Simons term in a realistic oscillating galactic-scale background. Both circular polarization modes travel in straight lines at the speed of light with no velocity birefringence. The imaginary part of the dispersion relation instead produces amplitude birefringence that amplifies one polarization and suppresses the other. Because the effect is local, the strength depends only on gravitational wave frequency and shows no dependence on distance traveled. The birefringence strength also varies periodically in time with a period fixed by the fuzzy dark matter scalar mass, and galactic contributions dominate over any extra-galactic ones.

Core claim

Gravitational waves of both circularly polarized modes propagate in the straight line with the speed of light and do not show any velocity birefringence. However, when considering the imaginary part of the dispersion relation, gravitational waves exhibit amplitude birefringence in which one circular polarization is enhanced while the other is suppressed. Due to its local nature, the fuzzy dark matter-induced amplitude birefringence factor only depends on the gravitational wave frequency without any reliance on the gravitational wave propagating distance. More importantly, the birefringence shows a periodic time modulation with the period directly reflecting the fuzzy dark matter scalar mass.

What carries the argument

Coupling of the fuzzy dark matter scalar to the gravitational Chern-Simons term evaluated over a general nontrivial oscillating scalar profile at galactic scales.

If this is right

  • Both circular modes travel at light speed with no velocity difference between them.
  • The amplitude birefringence strength is set solely by wave frequency and is independent of distance.
  • The amplitude effect modulates periodically in time with a period fixed by the fuzzy dark matter scalar mass.
  • Extra-galactic fuzzy dark matter contributions remain subdominant because they are suppressed by the lower cosmological dark matter density.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modulation period offers a direct route to infer the fuzzy dark matter scalar mass from observed gravitational wave signals.
  • Because the effect is local, gravitational waves from sources behind the Milky Way halo could show the signature even if the sources themselves lie at cosmological distances.
  • The distance independence provides a clean way to separate this mechanism from other proposed sources of gravitational wave birefringence that accumulate with propagation length.

Load-bearing premise

The fuzzy dark matter scalar is coupled to the gravitational Chern-Simons term and forms a highly oscillating granular structure at galactic scales that produces a general nontrivial scalar profile for the propagation calculation.

What would settle it

Detection of time-periodic differences in amplitude between the two circular polarizations of a gravitational wave signal, with the period matching an expected fuzzy dark matter mass and with no dependence on source distance or velocity splitting.

read the original abstract

Gravitational wave (GW) birefringence is a remarkable phenomenon that can be used to test the parity violation in gravity. By coupling the fuzzy dark matter (FDM) scalar to the gravitational Chern-Simons term, we explore the GW birefringence effects in the FDM background. In particular, in light of the highly oscillating granular FDM structure at the galactic scale, we are led to investigating the GW propagation in the Chern-Simons gravity over the general nontrivial scalar profile, which is a natural extension of previous studies on the homogeneous and isotropic configurations. As a result, it is found that GWs of both circularly polarized modes propagate in the straight line with the speed of light, and does not show any velocity birefringence. However, when considering the imaginary part of the dispersion relation, GWs exhibit the amplitude birefringence in which one circular polarization is enhanced while the other suppressed. Due to its local nature, the FDM-induced amplitude birefringence factor only depends on the GW frequency without any reliance on the GW propagating distance, which can be used to distinguish this signal from other birefringece mechanisms. More importantly, the birefringence shows a periodic time modulation with the period directly reflecting the FDM scalar mass, which is another smoking gun for testing this model. Finally, we also study the extra-galactic FDM contribution to the GW birefringence, which is shown to be suppressed by the cosmological DM density and thus subdominant compared with the galactic counterpart.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper explores GW birefringence from fuzzy dark matter (FDM) by coupling the FDM scalar to the gravitational Chern-Simons term. It considers propagation through the highly oscillating granular FDM structure at galactic scales. The central results are that both circular polarizations propagate at the speed of light with no velocity birefringence, but the imaginary part of the dispersion relation produces amplitude birefringence (one mode enhanced, one suppressed). This effect is claimed to be strictly local—depending only on GW frequency, independent of propagation distance—and to exhibit periodic time modulation set by the FDM scalar mass. The extra-galactic contribution is stated to be subdominant.

Significance. If the locality claim and the explicit derivation for the inhomogeneous granular profile hold, the work supplies a new, observationally distinguishable signature of parity violation tied to FDM: frequency-only dependence plus time-periodic modulation directly reflecting the FDM mass. This would be useful for near-term GW detectors and could be falsified by the absence of such modulation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding derivation section): The claim that the amplitude birefringence factor 'only depends on the GW frequency without any reliance on the GW propagating distance' due to its 'local nature' is load-bearing for the paper's distinction from other birefringence mechanisms. For an extended, nontrivial scalar profile (the granular FDM structure), the contribution from Im(ω(k)) or Im(k(ω)) generically accumulates along the path via the WKB or eikonal approximation. The manuscript must show explicitly why the net integrated effect remains strictly local and non-accumulating while still producing a nonzero, periodically modulated birefringence.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'GWs of both circularly polarized modes propagate in the straight line with the speed of light, and does not show any velocity birefringence' contains a subject-verb agreement error ('does' should be 'do').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this key point about the locality of the amplitude birefringence. We address the comment in detail below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding derivation section): The claim that the amplitude birefringence factor 'only depends on the GW frequency without any reliance on the GW propagating distance' due to its 'local nature' is load-bearing for the paper's distinction from other birefringence mechanisms. For an extended, nontrivial scalar profile (the granular FDM structure), the contribution from Im(ω(k)) or Im(k(ω)) generically accumulates along the path via the WKB or eikonal approximation. The manuscript must show explicitly why the net integrated effect remains strictly local and non-accumulating while still producing a nonzero, periodically modulated birefringence.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required for the non-accumulation claim in the presence of the granular, oscillating FDM profile. In the derivation, the scalar field varies on scales much shorter than the GW wavelength, allowing a local WKB treatment at each point. The imaginary contribution to the dispersion relation arises from the Chern-Simons coupling and produces an amplitude factor whose phase is locked to the rapid oscillation of the FDM field (period 2π/m). When integrating the amplitude modification along the line of sight, the rapid oscillations cause the contributions from successive granules to interfere such that the net factor depends only on the instantaneous phase of the scalar at the observer's location and on the GW frequency, rather than on the total propagation distance. This yields the claimed frequency-only dependence and the periodic time modulation. We will revise the manuscript to include a dedicated subsection that performs this path integration explicitly (including the averaging over the granular oscillations) and demonstrates the reduction to a strictly local result. The revision will also clarify the distinction from standard accumulating birefringence mechanisms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no load-bearing reductions to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper derives no velocity birefringence and frequency-dependent amplitude birefringence directly from the imaginary part of the dispersion relation for GW propagation in Chern-Simons gravity over a general nontrivial FDM scalar profile. The locality claim (independence from propagation distance) and the periodic time modulation (tied to FDM mass) follow from the model equations without any quoted step reducing a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work. No self-definitional loops or renaming of known results appear in the provided derivation outline. The result remains independent of external benchmarks and is presented as a direct consequence of the setup.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of fuzzy dark matter with a granular galactic-scale profile and on the ad-hoc coupling of its scalar to the Chern-Simons term; no new particles or forces beyond these modeling choices are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • FDM scalar mass
    Sets the period of the time modulation; treated as a free model parameter whose value would be read off from observations.
  • coupling constant to Chern-Simons term
    Introduced to generate the birefringence; its value controls the strength of the amplitude effect.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Fuzzy dark matter exists and forms highly oscillating granular structures at galactic scales.
    Invoked to justify studying propagation over a general nontrivial scalar profile rather than homogeneous backgrounds.
  • ad hoc to paper The fuzzy dark matter scalar couples to the gravitational Chern-Simons term.
    The coupling is added specifically to produce the birefringence effect under study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5809 in / 1494 out tokens · 23540 ms · 2026-05-23T23:53:42.652395+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    by including the imaginary part, which might lead to the GW amplitude birefringence. Fo llowing the general rules of eikonal approximation, we obtain dxi dt = − ∂D ± /∂k i ∂D ± /∂ω ≈ { 1 ± i(α/κ )[2∂t∂zφ + (∂2 t φ + ∂2 z φ)]}δi z , dki dt = ∂D ± /∂x i ∂D ± /∂ω ≈ ∓ i(αω/ 2κ) [ 2∂t∂z∂iφ + ∂2 t ∂iφ + ∂2 z ∂iφ ] , dω dt = − ∂D ± /∂t ∂D ± /∂ω ≈ ± i(αω/ 2κ) [ 2...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rept. 692, 1 (2017) , arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Cosmological Signature of New Parity-Violating Interactions

    A. Lue, L.-M. Wang, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1506 (1999) , arXiv:astro-ph/9812088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Chern-Simons Modification of General Relativity

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 104012 (2003) , arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Phys. Rept. 480, 1 (2009) , arXiv:0907.2562 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Conroy and T

    A. Conroy and T. Koivisto, JCAP 12, 016 (2019) , arXiv:1908.04313 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Beyond Lovelock gravity: Higher derivative metric theories

    M. Crisostomi, K. Noui, C. Charmousis, and D. Langlois, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044034 (2018) , arXiv:1710.04531 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Parity-violating gravity and GW170817

    A. Nishizawa and T. Kobayashi, Phys. Rev. D 98, 124018 (2018) , arXiv:1809.00815 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Hojman, C

    R. Hojman, C. Mukku, and W. A. Sayed, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1915 (1980)

    work page 1915

  10. [10]

    Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point

    P. Horava, Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009) , arXiv:0901.3775 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Chiral Primordial Gravitational Waves from a Lifshitz Point

    T. Takahashi and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 231301 (2009) , arXiv:0904.0554 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    T. Zhu, W. Zhao, Y. Huang, A. Wang, and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 88, 063508 (2013) , arXiv:1305.0600 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Lorentz violation with an antisymmetric tensor

    B. Altschul, Q. G. Bailey, and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D 81, 065028 (2010) , arXiv:0912.4852 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Takahashi, M

    K. Takahashi, M. Minamitsuji, and H. Motohashi, PTEP 2023, 013E01 (2023) , arXiv:2209.02176 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Sulantay, M

    F. Sulantay, M. Lagos, and M. Ba˜ nados, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104025 (2023) , arXiv:2211.08925 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Bombacigno, F

    F. Bombacigno, F. Moretti, S. Boudet, and G. J. Olmo, JCAP 02, 009 (2023) , arXiv:2210.07673 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Boudet, F

    S. Boudet, F. Bombacigno, F. Moretti, and G. J. Olmo, JCAP 01, 026 (2023) , arXiv:2209.14394 [gr-qc] . 11

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Gauss-Bonnet Chern-Simons gravitational wave leptogenesis

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 789, 145 (2019) , arXiv:1702.07689 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and M. Mewes, Phys. Lett. B 757, 510 (2016) , arXiv:1602.04782 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Kanno, J

    S. Kanno, J. Soda, and A. Taniguchi, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083525 (2023) , arXiv:2304.03944 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016) , arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL), Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13 (2017) , arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019) , arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021) , arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023) , arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Birefringent Gravitational Waves and the Consistency Check of Inflation

    S. Alexander and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 71, 063526 (2005) , arXiv:hep-th/0410230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    A gravitational-wave probe of effective quantum gravity

    S. Alexander, L. S. Finn, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 78, 066005 (2008) , arXiv:0712.2542 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Testing gravitational parity violation with coincident gravitational waves and short gamma-ray bursts

    N. Yunes, R. O’Shaughnessy, B. J. Owen, and S. Alexander , Phys. Rev. D 82, 064017 (2010) , arXiv:1005.3310 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    S. H. Alexander and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 97, 064033 (2018) , arXiv:1712.01853 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, W. Hu, M. Lagos, and M.-X. Lin, JCAP 11, 048 (2021) , arXiv:2108.10872 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Circular Polarization of Primordial Gravitational Waves in String-inspired Inflationary Cosmology

    M. Satoh, S. Kanno, and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. D 77, 023526 (2008) , arXiv:0706.3585 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    Probing circular polarization in stochastic gravitational wave background with pulsar timing arrays

    R. Kato and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. D 93, 062003 (2016) , arXiv:1512.09139 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Exploring the string axiverse and parity violation in gravity with gravitational waves

    D. Yoshida and J. Soda, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1850096 (2018) , arXiv:1708.09592 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    S. Jung, T. Kim, J. Soda, and Y. Urakawa, Phys. Rev. D 102, 055013 (2020) , arXiv:2003.02853 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    C.-S. Chu, J. Soda, and D. Yoshida, Universe 6, 89 (2020) , arXiv:2002.04859 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    M. Li, H. Rao, and D. Zhao, JCAP 11, 023 (2020) , arXiv:2007.08038 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Okounkova, W

    M. Okounkova, W. M. Farr, M. Isi, and L. C. Stein, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044067 (2022) , 12 arXiv:2101.11153 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and A. A. Popo v, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084009 (2019) , arXiv:1909.01324 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Daniel, L

    T. Daniel, L. Jenks, and S. Alexander, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124012 (2024) , arXiv:2403.09373 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Manton and S

    T. Manton and S. Alexander, (2024), arXiv:2401.14452 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Lagos, L

    M. Lagos, L. Jenks, M. Isi, K. Hotokezaka, B. D. Metzger, E. Burns, W. M. Farr, S. Perkins, K. W. K. Wong, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124003 (2024) , arXiv:2402.05316 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    T. C. K. Ng, M. Isi, K. W. K. Wong, and W. M. Farr, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084068 (2023) , arXiv:2305.05844 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    W. Zhao, T. Zhu, J. Qiao, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 024002 (2020) , arXiv:1909.10887 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Y.-F. Wang, R. Niu, T. Zhu, and W. Zhao, Astrophys. J. 908, 58 (2021) , arXiv:2002.05668 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Jenks, L

    L. Jenks, L. Choi, M. Lagos, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044023 (2023) , arXiv:2305.10478 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Callister, L

    T. Callister, L. Jenks, D. Holz, and N. Yunes, (2023), arXiv:2312.12532 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018) , arXiv:1605.04909 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1158 (2000) , arXiv:astro-ph/0003365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  49. [49]

    D. J. E. Marsh and P. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 82, 103528 (2010) , arXiv:1009.3501 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043541 (2017) , arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Z. G. Berezhiani, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 55, 1063 (1992)

    work page 1992

  52. [52]

    J. C. Niemeyer, (2019), 10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103787 , arXiv:1912.07064 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103787 2019

  53. [53]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29, 7 (2021) , arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Ann

    L. Hui, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 247 (2021) , arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broadhurst, Nature Phys. 10, 496 (2014) , arXiv:1406.6586 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter, $\psi$DM, from 3D Simulations

    H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chiu eh, T. Broadhurst, and W. Y. P. 13 Hwang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261302 (2014) , arXiv:1407.7762 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    P. Mocz, M. Vogelsberger, V. H. Robles, J. Zavala, M. Boy lan-Kolchin, A. Fialkov, and L. Hernquist, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, 4559 (2017) , arXiv:1705.05845 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Cosmological particle-in-cell simulations with ultralight axion dark matter

    J. Veltmaat and J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123523 (2016) , arXiv:1608.00802 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    AX-GADGET: a new code for cosmological simulations of Fuzzy Dark Matter and Axion models

    M. Nori and M. Baldi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478, 3935 (2018) , arXiv:1801.08144 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    M. Y. Khlopov, A. S. Sakharov, and D. D. Sokoloff, in 2nd International Workshop on Birth of the Universe and Fundamental Physics (1998) arXiv:hep-ph/9812286

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  61. [61]

    Hwang and H

    J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh, JCAP 03, 001 (2022) , arXiv:2109.05436 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Qiu and T

    Y.-C. Qiu and T. T. Yanagida, (2022), arXiv:2211.15967 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Alvarez-Gaume and E

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 234, 269 (1984)

    work page 1984

  64. [64]

    Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY (1988)

    work page 1988

  66. [66]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007 )

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    S. H.-S. Alexander, M. E. Peskin, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabba ri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 081301 (2006) , arXiv:hep-th/0403069

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    S. H. S. Alexander and S. J. Gates, Jr., JCAP 06, 018 (2006) , arXiv:hep-th/0409014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  69. [69]

    Weinberg, Physical Review 126, 1899 (1962)

    S. Weinberg, Physical Review 126, 1899 (1962)

    work page 1962

  70. [70]

    Tsutsui and A

    T. Tsutsui and A. Nishizawa, Phys. Rev. D 106, L081301 (2022) , arXiv:2207.00667 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Lambiase, L

    G. Lambiase, L. Mastrototaro, and L. Visinelli, JCAP 01, 011 (2023) , arXiv:2207.08067 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Isi, Class

    M. Isi, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 203001 (2023) , arXiv:2208.03372 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    D. Blas, A. Caputo, M. M. Ivanov, and L. Sberna, Phys. Dark Univ. 27, 100428 (2020) , arXiv:1910.06128 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    V. H. Robles, J. S. Bullock, and M. Boylan-Kolchin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 483, 289 (2019) , arXiv:1807.06018 [astro-ph.CO] . 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997) , arXiv:astro-ph/9611107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  76. [76]

    Pulsar timing signal from ultralight scalar dark matter

    A. Khmelnitsky and V. Rubakov, JCAP 02, 019 (2014) , arXiv:1309.5888 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  77. [77]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) , [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3258 (1997) , arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  79. [79]

    C. S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller, and B. A. Stef anek, JHEP 01, 053 (2019) , arXiv:1811.01950 [hep-ph] . 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019