pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.06256 · v3 · pith:UXZW3QZXnew · submitted 2026-01-09 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Universal Predictors for Mixing Time more than Liouvillian Gap

Yi-Neng Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 15:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords mixing timeLiouvillian gapLindblad master equationopen quantum systemstrace normrapid mixingdissipation design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mixing time of open quantum systems is set by both the Liouvillian gap and trace-norm factors of decaying eigenmodes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies how open quantum systems governed by the Lindblad master equation reach their steady states. It shows that the time required depends on the Liouvillian gap together with the trace-norm size of each decaying eigenmode. These trace-norm factors function as universal predictors that yield general conditions for fast and rapid mixing. The conditions appear as sparsity requirements on the Hamiltonian and Lindblad operators in both strong and weak dissipation regimes. The result supplies a model-independent way to compute mixing times and to engineer dissipation for faster state preparation.

Core claim

The mixing time is determined not only by the Liouvillian gap but also by the trace-norm factor of each decaying Liouvillian eigenmode. By treating these factors as universal predictors, general conditions for fast and rapid mixing are obtained, including explicit sparsity constraints on the Hamiltonian and local Lindblad operators that work in both strong and weak dissipation regimes.

What carries the argument

Trace-norm factor of each decaying Liouvillian eigenmode, used alongside the gap as an independent predictor of mixing time.

If this is right

  • Rapid mixing holds in the strong dissipation regime when the Hamiltonian and Lindblad operators satisfy suitable sparsity constraints.
  • Rapid mixing holds in the weak dissipation regime under analogous sparsity conditions.
  • Mixing time can be calculated directly from the spectrum and trace norms of the Liouvillian without case-by-case simulation.
  • Dissipation can be designed to achieve target mixing speeds for experimental state preparation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trace-norm predictors might apply to non-Markovian open systems if an analogous spectral decomposition exists.
  • Numerical checks on small qubit systems could test whether the predicted mixing time tracks the measured convergence across varied Lindblad operators.
  • Links to classical Markov-chain convergence may exist, where analogous norm factors refine the spectral-gap bound.

Load-bearing premise

Decaying eigenmodes of the Liouvillian possess well-defined trace-norm factors that act as independent predictors of mixing time without requiring post-selection or model-specific fitting.

What would settle it

Compute the actual time to reach steady state in a concrete Lindblad system, then check whether the observed time matches the value predicted from the gap plus the trace-norm factors of all modes; a clear mismatch would refute the predictors.

read the original abstract

We analyze the mixing time of open quantum systems governed by the Lindblad master equation, showing that it is determined not only by the Liouvillian gap, but also by the trace-norm factor of each decaying Liouvillian eigenmode. By utilizing them as universal predictors of mixing time, we establish general conditions for the fast and rapid mixing, respectively. Specifically, we derive rapid mixing conditions for both the strong and weak dissipation regimes, formulated as sparsity constraints on the Hamiltonian and the local Lindblad operators. Our findings provide a general framework for calculating mixing time and offer a guide for designing dissipation to achieve desired mixing speeds, which has significant implications for efficient experimental state preparation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the mixing time of open quantum systems under the Lindblad master equation is determined not only by the Liouvillian gap but also by the trace-norm factors of each decaying Liouvillian eigenmode. These factors are positioned as universal predictors that enable derivation of general conditions for fast and rapid mixing, specifically sparsity constraints on the Hamiltonian and local Lindblad operators in both strong and weak dissipation regimes. The work presents this as a framework for computing mixing times and engineering dissipation for controlled mixing speeds with implications for quantum state preparation.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the introduction of trace-norm factors as independent predictors beyond the spectral gap would provide a more refined tool for analyzing relaxation in open quantum systems. The sparsity-based conditions for rapid mixing could offer practical design principles for dissipative engineering, potentially improving efficiency in experimental state preparation protocols.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on eigenmode decomposition and mixing-time predictors] The eigenmode expansion underlying the mixing-time bound (see the derivation of the deviation from steady state in the section introducing the universal predictors) assumes the Liouvillian admits a complete eigenbasis with purely exponential decay. No discussion addresses possible Jordan blocks for eigenvalues with Re(λ) closest to zero; such blocks would introduce polynomial prefactors t^{m-1} that cannot be absorbed into fixed trace-norm factors and would invalidate the claimed universality of the predictors as well as the rapid-mixing sparsity conditions derived from them.
  2. [Section deriving rapid mixing conditions for weak dissipation] In the rapid-mixing conditions for the weak-dissipation regime (formulated as sparsity constraints), the trace-norm factors are treated as bounded independently of system size once sparsity holds. However, the manuscript does not provide an explicit bound or scaling argument showing that these factors remain O(1) under the stated sparsity; without this, the separation between gap and trace-norm contributions is not fully load-bearing for the rapid-mixing claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'trace-norm factor' without a brief definition or reference to its precise mathematical expression; adding one sentence would improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the trace-norm factor (e.g., whether it is ||v_k||_1 or a normalized variant) should be introduced consistently at first use and cross-referenced in later sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The eigenmode expansion underlying the mixing-time bound (see the derivation of the deviation from steady state in the section introducing the universal predictors) assumes the Liouvillian admits a complete eigenbasis with purely exponential decay. No discussion addresses possible Jordan blocks for eigenvalues with Re(λ) closest to zero; such blocks would introduce polynomial prefactors t^{m-1} that cannot be absorbed into fixed trace-norm factors and would invalidate the claimed universality of the predictors as well as the rapid-mixing sparsity conditions derived from them.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation on the eigenmode decomposition. The derivation of the mixing-time bound in the section introducing the universal predictors relies on a complete eigenbasis with purely exponential decay, which implicitly assumes that the Liouvillian is diagonalizable. While Jordan blocks are possible for non-normal operators such as the Liouvillian, they are nongeneric for typical Lindblad operators arising in physical models. Our sparsity conditions target generic cases where the algebraic and geometric multiplicities coincide. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit remark clarifying this assumption and noting that the trace-norm factors serve as universal predictors under diagonalizability; we will also indicate that extensions to nontrivial Jordan structure are left for future work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the rapid-mixing conditions for the weak-dissipation regime (formulated as sparsity constraints), the trace-norm factors are treated as bounded independently of system size once sparsity holds. However, the manuscript does not provide an explicit bound or scaling argument showing that these factors remain O(1) under the stated sparsity; without this, the separation between gap and trace-norm contributions is not fully load-bearing for the rapid-mixing claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for a more explicit scaling argument. In the weak-dissipation regime the sparsity constraints on the Hamiltonian and local Lindblad operators are constructed to ensure both a finite gap and bounded trace-norm factors. Although the manuscript states that these factors remain O(1) under sparsity, a detailed scaling argument is not supplied. We will revise the relevant section to include a perturbative scaling analysis showing that, under the stated locality and sparsity conditions, the trace-norm factors of the relevant eigenmodes remain independent of system size to leading order. This will make the separation between gap and trace-norm contributions fully rigorous for the rapid-mixing claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains independent of inputs

full rationale

The abstract and provided context frame the trace-norm factors as derived quantities from the Liouvillian eigenmodes rather than quantities fitted to or defined by the mixing time itself. No quoted step reduces a claimed predictor to a post-hoc fit, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central decomposition into gap plus static factors is presented as a general consequence of the spectral structure under the Lindblad equation, without evidence that the predictors are constructed by renaming or smuggling in the target mixing-time result. The Jordan-block concern raised externally is an assumption-validity issue, not a circularity reduction. The derivation chain therefore stays self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that open quantum dynamics are described by a Lindblad master equation whose spectrum consists of decaying eigenmodes with associated trace norms.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Open quantum systems evolve according to the Lindblad master equation.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the governing dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5640 in / 1228 out tokens · 64472 ms · 2026-05-21T15:26:00.827342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Transport in Disordered Spin Networks: Emergent Timescales and Competing Pathways

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Geometric heterogeneity in small disordered spin networks with dipolar couplings and dephasing produces separated dynamical timescales, with a parametrically long relaxation time arising from effective detuning in str...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (12) Here,Nis the dimension of the open system’s Hilbert space

    = √ N . (12) Here,Nis the dimension of the open system’s Hilbert space. The final equality holds because Tr(σ 2

    work page

  2. [2]

    Thus, D(eLtρ0, σ)≤ |c1| 2 √ N e−∆t.(13) The equality is taken whenσ 1 has eigenvalues that are pairs of ( 1√ N ,− 1√ N )[83]

    = 1, 3 which is due to the normalization of the eigenstates. Thus, D(eLtρ0, σ)≤ |c1| 2 √ N e−∆t.(13) The equality is taken whenσ 1 has eigenvalues that are pairs of ( 1√ N ,− 1√ N )[83]. Combining this with the defini- tion of mixing time, we arrive at a general upper bound of mixing time: τmix(η)≤ 1 2∆−1 log(N)−2 log 2η |c1| .(14) For a system of sizeLan...

    work page

  3. [3]

    the inverse gap scales at most polylogarithmically, ∆−1 ≤ O poly[log(L)] ; (17)

    work page

  4. [4]

    the lowest excited state has at most polynomial trace norm, Tr|σ1| ≤ O poly(L) .(18) Unlike fast mixing, rapid mixing requires an explicit constraint onσ 1. A simple sufficient mechanism is a globalU(1) symmetry shared by both the Hamiltonian and the dissipators: the Liouvillian then decomposes into charge sectors, and if the relevant sectors have Hilbert...

    work page

  5. [5]

    large” part), and the remaining entries toB (the “small

    = 1 (Hermitianσ 1), which implies∥σ 1∥2 = 1. Strong-dissipation regime In the strong-dissipation regime, we assume thatKis diagonalizable. The unperturbed doubled-space (vectorized) eigenbasis is{|ϵ p, ϵq⟩} ≡ {|ϵ p⟩L ⊗ |ϵq⟩R}, where|ϵ s⟩are simultaneous eigenstates of the Lindblad operators{K j}. The leading correction to the state|ϵ m, ϵm⟩, induced by th...

    work page

  6. [6]

    terms proportional toK pmKqn (the double sum in the last line), which populateO(N 2) entries in the{|E p, Eq⟩} basis

    work page

  7. [7]

    Accordingly, we decompose B=B 1 +B 2,(53) whereB 1 collects theO(N 2) coefficients proportional toK pmKqn andB 2 collects theO(N) coefficients proportional to (K 2)pm or (K 2)qn

    terms proportional to (K 2)pm or (K 2)qn (the first two sums), which populateO(N) entries. Accordingly, we decompose B=B 1 +B 2,(53) whereB 1 collects theO(N 2) coefficients proportional toK pmKqn andB 2 collects theO(N) coefficients proportional to (K 2)pm or (K 2)qn. By construction, every entry ofBhas magnitude at mostc. Therefore, ∥B1∥2 2 ≤N 2c2 ⇒ ∥B ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Becauseρ 0 is a physical density matrix, its purity obeys Tr(ρ 2 0)≤1

    = 1.(67) We then generally write the initial state as ρ0 =σ 0 +c 1σ1,(68) whereσ 0 denotes the steady state. Becauseρ 0 is a physical density matrix, its purity obeys Tr(ρ 2 0)≤1. Expanding and applying Cauchy–Schwarz, Tr(ρ2

    work page

  9. [9]

    + 2c1 Tr(σ0σ1) +c 2 1 Tr(σ2 1) ≤Tr(σ 2

    work page

  10. [10]

    +|c 1|2 Tr(σ2 1) = Tr(σ2

    work page

  11. [11]

    Therefore, the physical constraint Tr(ρ 2 0)≤1 implies that|c 1| cannot grow with system size; in particular,c 1 =O(1) under our normalization

    +|c 1|2 ≤1 + 2|c 1|+|c 1|2 = (1 +|c 1|)2.(69) In the last line we used Tr(σ 2 0)≤1 and p Tr(σ2 0)≤1. Therefore, the physical constraint Tr(ρ 2 0)≤1 implies that|c 1| cannot grow with system size; in particular,c 1 =O(1) under our normalization. With this convention, any potentiale L enhancement in the contribution of the slowest mode must come from the tr...

    work page

  12. [12]

    ∗ zhouyn.physics@gmail.com

    = 1 used in the main text. ∗ zhouyn.physics@gmail.com

    work page

  13. [13]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, 3rd ed., Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. Brandao, D. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, J. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, C. M. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, K. Guerin, S. Habegger, M. Harrigan, M. Hartmann, A. Ho, M. R. Hoffmann, T. Huang, T. Humble, S. Isako...

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Physics14, 988 (2018)

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Physics14, 988 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    X. Mi, P. Roushan, C. Quintana, S. Mandr` a, J. Mar- shall, C. Neill, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Bab- bush, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, J. Basso, A. Bengts- son, S. Boixo, A. Bourassa, M. Broughton, B. B. Buck- ley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, S. Demura, A. R. Derk, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, C. Er...

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    K. A. Landsman, C. Figgatt, T. Schuster, N. M. Linke, B. Yoshida, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Verified quantum information scrambling, Nature567, 61–65 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Vermersch, A

    B. Vermersch, A. Elben, L. Sieberer, N. Yao, and P. Zoller, Probing scrambling using statistical correla- tions between randomized measurements, Physical Re- view X9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.021061 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.021061 2019

  20. [20]

    Bhattacharya, P

    A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, Operator growth and krylov construction in dissipative open quantum systems, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 10.1007/jhep12(2022)081 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2022)081 2022

  21. [21]

    Schuster and N

    T. Schuster and N. Y. Yao, Operator growth in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 160402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    C. Liu, H. Tang, and H. Zhai, Krylov complexity in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033085 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, Journal of High Energy Physics2014, 10.1007/jhep03(2014)067 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)067 2014

  24. [24]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 10.1007/jhep08(2016)106 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2016)106 2016

  25. [25]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Soviet Jour- nal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics28, 1200 (1969)

    work page 1969

  26. [26]

    S. V. Syzranov, A. V. Gorshkov, and V. Galitski, Out- of-time-order correlators in finite open systems, Physical Review B97, 10.1103/physrevb.97.161114 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.161114 2018

  27. [27]

    L.-P. Han, J. Zou, H. Li, and B. Shao, Quantum informa- tion scrambling in non-markovian open quantum system, Entropy24, 1532 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Y.-N. Zhou, T. Zhou, and P. Zhang, General properties of the spectral form factor in open quantum systems, Frontiers of Physics (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Zhou and C

    Y.-N. Zhou and C. Liu, Generalized loschmidt echo and information scrambling in open systems (2024), arXiv:2412.01851 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissi- pative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  31. [31]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Re- views of Modern Physics85, 299–366 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Raftery, D

    J. Raftery, D. Sadri, S. Schmidt, H. T¨ ureci, and A. Houck, Observation of a dissipation-induced clas- sical to quantum transition, Physical Review X4, 10.1103/physrevx.4.031043 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.031043 2014

  33. [33]

    Schmitt and M

    M. Schmitt and M. Heyl, Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks, Physi- cal Review Letters125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.100503 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.100503 2020

  34. [34]

    F. Fang, K. Wang, V. S. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Cimmino, J. Wei, M. Bintz, A. Parr, J. Kemp, K.-K. Ni, and N. Y. Yao, Probing critical phenomena in open quantum sys- tems using atom arrays (2024), arXiv:2402.15376 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Zhou, T.-G

    Y.-N. Zhou, T.-G. Zhou, and P. Zhang, General prop- erties of the spectral form factor in open quantum sys- tems, Frontiers of Physics19, 10.1007/s11467-024-1406-7 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1007/s11467-024-1406-7 2024

  36. [36]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum reser- voir engineering with laser cooled trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4728 (1996)

    work page 1996

  37. [37]

    M. B. Plenio, S. F. Huelga, A. Beige, and P. L. Knight, Cavity-loss-induced generation of entangled atoms, Phys- ical Review A59, 2468–2475 (1999)

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nature Physics4, 878–883 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Preparation of entangled states by quantum markov processes, Physical Review A78, 10.1103/physreva.78.042307 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.042307 2008

  40. [40]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. Wolf, and J. Cirac, Quantum compu- tation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipa- tion, Nature Physics5, 633 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Krauter, C

    H. Krauter, C. A. Muschik, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, J. M. Petersen, J. I. Cirac, and E. S. Polzik, Entangle- ment generated by dissipation and steady state entangle- ment of two macroscopic objects, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 080503 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Diehl, E

    S. Diehl, E. Rico, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Topology by dissipation in atomic quantum wires, Nature Physics 7, 971–977 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    J. T. Barreiro, M. M¨ uller, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, C. F. Roos, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions, Nature470, 486–491 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    M. J. Kastoryano, F. Reiter, and A. S. Sørensen, Dissipative preparation of entanglement in optical cavities, Physical Review Letters106, 10.1103/phys- revlett.106.090502 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2011

  45. [45]

    Bardyn, M

    C.-E. Bardyn, M. A. Baranov, C. V. Kraus, E. Rico, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl, Topology by dissi- pation, New Journal of Physics15, 085001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Y. Lin, J. P. Gaebler, F. Reiter, T. R. Tan, R. Bowler, A. S. Sørensen, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Dissi- pative production of a maximally entangled steady state of two quantum bits, Nature504, 415–418 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Shankar, M

    S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, Z. Leghtas, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, U. Vool, S. M. Girvin, L. Frunzio, M. Mir- rahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Autonomously stabilized en- 14 tanglement between two superconducting quantum bits, Nature504, 419 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science347, 853–857 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Ding, C.-F

    Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via lindbladians, Physical Review Re- search6, 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033147 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033147 2024

  50. [50]

    Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Rapid quantum ground state prepa- ration via dissipative dynamics (2025), arXiv:2503.15827 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Lin, Dissipative preparation of many-body quantum states: Towards practical quantum advantage (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

    L. Lin, Dissipative preparation of many-body quantum states: Towards practical quantum advantage (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Lloyd, A

    J. Lloyd, A. A. Michailidis, X. Mi, V. Smelyanskiy, and D. A. Abanin, Quasiparticle cooling algorithms for quan- tum many-body state preparation, PRX Quantum6, 010361 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics21, 467 (1982)

    work page 1982

  54. [54]

    Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [55]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum sim- ulation, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, Quantum sim- ulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012)

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. Haensch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    B. P. Lanyon, C. Hempel, D. Nigg, M. M¨ uller, R. Ger- ritsma, F. Z¨ ahringer, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Rambach, G. Kirchmair, M. Hennrich, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Universal digital quantum sim- ulation with trapped ions, Science334, 57–61 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Na- ture534, 516–519 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    F. L. Marquezino, R. Portugal, G. Abal, and R. Donan- gelo, Mixing times in quantum walks on the hypercube, Phys. Rev. A77, 042312 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Relaxation times of dissipative many-body quantum systems, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Relaxation times of dissipative many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E92, 042143 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    Ding, C.-F

    Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033147 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, inProceedings of the twenty-eighth an- nual ACM symposium on Theory of computing(ACM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 1996) pp. 212–219

    work page 1996

  65. [65]

    Aharonov, A

    D. Aharonov, A. Ambainis, J. Kempe, and U. Vazirani, Quantum walks on graphs, inProceedings of the Thirty- Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2001, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, July 6-8, 2001 (ACM, 2001) pp. 50–59

    work page 2001

  66. [66]

    Huang,Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed

    K. Huang,Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, 1987)

    work page 1987

  67. [67]

    D. A. Levin, Y. Peres, and E. L. Wilmer,Markov Chains and Mixing Times, Fields Institute Monographs, Vol. 36 (American Mathematical Society, 2009)

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    Diaconis and L

    P. Diaconis and L. Saloff-Coste, A note on the conver- gence of markov chains, The Annals of Applied Proba- bility3, 696 (1993)

    work page 1993

  69. [69]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai, Resolving a discrepancy be- tween liouvillian gap and relaxation time in boundary- dissipated quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Mori, Metastability associated with many-body explo- sion of eigenmode expansion coefficients, Phys

    T. Mori, Metastability associated with many-body explo- sion of eigenmode expansion coefficients, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Lesanovsky and H

    I. Lesanovsky and H. P. B¨ uchler, Dissipative phase tran- sitions and non-equilibrium steady states of a spin chain, Journal of Statistical Physics151, 523 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    T. E. Lee, C.-K. Chan, and S. F. Yelin, Dissipative phase transitions: Independent versus collective decay and spin squeezing, Phys. Rev. A90, 052109 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A98, 042118 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Huybrechts, F

    D. Huybrechts, F. Minganti, F. Nori, M. Wouters, and N. Shammah, Validity of mean-field theory in a dissipa- tive critical system: Liouvillian gap,PT-symmetric anti- gap, and permutational symmetry in theXYZmodel, Phys. Rev. B101, 214302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Huber, P

    J. Huber, P. Kirton, and P. Rabl, Nonequilibrium mag- netic phases in spin lattices with gain and loss, Phys. Rev. A102, 012219 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nature Physics4, 878 (2008)

    work page 2008

  77. [77]

    Temme, Lower bounds to the spectral gap of davies generators, Journal of Mathematical Physics54, 10.1063/1.4850896 (2013)

    K. Temme, Lower bounds to the spectral gap of davies generators, Journal of Mathematical Physics54, 10.1063/1.4850896 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4850896 2013

  78. [78]

    M. J. Kastoryano and F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, Quantum Gibbs Samplers: The Commuting Case, Commun. Math. Phys.344, 915 (2016)

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    Zegarlinski, Log-sobolev inequalities for infinite one dimensional lattice systems, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics133, 147 (1990)

    B. Zegarlinski, Log-sobolev inequalities for infinite one dimensional lattice systems, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics133, 147 (1990)

    work page 1990

  80. [80]

    S. G. Bobkov and P. Tetali, Modified logarithmic sobolev inequalities in discrete settings, Journal of Theoretical Probability19, 289 (2006)

    work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.