Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DynaMarks: Defending Against Deep Learning Model Extraction Using Dynamic Watermarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.13321 v1 pith:UN4LDCOV submitted 2022-07-27 cs.CR cs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.CVcs.LG
keywords modeldynamarksoriginalextractionmodelssurrogatewatermarkdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The functionality of a deep learning (DL) model can be stolen via model extraction where an attacker obtains a surrogate model by utilizing the responses from a prediction API of the original model. In this work, we propose a novel watermarking technique called DynaMarks to protect the intellectual property (IP) of DL models against such model extraction attacks in a black-box setting. Unlike existing approaches, DynaMarks does not alter the training process of the original model but rather embeds watermark into a surrogate model by dynamically changing the output responses from the original model prediction API based on certain secret parameters at inference runtime. The experimental outcomes on Fashion MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet datasets demonstrate the efficacy of DynaMarks scheme to watermark surrogate models while preserving the accuracies of the original models deployed in edge devices. In addition, we also perform experiments to evaluate the robustness of DynaMarks against various watermark removal strategies, thus allowing a DL model owner to reliably prove model ownership.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper classifies model extraction attacks and defenses into attack, defense, and computing environment categories and surveys their current state.

Pith tools