Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Uncertainty-Aware Fusion: An Ensemble Framework for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.05757 v1 pith:USGW3XWW submitted 2025-02-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords hallucinationsllmsaccuracymethodsmodelsdifferentensembleframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to hallucinate and generate non-factual outputs which can undermine user trust. Traditional methods to directly mitigate hallucinations, such as representation editing and contrastive decoding, often require additional training data and involve high implementation complexity. While ensemble-based approaches harness multiple LLMs to tap into the "wisdom of crowds", these methods overlook uncertainties in individual model responses. Recent studies reveal that uncertainty estimation can enable LLMs to self-assess the likelihood of generating hallucinations. In this work, we focus on factoid question answering (QA) and observe that LLMs accuracy and self-assessment capabilities vary widely with different models excelling in different scenarios. Leveraging this insight, we propose Uncertainty-Aware Fusion (UAF), an ensemble framework to reduces hallucinations by strategically combining multiple LLM based on their accuracy and self-assessment abilities. Empirical results on several public benchmark datasets show that UAF outperforms state-of-the-art hallucination mitigation methods by $8\%$ in factual accuracy, while either narrowing or surpassing the performance gap with GPT-4.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Opti-Q: A Constraint-Based Optimization Framework for Multi-LLM Question Planning

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Per-question database-style plan search over multi-LLM DAGs improves QA quality under budgets by ~58% (MMLU-Pro) and ~41% (SimpleQA) versus reimplemented baselines.

  2. Simple Yet Effective: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Multi-LLM Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MUSE uses Jensen-Shannon divergence to pick a coherent subset of LLM predictions and averages them, improving binary-prediction calibration in several tasks.

  3. Enhancing Factual Accuracy and Citation Generation in LLMs via Multi-Stage Self-Verification

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a four-stage self-verification prompting method but explicitly labels its experimental results as fabricated, so it cannot support its claimed gains.

Pith tools