Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Analytic distribution of the optimal cross-correlation statistic for stochastic gravitational-wave-background searches using pulsar timing arrays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.01116 v1 pith:UTOTQLC6 submitted 2023-05-01 gr-qc astro-ph.IM

Analytic distribution of the optimal cross-correlation statistic for stochastic gravitational-wave-background searches using pulsar timing arrays

classification gr-qc astro-ph.IM
keywords distributionnullstatisticanalyticanalyticalarrayschi-squaredcross-correlation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show via both analytical calculation and numerical simulation that the optimal cross-correlation statistic (OS) for stochastic gravitational-wave-background (GWB) searches using data from pulsar timing arrays follows a generalized chi-squared (GX2) distribution-i.e., a linear combination of chi-squared distributions with coefficients given by the eigenvalues of the quadratic form defining the statistic. This observation is particularly important for calculating the frequentist statistical significance of a possible GWB detection, which depends on the exact form of the distribution of the OS signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) $\hat\rho \equiv \hat A_{\rm gw}^2/\sigma_0$ in the absence of GW-induced cross correlations (i.e., the null distribution). Previous discussions of the OS have incorrectly assumed that the analytic null distribution of $\hat\rho$ is well-approximated by a zero-mean unit-variance Gaussian distribution. Empirical calculations show that the null distribution of $\hat\rho$ has "tails" which differ significantly from those for a Gaussian distribution, but which follow (exactly) a GX2 distribution. So, a correct analytical assessment of the statistical significance of a potential detection requires the use of a GX2 distribution.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detecting Gravitational-Wave Anisotropies with Simulation-Based Inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A neural-network-based simulation inference method improves 3σ detection probability of gravitational-wave background anisotropies by 90-200% over Gaussian frequentist searches by learning non-Gaussian structure in pu...

  2. Stochastic gravitational-wave background search using data from five pulsar timing arrays

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Combined five-PTA dataset yields posterior on SGWB power-law amplitude and index consistent with nonzero signal but below 5-sigma significance, with reconstructed angular correlations matching the Hellings-Downs prediction.

  3. The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    astro-ph.HE 2023-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    EPTA second data release reports Bayes factor of 60 for an isotropic nanohertz GWB in the 10.3-year subset, with amplitude (2.5±0.7)×10^{-15} at 1 yr^{-1} when spectral index is fixed at 13/3.