Pith. sign in

REVIEW 18 cited by

AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Calls

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04253 v1 pith:UNRPMQSO submitted 2024-02-06 cs.CL

AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Calls

classification cs.CL
keywords anytoolprotocolqueriesapisevaluationgpt-4hierarchicalintroduce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce AnyTool, a large language model agent designed to revolutionize the utilization of a vast array of tools in addressing user queries. We utilize over 16,000 APIs from Rapid API, operating under the assumption that a subset of these APIs could potentially resolve the queries. AnyTool primarily incorporates three elements: an API retriever with a hierarchical structure, a solver aimed at resolving user queries using a selected set of API candidates, and a self-reflection mechanism, which re-activates AnyTool if the initial solution proves impracticable. AnyTool is powered by the function calling feature of GPT-4, eliminating the need for training external modules. We also revisit the evaluation protocol introduced by previous works and identify a limitation in this protocol that leads to an artificially high pass rate. By revising the evaluation protocol to better reflect practical application scenarios, we introduce an additional benchmark, termed AnyToolBench. Experiments across various datasets demonstrate the superiority of our AnyTool over strong baselines such as ToolLLM and a GPT-4 variant tailored for tool utilization. For instance, AnyTool outperforms ToolLLM by +35.4% in terms of average pass rate on ToolBench. Code will be available at https://github.com/dyabel/AnyTool.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Compositional Skill Routing for LLM Agents: Decompose, Retrieve, and Compose

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SkillWeaver formalizes compositional skill routing for LLM agents and introduces SAD, which raises step-level decomposition accuracy from 51% to 67.7% on a new 300-query benchmark over 2209 real MCP skills.

  2. RS-Claw: Progressive Active Tool Exploration via Hierarchical Skill Trees for Remote Sensing Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RS-Claw enables remote sensing agents to actively explore tools via hierarchical skill trees, achieving up to 86% token compression and outperforming flat registration and RAG baselines on Earth-Bench.

  3. Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    ToolHijacker optimizes malicious tool documents via a two-phase strategy to hijack LLM agents' tool selection in no-box settings.

  4. Scores Are Not Decisions: Cost-Aware Stopping for Tool Acquisition in LLM Agents

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Cost-aware stopping over ranked tool prefixes, trained on stop-versus-continue payoff gaps, beats score and sufficiency thresholds under heterogeneous tool costs.

  5. Maestro: Reinforcement Learning to Orchestrate Hierarchical Model-Skill Ensembles

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Maestro uses outcome-based RL to train a lightweight policy that orchestrates ensembles of frozen expert models and skills, reporting 70.1% average accuracy across ten multimodal benchmarks and outperforming GPT-5 and...

  6. The Scaling Laws of Skills in LLM Agent Systems

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Empirical analysis across 15 LLMs and 1,141 skills identifies a logarithmic routing decay law and a multiplicative execution law coupled by a single fitted slope parameter b that enables targeted library optimizations...

  7. ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ComplexMCP benchmark shows top LLM agents achieve under 60% success on dynamic interdependent tool tasks versus 90% for humans, due to tool retrieval saturation, over-confidence, and strategic defeatism.

  8. ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ComplexMCP benchmark shows current LLM agents achieve at most 60% success on interdependent tool tasks versus 90% for humans, due to tool retrieval saturation, over-confidence, and strategic defeatism.

  9. FitText: Evolving Agent Tool Ecologies via Memetic Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FitText embeds evolutionary retrieval of tool descriptions into the agent loop, yielding 2.7-10.6 point NDCG@5 gains on ToolRet and 26.7-point pass-rate gains on StableToolBench.

  10. FitText: Evolving Agent Tool Ecologies via Memetic Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FitText embeds memetic evolutionary retrieval inside the agent's reasoning loop to iteratively refine pseudo-tool descriptions, raising retrieval rank from 8.81 to 2.78 on ToolRet and pass rate to 0.73 on StableToolBench.

  11. FitText: Evolving Agent Tool Ecologies via Memetic Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Agents that evolve pseudo-tool search descriptions during execution reach an 84.3% StableToolBench pass rate, +26.7 points over static query retrieval, with gains growing with base-model capability.

  12. Capability Self-Assessment: Teaching LLMs to Know Their Limits

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reinforcement learning teaches LLMs to assess their own capabilities more effectively than supervised fine-tuning, preserves original skills, generalizes out of distribution, and aids local-cloud routing and data selection.

  13. A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey that taxonomizes agent skills for LLM-based agents across representation, acquisition, retrieval, and evolution stages while reviewing methods, resources, and open challenges.

  14. AutoTool: Dynamic Tool Selection and Integration for Agentic Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-12 reject novelty 5.0

    AutoTool's two-phase SFT/RL plus ranking training lets 8B LLM agents beat larger fixed-tool agents across math, search, code, and vision benchmarks, though unseen-tool gains are asserted, not isolated.

  15. A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper surveys agent skills for LLM agents, organizing the literature into a four-stage lifecycle of representation, acquisition, retrieval, and evolution while highlighting their role in system scalability.

  16. Bridging Perception and Action: A Lightweight Multimodal Meta-Planner Framework for Robust Earth Observation Agents

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The LMMP framework improves tool-calling accuracy and task success rates for Earth observation agents by grounding plans in multimodal features and remote sensing expert knowledge via a two-stage training process.

  17. Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Survey

    cs.AI 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.

  18. A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey that defines agent skills as reusable procedural artifacts and reviews methods, resources, and applications across their representation, acquisition, retrieval, and evolution stages.