REVIEW
Cosmological Signature of New Parity-Violating Interactions
Astrophysics · Submitted 4 Dec 1998 · 16 references
Pith's verdict: The parity diagnostic is clean and correct, and the f(Φ)R R̃ mechanism is genuinely new; the weak point is that the reach numbers are order-of-magnitude estimates presented without error bars.
T0 · AI review
Why Pith says this
Highlight any text to comment on it.
Referee report
The paper
The paper claims
The paper argues that a map of the cosmic microwave background's temperature and polarization can reveal parity violation outside the weak interaction, because certain temperature–polarization cross-correlations must vanish exactly if the早期
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing device is the gradient/curl (usually called E/B) decomposition of the linear-polarization tensor field on the sky. Because the two families of tensor spherical harmonics have opposite parity, the ordinary temperature–curl and gradient–curl cross-spectra are parity-odd observables: they are the only two-point functions in the temperature/polarization map that a parity-symmetric universe cannot produce. The paper then supplies the physics that would fill them in, a scalar coupled to $F tilde F$ (which mixes the gradient and curl components by a uniform rotation and so converts an existing $C^{TG}_{l}$ into $C^{TC}_{l}$) and a scalar coupled to $R tilde R$ (which gives the two circular polarization states of a gravitational wave different dispersion relations and so imprints a handedness on the tensor background).
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is a selection rule plus two worked realizations of it. Expand the temperature map in spherical harmonics and the Stokes $Q$ and $U$ maps in tensor spherical harmonics split into a gradient (curl-free) part $G$ and a curl part $C$; the temperature and gradient harmonics carry parity $(-1)^{l}$ while the curl harmonics carry $(-1)^{l+1}$, so $C^{TC}_{l}$ and $C^{GC}_{l}$ must be zero for any parity-invariant cosmology. A nonzero $C^{TC}_{l}$ therefore means the Universe has a preferred handedness — a charge-blind, frequency-independent signature distinct from the parity violation of the weak interaction, which is invisible unless particles are distinguished from antiparticles. The paper then shows two ways to generate it: an effective term $g(chi) F_{mu nu} tilde F^{mu nu}$ with a time-varying scalar gives a rotation $Delta alpha$ of the polarization plane and induces $C^{TC}_{l} = C^{TG}_{l} sin(2 Delta alpha)$ with the same shape in $l$ as the gradient cross-spectrum; and a term $f(Phi) R_{lambda sigma mu nu} tilde R^{sigma mu nu lambda}$ with a rolling inflaton amplifies right-handed gravitational waves and attenuates left-handed ones, so that $C^{TC}_{l} = epsilon C^{TC,R}_{l}$ for a left–right asymmetry parameter $epsilon$. The paper's own sensitivity estimate is that $epsilon$ down to about $0.08$, corresponding to new physics at $mu sim 4 times 10^{-5} M_{P}$, and rotation angles below about $0.01^{circ}$, would be reachable by a future high-sensitivity polarization experiment, while MAP and Planck would fall short.
Load-bearing premise
The estimate of how large the inflationary handedness effect is assumes that right- and left-handed gravitational waves start out with equal amplitude and that the entire asymmetry is accumulated while their wavelengths are shorter than the horizon, so a different initial split or a different freeze-out accounting would shift the mapping from the measured asymmetry to the mass scale of the new physics.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A measured nonzero $C^{TC}_{l}$ or $C^{GC}_{l}$ would be direct evidence for parity violation outside the weak sector, since both vanish identically under parity-symmetric gravity and inflation.
- Because the rotation-induced signal is frequency independent, it can be separated from Faraday rotation by intervening magnetic fields, which is chromatic and also anisotropic in its $l$-dependence.
- The cosmic microwave background probes the rolling of a quintessence-like scalar out to redshift $z simeq 1100$, reaching earlier epochs than the radio-galaxy and quasar polarization constraints that only cover redshifts of a few.
- A null result at the cosmic-variance limit converts directly into an upper bound on the left–right asymmetry $epsilon$ and hence, through the paper's estimate, a lower bound on the mass scale $mu$ of the parity-violating physics.
- The gradient–curl cross-spectrum $C^{GC}_{l}$ carries additional independent information that the paper does not fold into its sensitivity numbers, so the quoted reach is conservative.
Reading between the lines
- The same parity-odd cross-spectra are a cheap add-on to any polarization analysis: they require no new instrument, only that the standard temperature and polarization spectra not be computed under an assumed parity symmetry and then discarded.
- If a future experiment finds $C^{TC}_{l}$ nonzero but with an $l$-dependence that does not match the gradient cross-spectrum's shape, that would point to a spatially varying rotation — a birefringence field rather than a uniform angle — which is a distinguishable and physically different scenario from the one computed here.
- The two mechanisms predict different accompanying signatures in the curl-only polarization spectrum, so a joint fit of the parity-odd and parity-even spectra could in principle separate a birefringence interpretation from an inflationary handedness interpretation rather than merely detecting 'something'.
- The paper's separation of the two effects by epoch — one active after last scattering, one active during inflation — suggests a general bookkeeping: any parity-odd cosmic signal should be dated by when the relevant scalar was rolling, which is a constraint that the temperature–curl shape alone can supply.
Original abstract
Does Nature yield any manifestations of parity violation other than those observed in weak interactions? A map of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization will provide a new signature of P violation. We give two examples of new P violating interactions, which may have something to do with Planck-scale physics, inflation, and/or quintessence, that would give rise to such a signature. Although these effects would most likely elude detection by MAP and the Planck Surveyor, they may be detectable with a future dedicated CMB polarization experiment.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Does Nature yield any manifestations of parity violation other than those observed in weak interactions? A map of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization will provide a new signature of P violation. We give two examples of new P violating interactions, which may have something to do with Planck-scale physics, inflation, and/or quintessence, that would give rise to such a signature. Although these effects would most likely elude detection by MAP and the Planck Surveyor, they may be detectable with a future dedicated CMB polarization experiment.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Does Nature yield any manifestations of parity violation other than those observed in weak interactions? | background 0.86 | 0.03 | 0.03 | unclear 0.88 |
| s1 | A map of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization will provide a new signature of P violation. | contribution 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.63 | asserted 0.96 |
| s2 | We give two examples of new P violating interactions, which may have something to do with Planck-scale physics, inflation, and/or quintessence, that would give rise to such a signature. | contribution 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.23 | hedged possibility 0.92 |
| s3 | Although these effects would most likely elude detection by MAP and the Planck Surveyor, they may be detectable with a future dedicated CMB polarization experiment. | limitation 0.51 | 0.11 | 0.23 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
Figures
Figures reproduced from arXiv:astro-ph/9812088 by the authors.
References
How later papers used it
337 later papers cite it
1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 compared its own results with it.
Compares with it 1 of 7 papers with this label
-
Said that its estimate of the detectable level was roughly consistent with the one obtained by this paper, which reported that a post-PLANCK experiment might conceivably discriminate a value as small as ε∼0.08 for r=0.7.
Probing polarization states of primordial gravitational waves with CMB anisotropies (2007) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
How the literature uses it
306 arXiv papers cite this in 436 sentences
Papers citing it · 254 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 7 papers
-
Most predictions in this case, however, will be similar to that from the slow-rolling ALP scenario [ref] .
Kilobyte Cosmic Birefringence from ALP Domain Walls · Discussion and conclusions · 0.88
-
In this latter respect, as remarked in [ref] , the StRVM inflationary phenomenology is similar to the one proposed in [ref] on inflationary birefringence induced by the gCS terms.
Quantum-Ordering Ambiguities in Weak Chern-Simons 4D Gravity and Metastability of the Condensate-Induced Inflation · Quantum-Ordering Ambiguities and Metastability of the gCS-Condensate-Induced Inflation · 0.98
-
Note that this estimate is roughly consistent with the one obtained by Ref. [ref] , in which the authors reported that post-PLANCK experiment might conceivably be able to discriminate a value as small as $ε∼0.08$ for the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r=0.7$, comparable to our estimate of the detectable level, $0.07$.
Probing polarization states of primordial gravitational waves with CMB anisotropies · Future prospects · 1.00
Cites it as support 3 papers
-
This is particularly motivated by a recently reported detection of cosmic birefringence in Planck legacy data [ref] , and by the original description of this phenomenon in terms of pseudoscalar fields in cosmology [ref] .
Constraints on Global Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Gravity from Cosmic Birefringence Measurements · Introduction · 0.97
-
As already pointed out [ref] , this redshift dependence induces a multipole dependence of the cosmological birefringence effect in the CMB power spectra which goes beyond the widely used approximation for which the rotation angle is assumed constant in redshift [ref] .
Redshift evolution of cosmic birefringence in CMB anisotropies · Introduction · 0.96
-
Nevertheless, the Chern-Simons gravity [ref] and the recently studied ghostfree quadratic gravity [ref] show the possibility of the existence of ghostfree high curvature gravity, which also indicates the existence of ghostfree scalar-tensor theories with derivatives beyond the second order.
Higher derivative scalar-tensor theory and spatially covariant gravity: the correspondence · Introduction · 0.98
Cites it as background 147 papers
-
In this section, we briefly review a mechanism to generate a circularly polarized GWB by the gravitational Chern-Simons (gCS) term [ref] .
Probing polarization states of primordial gravitational waves with CMB anisotropies · Polarized gravitational waves from gravitational Chern-Simons term · 0.96
-
The uniform and frequency-independent rotation by an angle $β$ mixes the $E$ and $B$ modes, resulting in $C_ℓ^TB,o=sin(2β)C_ℓ^TE$ [ref] and $C_ℓ^EB,o=1/2 sin(4β)(C_ℓ^EE-C_ℓ^BB)$ [ref] .
Cosmic Birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6 · Introduction · 0.80
-
In that scenario, primordial lepton asymmetry is produced through the gravitational anomaly in the lepton current [ref] during inflation through the generation of chiral gravitational waves induced by the gravitational Chern-Simons (gCS) coupling [ref] .
Gravitational leptogenesis with kination and gravitational reheating · Introduction · 0.88
Discussion
Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.