Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Membership Inference Attacks and Privacy in Topic Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04451 v2 pith:UNGK2DQF submitted 2024-03-07 cs.CR cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelstopicmodelingprivacyattacksdatagenerativelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research shows that large language models are susceptible to privacy attacks that infer aspects of the training data. However, it is unclear if simpler generative models, like topic models, share similar vulnerabilities. In this work, we propose an attack against topic models that can confidently identify members of the training data in Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Our results suggest that the privacy risks associated with generative modeling are not restricted to large neural models. Additionally, to mitigate these vulnerabilities, we explore differentially private (DP) topic modeling. We propose a framework for private topic modeling that incorporates DP vocabulary selection as a pre-processing step, and show that it improves privacy while having limited effects on practical utility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tensor Topic Modeling Via HOSVD

    math.ST 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A HOSVD-based estimator for Tucker-decomposed tensor topic models recovers factor matrices and core tensor with entry-wise l1 error rates.

  2. Challenges in Guardrailing Large Language Models for Science

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing a guardrail framework with four dimensions (trustworthiness, ethics & bias, safety, legal) and implementation strategies for scientific LLM use.

Pith tools