Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Modifying Large Language Model Post-Training for Diverse Creative Writing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17126 v1 pith:UQ3MHYAW submitted 2025-03-21 cs.CL cs.LG

Modifying Large Language Model Post-Training for Diverse Creative Writing

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords diversityoutputqualitycreativemodelspost-trainingwritingapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As creative writing tasks do not have singular correct answers, large language models (LLMs) trained to perform these tasks should be able to generate diverse valid outputs. However, LLM post-training often focuses on improving generation quality but neglects to facilitate output diversity. Hence, in creative writing generation, we investigate post-training approaches to promote both output diversity and quality. Our core idea is to include deviation -- the degree of difference between a training sample and all other samples with the same prompt -- in the training objective to facilitate learning from rare high-quality instances. By adopting our approach to direct preference optimization (DPO) and odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), we demonstrate that we can promote the output diversity of trained models while minimally decreasing quality. Our best model with 8B parameters could achieve on-par diversity as a human-created dataset while having output quality similar to the best instruction-tuned models we examined, GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1. We further validate our approaches with a human evaluation, an ablation, and a comparison to an existing diversification approach, DivPO.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Task-Dependent Evaluation of LLM Output Homogenization: A Taxonomy-Guided Framework

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    Proposes a task taxonomy for functional diversity in LLM outputs, validates it via user study, introduces targeted sampling to boost diversity only where needed, and presents evidence that the diversity-quality tradeo...

  2. Anchorless Diversification for Parallel LLM Ideation

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Semantic direction stratification yields the best diversity-quality-compute frontier for parallel LLM ideation across creative tasks.

  3. LLM Jaggedness Unlocks Scientific Creativity

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Jagged capabilities in LLMs for scientific idea generation can be leveraged through inference-time ensembles to outperform individual models.

  4. Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A parameter-free sampling strategy called CUTS combined with Mixed-CUTS training prevents mode collapse in RL for saturated LLM reasoning tasks and raises AIME25 Pass@1 accuracy by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.

  5. Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversity

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Typicality bias (human preference for familiar text) is estimated as α>0 in preference data and mathematically sharpens aligned LLMs toward a single mode; prompting for a verbalized response distribution (Verbalized S...

  6. LLM Jaggedness Unlocks Scientific Creativity

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLMs exhibit jagged scientific creativity across models, prompts, and domains, and this unevenness can be leveraged via model ensembles to outperform any single model on idea generation.