pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1705.11098 · v3 · submitted 2017-05-31 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 17:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords modified gravityF(R) gravityinflationbouncing cosmologydark energylate-time accelerationunified cosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modified gravity theories provide workable models for inflation, cosmic bounces, and late-time acceleration using only changes to the gravitational action.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the basic formalisms of F(R), F(G), and F(T) gravity along with several newer variants and shows how each can generate an early inflationary phase that fits current data. It also explains how the same frameworks produce nonsingular bouncing solutions that replace the big-bang singularity and later drive the observed accelerated expansion. The central goal is to collect these techniques into one practical collection so that a single modified-gravity function can potentially handle the whole history of the universe.

Core claim

By replacing the Einstein-Hilbert term with a general function of the Ricci scalar, the Gauss-Bonnet invariant, or the torsion scalar, the resulting field equations acquire extra degrees of freedom that can source inflation at early times, avoid singularities via bounces, and produce the observed dark-energy behavior at late times, all without introducing new fundamental fields.

What carries the argument

F(R) gravity and its generalizations, in which the Ricci scalar R in the action is replaced by an arbitrary differentiable function F(R), thereby modifying the gravitational dynamics while preserving diffeomorphism invariance.

If this is right

  • Inflationary predictions from these models can be made compatible with the latest Planck constraints on the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio.
  • Bouncing solutions generated by the modified equations remove the initial singularity and connect smoothly to standard expansion.
  • A single modified-gravity function can link the inflationary era directly to the present acceleration without an intermediate dark-energy field.
  • Astrophysical objects such as neutron stars and black holes acquire modified interior solutions whose properties differ from general relativity.
  • The dark-energy phase can be described by the same higher-curvature terms that drive early inflation, yielding testable evolution of the Hubble parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If these models succeed, the need for separate inflaton and dark-energy scalar fields could be eliminated in favor of purely gravitational corrections.
  • The same action modifications might eventually be matched to effective descriptions that emerge from quantum gravity at different curvature scales.
  • Observational programs that tightly constrain the time evolution of the equation of state could rule out or confirm entire classes of these functions.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functions in these modified actions can always be tuned so that the models stay stable and match every existing measurement once higher-order corrections are included.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the dark-energy equation-of-state parameter or of the tensor-to-scalar ratio that lies outside the range any single F(R) or F(T) function can reproduce.

read the original abstract

We systematically review some standard issues and also the latest developments of modified gravity in cosmology, emphasizing on inflation, bouncing cosmology and late-time acceleration era. Particularly, we present the formalism of standard modified gravity theory representatives, like $F(R)$, $F(\mathcal{G})$ and $F(T)$ gravity theories, but also several alternative theoretical proposals which appeared in the literature during the last decade. We emphasize on the formalism developed for these theories and we explain how these theories can be considered as viable descriptions for our Universe. Using these theories, we present how a viable inflationary era can be produced in the context of these theories, with the viability being justified if compatibility with the latest observational data is achieved. Also we demonstrate how bouncing cosmologies can actually be described by these theories. Moreover, we systematically discuss several qualitative features of the dark energy era by using the modified gravity formalism, and also we critically discuss how a unified description of inflation with dark energy era can be described by solely using the modified gravity framework. Finally, we also discuss some astrophysical solutions in the context of modified gravity, and several qualitative features of these solutions. The aim of this review is to gather the different modified gravity techniques and form a virtual modified gravity "toolbox", which will contain all the necessary information on inflation, dark energy and bouncing cosmologies in the context of the various forms of modified gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review systematically presents the formalisms of modified gravity theories including F(R), F(G), F(T) and several alternative proposals from the last decade. It explains their application to producing viable inflationary eras (justified by compatibility with latest observational data), describing bouncing cosmologies, qualitative features of the dark energy era, unified inflation-dark energy descriptions using only modified gravity, and astrophysical solutions, with the overall aim of assembling these techniques into a virtual 'toolbox' for cosmology.

Significance. As a compilation of existing formalisms and cited results on observational viability, the paper serves as a convenient reference consolidating approaches to inflation, bounces, and late-time acceleration in modified gravity. Its significance lies in providing an organized overview that could aid navigation of the literature, though this is limited by reliance on prior works without new verification of stability issues.

major comments (2)
  1. [Inflation discussion (abstract and F(R) formalism sections)] Abstract and sections on inflationary viability: the claim that viable inflationary eras are produced with compatibility to observational data rests on cited literature but omits discussion of whether these regimes remain stable once higher-order curvature invariants (e.g., R^3 or R□R terms) are restored, which can destabilize F(R) slow-roll branches.
  2. [Bouncing cosmologies sections] Sections on bouncing cosmologies: the demonstration that bouncing solutions can be described by these theories does not include checks for ghost instabilities or consistency under quantum corrections, leaving the viability assertion dependent on unexamined assumptions from the cited works.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Formalism sections] Notation for auxiliary functions in the F(G) and F(T) formalisms could be standardized across sections for improved readability.
  2. A brief table summarizing the key viability criteria (slow-roll parameters, stability conditions) across theories would help readers quickly compare the reviewed models.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our review and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and propose targeted revisions to improve clarity on the scope and limitations of the compiled results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Inflation discussion (abstract and F(R) formalism sections)] Abstract and sections on inflationary viability: the claim that viable inflationary eras are produced with compatibility to observational data rests on cited literature but omits discussion of whether these regimes remain stable once higher-order curvature invariants (e.g., R^3 or R□R terms) are restored, which can destabilize F(R) slow-roll branches.

    Authors: We agree that the review relies on cited literature for viability claims without an explicit stability analysis under restored higher-order terms. As the manuscript is a compilation of existing formalisms rather than new research, we will add a concise paragraph in the F(R) inflation section (and a corresponding note in the abstract discussion) highlighting that certain extensions can introduce instabilities and referencing key works that derive stability conditions for viable slow-roll branches. This addition will clarify the assumptions without altering the review's scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Bouncing cosmologies sections] Sections on bouncing cosmologies: the demonstration that bouncing solutions can be described by these theories does not include checks for ghost instabilities or consistency under quantum corrections, leaving the viability assertion dependent on unexamined assumptions from the cited works.

    Authors: The bouncing cosmologies section reviews formalisms and solutions drawn directly from the literature. We acknowledge the absence of explicit checks for ghost instabilities and quantum corrections within the review itself. We will insert a short subsection or paragraph summarizing the relevant stability considerations from the cited papers, including conditions under which ghost modes are avoided and the status of quantum corrections, to make the limitations transparent to readers. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review compiles external formalisms; no self-referential derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a review paper that presents standard formalisms for F(R), F(G), F(T) and alternative modified gravity models drawn from the existing literature. It explains how these can produce inflationary eras, bouncing cosmologies and late-time acceleration by referencing compatibility with observational data in cited works. No new derivations, parameter fits or predictions are performed within the paper that reduce by construction to its own inputs. Viability statements are justified by external citations rather than internal self-citation chains or redefinitions. The paper functions as a toolbox of known techniques and remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; the authors introduce no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities of their own. All content is drawn from the cited literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 978 out tokens · 38406 ms · 2026-05-15T17:25:53.478850+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DAlembert.Inevitability bilinear_family_forced echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Using these theories, we present how a viable inflationary era can be produced in the context of these theories, with the viability being justified if compatibility with the latest observational data is achieved. Also we demonstrate how bouncing cosmologies can actually be described by these theories.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.HierarchyEmergence hierarchy_emergence_forces_phi unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We systematically review some standard issues and also the latest developments of modified gravity in cosmology, emphasizing on inflation, bouncing cosmology and late-time acceleration era. Particularly, we present the formalism of standard modified gravity theory representatives, like F(R), F(G) and F(T) gravity theories

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational Memory from Hairy Binary Black Hole Mergers

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Gravitational memory from hairy binary black hole mergers in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity differs from GR by a few percent due to altered nonlinear dynamics, with direct scalar contributions suppressed, and including m...

  2. Probing the small-scale primordial power spectrum via relic neutrinos and acoustic reheating

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dissipation of small-scale primordial perturbations after neutrino decoupling cools relic neutrinos and reduces their abundance, enabling PTOLEMY to constrain the primordial curvature power spectrum to O(0.1) on scale...

  3. Scalar memory from compact binary coalescences

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    In Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, the change in scalar charge during binary black hole mergers generates a scalar memory contribution that modifies the total memory signal on observable timescales.

  4. Cosmologically viable non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity: explicit models, $\Lambda$CDM limit and observational constraints

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity models reproduce the standard thermal history, generate dynamical dark energy of geometric origin, and fit supernova, cosmic chronometer, and BAO data competitively with ΛCDM.

  5. Beyond $f(\phi)\mathcal{G}$: Gauss--Bonnet inflation with $\mu(\phi,X)$

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A phase-space gating function μ(φ,X) localizes Gauss-Bonnet contributions to a finite e-fold window in inflation while preserving ghost and gradient stability for scalar and tensor modes.

  6. Thermal channels of scalar and tensor waves in Jordan-frame scalar--tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scalar and tensor perturbations in Jordan-frame scalar-tensor gravity admit an exact linear-order Eckart effective-fluid description, with gravitational-wave damping governed by the scalar sector's transverse-traceles...

  7. Cosmological Dynamics of a Non-Canonical Generalised Brans-Dicke Theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A non-canonical generalized Brans-Dicke theory admits background cosmological solutions matching Lambda CDM characteristics for constant, power-law, and exponential potentials, with dynamics distinct from other scalar...

  8. Exploring Cosmic Evolution in R\'enyi Entropic Cosmology with Constraints from DESI DR2 BAO and GW Data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rényi entropic corrections to cosmology are constrained by DESI DR2 BAO and GW data to a viable quintessence-like model that approaches ΛCDM without phantom behavior and satisfies BBN bounds.

  9. Viability of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in Some Generalized Horizon Entropies

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generalized horizon entropy models satisfy BBN constraints on helium and deuterium abundances when parameters are chosen for cosmic acceleration, though lithium remains discrepant as in standard cosmology.

  10. Observational constraints on nonlocal black holes via gravitational lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nonlocal black holes remain consistent with general relativity at the 1.13-sigma level after joint lensing and quasinormal-mode constraints.

  11. Singularity softening and avoidance by the action of thermal radiation in a generalized entropic cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Hawking radiation induces a qualitative softening or complete avoidance of the Big Rip singularity in this viscous dark-fluid entropic cosmology.

  12. String-inspired Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Inflation and ACT

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MCMC analysis of sixteen ghost-free f(R,G) inflation models shows all reproduce ns ≈ 0.97 at 60 e-folds with stable μ ≈ 0.1, preference set by Hubble parametrization.

  13. Energy conditions of bouncing solutions in quadratic curvature gravity coupled with a scalar field

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bouncing solutions in quadratic curvature gravity with a scalar field satisfy null, weak, and dominant energy conditions but violate the strong one when using the scalar-field energy-momentum tensor, while all four co...

  14. Causality Violating Solutions in Curvature-Squared Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Godel and Godel-type metrics satisfy the curvature-squared field equations as causal solutions with all Weyl tensor contributions removed, while an axially symmetric metric shows Weyl-dependent modifications to energy...

  15. Scalar-Field Reconstruction of Ricci--Gauss--Bonnet Dark Energy in Ho\v{r}ava--Lifshitz Cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Scalar-field reconstruction of Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet dark energy in Hořava-Lifshitz cosmology produces an equation of state that transitions smoothly to de Sitter-like behavior at late times, with stable sound speed and ...

  16. Transiently accelerating cosmological model with Gong-Zhang parametrization in $f(T)$ teleparallel gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    In f(T) gravity with Gong-Zhang EoS parametrization, the fitted model shows transient acceleration followed by future deceleration and satisfies thermodynamic consistency.

  17. The $f(Q, T)$ gravity and affine EoS: observational aspects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    f(Q,T) gravity with linear form and affine EoS is constrained by CC, Pantheon+SH0ES and DESI BAO data, yielding a present universe age consistent with Planck within 1σ.

  18. Observational tests of \texorpdfstring{$\Lambda(t)$}{Lambda(t)} cosmology in light of DESI DR2

    physics.gen-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    MCMC constraints on two Lambda(t) models with DESI DR2, CC, and Pantheon+ data yield H0 ~72.5-73 km/s/Mpc, Omega_m0 near standard values in joint fits, and n~0.3 indicating mild deviation from LambdaCDM.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 287 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess et al. [Supernova Search Team], Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201]

  2. [2]

    S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden and M. S. Turner, Phy s. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043528 [astro-ph/0306438]

  3. [3]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559 [astro-ph/0207347]

  4. [4]

    Dark Energy and Modified Gravity

    R. Durrer and R. Maartens, Dark Energy: Observational & T heoretical Approaches, ed. P Ruiz-Lapuente (Cambridge UP, 2010), pp48 - 91 [arXiv:0811.4132 [astro-ph]]. 108

  5. [5]

    R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009) 397 [arXiv:0903.0866 [astro-ph.CO]]

  6. [6]

    Caldwell and M

    R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Nature 458 (2009) 587

  7. [7]

    M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 56 (2011) 525 [arXiv:1103.5870 [astro-ph.CO]]

  8. [8]

    Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests

    K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, As trophys. Space Sci. 342 (2012) 155 [arXiv:1205.3421 [gr-qc]]

  9. [9]

    F. S. N. Lobo, Dark Energy-Current Advances and Ideas [ar Xiv:0807.1640 [gr-qc]]

  10. [10]

    The Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy

    G. Gubitosi, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, JCAP 1302 (2013) 032 [JCAP 1302 (2013) 032] [arXiv:1210.0201 [hep-th]]

  11. [11]

    J. K. Bloomfield, E. E. Flanagan, M. Park and S. Watson, JC AP 1308 (2013) 010 [arXiv:1211.7054 [astro-ph.CO]]

  12. [12]

    Essential Building Blocks of Dark Energy

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, JCAP 1308 (2013) 025 [arXiv:1304.4840 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, Front. Phys. (Beijing ) 8 (2013) 828 [arXiv:1209.0922 [astro-ph.CO]]

  14. [14]

    A primer on problems and prospects of dark energy

    M. Sami, Curr. Sci. 97 (2009) 887 [arXiv:0904.3445 [hep-th]]

  15. [15]

    A. B. Balakin, Symmetry 8 (2016) no.7, 56 [arXiv:1606.06331 [gr-qc]]

  16. [16]

    N. N. Weinberg and M. Kamionkowski, Mon. Not. Roy. Astro n. Soc. 341 (2003) 251 [astro-ph/0210134]

  17. [17]

    Accelerating Universe: Observational Status and Theoretical Implications

    L. Perivolaropoulos, AIP Conf. Proc. 848 (2006) 698 [astro-ph/0601014]

  18. [18]

    An introduction to the dark energy problem

    A. Dobado and A. L. Maroto, Astrophys. Space Sci. 320 (2009) 167 [arXiv:0802.1873 [astro-ph]]

  19. [19]

    P. K. S. Dunsby and O. Luongo, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phy s. 13 (2016) no.03, 1630002 [arXiv:1511.06532 [gr-qc]]

  20. [20]

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant

    I. Zlatev, L. M. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Let t. 82 (1999) 896 [astro-ph/9807002]

  21. [21]

    S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 3067 [astro-ph/9806099]

  22. [22]

    L. M. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt, Astrophys. J. 508 (1998) 483 [astro-ph/9804015]

  23. [23]

    Quintessence, the Gravitational Constant, and Gravity

    T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 083508 [gr-qc/9903094]

  24. [24]

    Quintessence arising from exponential potentials

    T. Barreiro, E. J. Copeland and N. J. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 127301 [astro-ph/9910214]

  25. [25]

    Kinetically Driven Quintessence

    T. Chiba, T. Okabe and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 023511 [astro-ph/9912463]

  26. [26]

    Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Future Galaxy Cluster Surveys

    Z. Haiman, J. J. Mohr and G. P. Holder, Astrophys. J. 553 (2000) 545 [astro-ph/0002336]

  27. [27]

    Curvature Quintessence

    S. Capozziello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 (2002) 483 [gr-qc/0201033]

  28. [28]

    The Cosmological Constant Problem and Quintessence

    V. Sahni, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 3435 [astro-ph/0202076]

  29. [29]

    Curvature quintessence matched with observational data

    S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12 (2003) 1969 [astro-ph/0307018]

  30. [30]

    J. G. Hao and X. Z. Li, Phys. Lett. B 606 (2005) 7 [astro-ph/0404154]

  31. [31]

    B. A. Bassett, P. S. Corasaniti and M. Kunz, Astrophys. J . 617 (2004) L1 [astro-ph/0407364]

  32. [32]

    Constraints on linear-negative potentials in quintessence and phantom models from recent supernova data

    L. Perivolaropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063503 [astro-ph/0412308]

  33. [33]

    Coupled Quintessence in a Power-Law Case and the Cosmic Coincidence Problem

    X. Zhang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20 (2005) 2575 [astro-ph/0503072]

  34. [34]

    Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models

    G. Olivares, F. Atrio-Barandela and D. Pavon, Phys. Rev . D 71 (2005) 063523 [astro-ph/0503242]

  35. [35]

    Z. K. Guo, N. Ohta and Y. Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 023504 [astro-ph/0505253]

  36. [36]

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 141301 [astro-ph/0505494]

  37. [37]

    R. J. Scherrer and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 083515 [arXiv:0712.3450 [astro-ph]]

  38. [38]

    The Effective Theory of Quintessence: the w<-1 Side Unveiled

    P. Creminelli, G. D’Amico, J. Norena and F. Vernizzi, JC AP 0902 (2009) 018 [arXiv:0811.0827 [astro-ph]]

  39. [39]

    Quintessence without scalar fields

    S. Capozziello, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Recent Res. De v. Astron. Astrophys. 1 (2003) 625 [astro-ph/0303041]

  40. [40]

    A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, Phys. L ett. B 511 (2001) 265 [gr-qc/0103004]

  41. [41]

    Cosmic acceleration without quintessence

    N. Banerjee and D. Pavon, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 043504 [gr-qc/0012048]

  42. [42]

    A New Cosmological Model of Quintessence and Dark Matter

    V. Sahni and L. M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 103517 [astro-ph/9910097]

  43. [43]

    Extended Quintessence

    F. Perrotta, C. Baccigalupi and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev . D 61 (1999) 023507 [astro-ph/9906066]

  44. [44]

    Inflation and quintessence with nonminimal coupling

    V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 023504 [gr-qc/0002091]

  45. [45]

    D. F. Torres, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 043522 [astro-ph/0204504]

  46. [46]

    Coupled and Extended Quintessence: theoretical differences and structure formation

    V. Pettorino and C. Baccigalupi, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 103003 [arXiv:0802.1086 [astro-ph]]

  47. [47]

    Nonminimal coupling and quintessence

    O. Bertolami and P. J. Martins, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 064007 [gr-qc/9910056]

  48. [48]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. [Planck Collaboration], Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A20 [arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]]

  49. [49]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. [BICEP2 and Keck Array Collaborations], Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 031302 [arXiv:1510.09217 [astro-ph.CO]]

  50. [50]

    A. D. Linde, Lect. Notes Phys. 738 (2008) 1 [arXiv:0705.0164 [hep-th]]

  51. [51]

    Introduction to the th eory of the early universe: Cosmological perturbations and inflationary theory,

    D. S. Gorbunov and V. A. Rubakov, “Introduction to the th eory of the early universe: Cosmological perturbations and inflationary theory,” Hackensack, USA: World Scientific (20 11) 489 p

  52. [52]

    D. H. Lyth and A. Riotto, Phys. Rept. 314 (1999) 1 [hep-ph/9807278]

  53. [53]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 129B (1983) 177

  54. [54]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 162B (1985) 281

  55. [55]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220

  56. [56]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 748 [astro-ph/9307002]

  57. [57]

    A General Analytic Formula for the Spectral Index of the Density Perturbations produced during Inflation

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 (1996) 71 [astro-ph/9507001]

  58. [58]

    Turok, Class

    N. Turok, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 3449

  59. [59]

    A. D. Linde, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 163 (2006) 295 [hep-th/0503195]

  60. [60]

    Towards Inflation in String Theory

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister and S. P. Trivedi, JCAP 0310 (2003) 013 [hep-th/0308055]

  61. [61]

    Initial Conditions for Inflation - A Short Review

    R. Brandenberger, arXiv:1601.01918 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories

    K. Bamba and S. D. Odintsov, Symmetry 7 (2015) no.1, 220 [arXiv:1503.00442 [hep-th]]

  63. [63]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6 (2014) 75 [arXiv:1303.3787 [astro-ph.CO]]

  64. [64]

    The Best Inflationary Models After Planck

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, R. Trotta and V. Vennin, JCAP 1403 (2014) 039 [arXiv:1312.3529 [astro-ph.CO]]

  65. [65]

    Inflation and String Theory

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister, arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th ]. 109

  66. [66]

    TASI Lectures on Inflation

    D. Baumann, arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Inflationary Cosmology after Planck 2013

    A. Linde, arXiv:1402.0526 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck

    E. Pajer and M. Peloso, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214002 [arXiv:1305.3557 [hep-th]]

  69. [69]

    Supergravity based inflation models: a review

    M. Yamaguchi, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 103001 [arXiv:1101.2488 [astro-ph.CO]]

  70. [70]

    C. T. Byrnes and K. Y. Choi, Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 724525 [arXiv:1002.3110 [astro-ph.CO]]

  71. [71]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

  72. [72]

    Accelerating cosmology in modified gravity: from convenient $F(R)$ or string-inspired theory to bimetric $F(R)$ gravity

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phy s. 11 (2014) 1460006 [arXiv:1306.4426 [gr-qc]]

  73. [73]

    Introduction to Modified Gravity and Gravitational Alternative for Dark Energy

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, eConf C 0602061 (2006) 06 [Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4 (2007) 115] [hep-th/0601213]

  74. [74]

    Extended Theories of Gravity

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Phys. Rept. 509 (2011) 167 [arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]]

  75. [75]

    Faraoni and S

    V. Faraoni and S. Capozziello, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 170 (2010)

  76. [76]

    A bird's eye view of f(R)-gravity

    S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and V. Faraoni, Open Ast ron. J. 3 (2010) 49 [arXiv:0909.4672 [gr-qc]]

  77. [77]

    Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rept. 505 (2011) 59 [arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]]

  78. [78]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Ph ys. Rept. 513 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]]

  79. [79]

    The Universality of Einstein Equations

    M. Ferraris, M. Francaviglia and I. Volovich, Class. Qu ant. Grav. 11 (1994) 1505 [gr-qc/9303007]

  80. [80]

    X. H. Meng and P. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 584 (2004) 1 [hep-th/0309062]

Showing first 80 references.