Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 14 cited by

EMO2: End-Effector Guided Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that co-speech avatar video can be factored into audio-to-hand generation followed by pixel-space inverse kinematics, and that this beats current state-of-the-art baselines on quality and synchronization.

desk verdict A genuinely new control abstraction—audio-to-hand-only-to-video—wrapped in a two-stage diffusion pipeline whose headline IK claim is asserted, not isolated, because the evaluated system also conditions on keypoints and a pose discriminator. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10687 v1 pith:UY2U6RQ5 submitted 2025-01-18 cs.CV

Linrui Tian , Siqi Hu , Qi Wang , Bang Zhang , Liefeng Bo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords audio-drivenvideogenerationco-speechgesturediffusionmodelhandposeinversekinematicstalkingheadanimationMANOend-effectorcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that co-speech avatar video generation is better solved by first mapping audio to hand gestures and then letting a video diffusion model infer the rest of the upper body, rather than by trying to predict full-body pose from audio. The authors base this on the observation that hand motion—the body's 'end-effector'—correlates with audio more strongly than other joints, and that modern pixel-based generative models have absorbed an implicit inverse kinematics prior, so hand signals can drive natural arms, torso, and head movement. They build a two-stage pipeline that outputs MANO hand parameters from audio, renders them into control maps, and feeds those maps together with 2D keypoints into a ReferenceNet-based video generator. Reported results show higher motion diversity and better beat alignment than SMPL-based gesture generators, and better synchronization and motion richness than CyberHost and Vlogger on their demonstration videos.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the authors' 'pixels prior IK' hypothesis: a video diffusion backbone pretrained on natural pixels implicitly encodes human inverse kinematics, so hand-only control maps can determine the rest of the upper body. The explicit machinery is a two-stage diffusion system: Stage 1 uses a diffusion transformer (DiT) with wav2vec audio features, adaptive layer norm timestep injection, and style/speed/reference-image embeddings to generate 134 MANO parameters per hand sequence; Stage 2 uses a ReferenceNet-based denoising U-Net with AnimateDiff temporal modules, injecting audio features, MANO maps, 2D upper-body keypoints that are temporally median-filtered to allow creative freedom, and a hand confidence embedding, plus a pose discriminator loss to keep the body structure plausible.

What would settle it

Run the stage-2 video generator with only MANO hand maps as conditioning (removing the keypoint guidance and pose discriminator) on audio clips that prompt large, fast hand gestures, and measure upper-body pose error against ground-truth video; if the torso and arms become implausible while the hands stay accurate, the 'pixels prior IK' premise fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the difficult full-body audio-to-pose mapping can be replaced by a much easier audio-to-hand mapping plus the body-completion ability of a pretrained pixel diffusion model. The authors observe that human speakers move their hands in ways that track speech rhythm, and that robotic manipulation similarly plans only an end-effector and relies on inverse kinematics for the rest of the limb. They therefore generate MANO hand parameters—a compact parametric hand representation—from audio using a diffusion transformer, synthesize hand control maps, and condition a video diffusion model on those maps so that it produces synchronized lips, expressive face, and coherent arms and torso. In comparisons, the resulting videos show clearer hand structure, more variable hand motion, and better audio-visual synchronization than the available baselines, at the cost of only a hand-level annotation requirement.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the pretrained video diffusion model has a reliable implicit inverse kinematics prior, so that hand-only MANO control maps can produce natural, structurally correct upper-body motion without explicit body-pose conditioning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Co-speech avatar animation can be built from an audio-to-hand model plus a pixel-space body-completion model, so expensive full-body SMPL fitting is not required at inference.
  • Because only MANO hand parameters are generated, the pipeline produces more diverse and beat-aligned hand gestures than SMPL-based generators such as Talkshow and DiffSHEG.
  • Video outputs from this two-stage design show clearer hand structure (HKC), more hand motion (HKV), and better lip synchronization (Sync-C) than CyberHost and Vlogger on their available demo videos.
  • Hand-confidence conditioning, 2D keypoint guidance, and a pose discriminator are needed in stage 2 to keep the torso natural when hand signals demand large movements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The end-effector principle likely generalizes: feet, gaze, or head orientation might serve as similarly sparse controllers for lower-body or attentive motion in other audio-driven animation tasks, a direction the paper does not explore.
  • The paper asserts a strong audio-hand correlation but never quantifies it per joint; a direct correlation analysis on a large co-speech dataset would test the foundation and could reveal which joints actually lead.
  • The admission that hand-only control produced unnatural torso motion means the 'pixels prior IK' hypothesis holds only within a limited movement envelope; mapping that envelope would make the method's failure modes predictable.
  • The two-stage design could lower data annotation costs: it requires MANO hand labels and 2D keypoints rather than full SMPL body fits, which may make scaling to diverse internet video easier.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. EMO2 proposes a two-stage audio-driven avatar video generation framework. Stage 1 is a diffusion-transformer motion model that maps audio (plus style, speed, and optional reference-image embeddings) to MANO hand parameters, with the intended output serving as the sole end-effector control for the upper body. Stage 2 is an EMO-style ReferenceNet video diffusion model that denoises video latents while conditioning on audio, MANO hand maps, upper-body keypoint maps, hand-confidence embeddings, and a pose-discriminator loss. The paper's central conceptual claim is that hand movements alone suffice to describe upper-body motion because the pretrained video backbone encodes an implicit 'pixels prior IK' prior. Quantitative comparisons are reported against EchoMimicV2 and MimicMotion on the EMTD dataset and against CyberHost and Vlogger demo videos, with the abstract claiming superiority in visual quality and synchronization accuracy.

Significance. If the central mechanism were validated, the factored formulation of audio-to-hand followed by pixel-space inverse kinematics would be a practically useful simplification for co-speech gesture generation, and the two-stage design is well motivated by the weak correspondence between audio and full-body pose. The paper also has concrete strengths: it compares against external open baselines and against publicly released demo videos, uses a broad metric suite (FID, FVD, SSIM, PSNR, Sync-C, EFID, HKC, HKV, CSIM), and trains on a substantial 275-hour dataset. However, the distinctive contribution is asserted rather than isolated: the final system adds keypoint maps and a pose discriminator precisely because hand-only control was observed to fail, and the missing ablations prevent attribution of the reported gains to the proposed mechanism. The headline comparison against CyberHost and Vlogger is also thinner than the abstract suggests, as only a subset of metrics is reported for those methods and no statistical uncertainty is given.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3 vs Section 3.4; Table 2] The central claim that 'using hand movements alone suffices to describe upper body motion' (Section 3.3) is not the system that is actually evaluated. Section 3.4 states that hand-only control produced 'large movements of the MANO hand signals were often incompatible with static torso, leading to unnatural performance,' and the remedy was to add joint keypoint maps, median-filtered keypoint guidance, and a pose discriminator. Table 2 ablate 'w/o motion gen' and 'w/o hand confidence' but never remove the keypoint guidance or the pose discriminator, so the reported quality gains cannot be attributed to the 'pixels prior IK' mechanism rather than to explicit 2D keypoint conditioning. Please add ablations that isolate (i) hand maps only, (ii) hand maps plus keypoint maps, and (iii) the full system, and report the same metrics plus an upper-body keypoint accuracy or structural-consistency metric for each variant.
  2. [Table 2; Abstract] The abstract claims the method 'outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, such as CyberHost and Vlogger, in terms of both visual quality and synchronization accuracy,' but Table 2 does not support the visual-quality part of that claim for those baselines. For CyberHost and Vlogger, only Sync-C, HKC, HKV, and CSIM are reported on 12 and 30 demo videos, respectively; no FID/FVD/SSIM/PSNR are given, and no error bars, number of seeds, or significance tests accompany any entry in Table 2. In addition, Ours has a worse FID than MimicMotion (27.28 vs 25.38), so the general 'outperforms state-of-the-art' statement is too broad. Please report comparable image/video quality metrics on the demo-based comparisons, provide multiple-seed or confidence-interval information, and temper the abstract/conclusion claims to what the data actually support.
  3. [Section 3.4, Figure 3] The description of what Stage 1 outputs is internally unclear. The text says 'The MANO maps and keypoint maps generated in Stage 1 are concatenated channel-wise,' while Section 3.3 says 'we only generate co-speech hand motions as the driving signal.' Section 3.4 then states 'the stage 1 model is trained using only 2D keypoint annotations,' which suggests a different training signal from MANO. This makes it impossible to determine where the keypoint maps come from at inference time and whether the hand-motion generator is independent of keypoint supervision. Please clarify the exact inputs and outputs of each stage, including how the upper-body keypoints are produced and whether they are used as training supervision, inference-time conditioning, or both.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4 header] The section header 'Experimets' should be 'Experiments'.
  2. [Section 4.2] There are typos: 'forward winematics' should be 'forward kinematics', and 'MimicMoton' should be 'MimicMotion'.
  3. [Table 2] The metric header 'PNSR' should be 'PSNR'.
  4. [Figure 4] The hand-position distribution plots have no axis labels or units; please add them so the claimed wider range of motion is interpretable.
  5. [Section 3.4] The pose-discriminator loss L_pd is described but the total training objective is not written out; please give the full loss alongside Equation (1) so the training procedure is reproducible.
  6. [Table 2 caption] In the 'w/o motion gen' row, ground-truth pose is used as the driving signal; the caption should state explicitly that this is an oracle-upper-bound ablation of the motion generator, not a variant of the proposed method.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity found: the pipeline is evaluated against external baselines, and the 'pixels prior IK' premise is an asserted hypothesis, not an output defined by its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical rather than definitional. Stage 1 trains a DiT from scratch to map audio to MANO hand parameters, and Stage 2 animates a reference image under hand, keypoint, and audio guidance. The headline comparisons use external baselines (EchoMimicV2, MimicMotion, CyberHost demo videos, Vlogger demo videos, Talkshow baselines), and the 'w/o motion gen' ablation substitutes ground-truth poses rather than the paper's own generated motions, so no claimed prediction is fitted to the same target it is said to predict. The 'pixels prior IK' statement in Section 3.3 is an asserted motivation, not a derived theorem, and Section 3.4's admission that hand-only control failed and required keypoints and a pose discriminator weakens the claim but does not make it circular. Self-citations are present and structural—Stage 2 builds on the authors' EMO backbone and the EFID metric is adopted from EMO—but these are not used as the justification for the core contribution; EMO is a published method and EFID is a measurement tool. No equation or fitted parameter reduces by construction to the paper's own output. The main concerns are evidentiary (unmeasured IK prior, missing ablations) and belong to correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The two-stage design trades a hard problem (audio-to-full-body) for an easier one (audio-to-hands) plus a borrowed assumption (the video backbone can infer the body from hands). That borrowed assumption is the largest unexplained cost in the paper: it is stated as a discovery but supported only by end-to-end metrics, and it is partially contradicted by the authors' own need for supplementary keypoint and pose-supervision modules. The free parameters are mostly unreported hyperparameters (speed bucket geometry, median filter size, style buckets, discriminator weight) with no sensitivity analysis. No new entity is introduced with an independent falsifiable handle; the 'pixels prior IK' concept, the hand confidence embedding, and the pose discriminator are validated only inside the paper's own pipeline.

free parameters (5)
  • Speed and amplitude bucket geometry = not reported
    Section 3.3: hand movements are filtered into speed buckets, each with a center and radius, and movement amplitude is encoded via the variance of hand translation. Bucket centers, radii, and the amplitude proxy are hand-chosen and unreported.
  • Median filter kernel size for keypoint maps = not reported (only described as large-kernel)
    Section 3.4: a large-kernel temporal median filter deliberately misaligns keypoints with joints; the kernel size is unspecified and no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • Motion context and padding lengths = 12 previous frames; 300-frame padding; 24-frame clips; 12 motion frames
    Section 3.3 and Section 4.1: these sequence lengths are fixed choices without ablation; they determine how the model transitions between clips.
  • Style embedding categories = singing, speaking, gesture dance
    Section 3.3: discrete hand-defined style buckets are added to the timestep embedding; how the 275 hours of training data were assigned to buckets is not described.
  • Pose discriminator loss weight
    Section 3.4: Lpd = ||H - H_hat||^2 is added to the denoising loss, but its relative weight and pretraining details for the ResNet discriminator are not reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Audio correlates more strongly with hand motion than with arm or torso motion during speech
    Stated in Section 1 as 'a key observation' and relied on in Section 3.3 to justify generating only hand poses; no quantitative correlation analysis is provided anywhere in the paper.
  • domain assumption Pixel-pretrained video diffusion backbones contain an implicit human-body inverse kinematics prior sufficient to infer natural upper-body motion from hand positions alone
    Introduced as 'pixels prior IK' in Section 1 and used in Section 3.3; Section 3.4 concedes hand-only control produced 'unnatural performance', which required adding keypoint guidance and a pose discriminator.
  • domain assumption MANO hand annotations in MOSEI, AVSPEECH, and additional internet videos are accurate enough to serve as training targets once invalid frames are masked
    Section 3.3 acknowledges annotations are 'inaccurate or missing' in some frames; masks and hand confidence scores compensate, but the residual annotation quality is never measured.
  • standard math Standard diffusion training objectives and architectures (DDPM objective, DiT, LDM and ReferenceNet) transfer to this setting without modification
    The pipeline adopts the DDPM objective (Eq. 1), DiT backbone, and ReferenceNet/AnimateDiff backbones from prior work as-is.
  • ad hoc to paper Deliberately misaligned, median-filtered 2D keypoints still improve generated body movement
    Section 3.4 filters keypoints 'to intentionally misalign with the body joints' so the model keeps creative freedom; no ablation or citation supports this counterintuitive choice.
invented entities (3)
  • 'Pixels prior IK' concept
    purpose: Justifies generating hand-only MANO control and delegating all other upper-body motion to the pretrained video backbone
    Introduced in Section 1 as the central motivation; no direct measurement of the backbone's IK competence exists, and Section 3.4 shows hand-only control produced unnatural motion until extra supervision modules were added.
  • Hand confidence embedding
    purpose: Conditions the video model on per-frame MANO detection reliability to improve rendered hand quality
    Section 3.4: a trainable embedding is multiplied by hand confidence scores and added to latents. The only support is the 'w/o hand confidence' ablation in Table 2, which is mixed: HKC improves from 0.537 to 0.553 and Sync-C from 4.11 to 4.58, but FID worsens from 25.82 to 27.28.
  • Pose discriminator
    purpose: Reinforces body structure during training by predicting pose keypoints and limb heatmaps from one-step denoised latents
    Section 3.4: a ResNet pretrained in latent space computes Lpd = ||H - H_hat||^2; no ablation isolates its contribution, and its pretraining dataset is unspecified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EMO2: End-Effector Guided Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UY2U6RQ5

@misc{pith2026250110687,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EMO2: End-Effector Guided Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UY2U6RQ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10687}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel audio-driven talking head method capable of simultaneously generating highly expressive facial expressions and hand gestures. Unlike existing methods that focus on generating full-body or half-body poses, we investigate the challenges of co-speech gesture generation and identify the weak correspondence between audio features and full-body gestures as a key limitation. To address this, we redefine the task as a two-stage process. In the first stage, we generate hand poses directly from audio input, leveraging the strong correlation between audio signals and hand movements. In the second stage, we employ a diffusion model to synthesize video frames, incorporating the hand poses generated in the first stage to produce realistic facial expressions and body movements. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, such as CyberHost and Vlogger, in terms of both visual quality and synchronization accuracy. This work provides a new perspective on audio-driven gesture generation and a robust framework for creating expressive and natural talking head animations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10687 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The motivation behind our method. Human motion, sim￾ilar to that of robots, involves planning the ”end-effector” (EE), typically the hands, towards the target position. The rest of the body then cooperates accordingly with the EE, abiding by inverse kinematics principles. One of the fundamental challenges in this domain stems from the complexity of the human body, which operates as a sophisticated multi-joint articu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the stage 1 hand motion generation framework. The framework includes serveral DiT blocks as backbone. Audio embeddings are injected via cross-attention, style and speed embeddings are added on timestep, previous motion latent sequence is concatenated on current noisy motion latent sequence for smooth transition. Hand masks that mask out invisible hands frames are directly added on noisy motion latent. Ha… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The overview of the Stage 2 video generation pipeline, which is based on the Parallel Reference Network structure. The ReferenceNet extracts visual features from both the reference image and motion frames. The MANO maps and keypoint maps generated in Stage 1 are passed through the denoising Backbone Network to guide the character’s motion. Additionally, trainable hand confidence embeddings enhance the quality of the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The distribution of the generated hand positions from co-speech gesture generation methods based on Talkshow dataset. From left to right: Ours MANO based,Ours SMPL based, Talkshow, Diffsheg. ever, they still serve as effective indicators of joint move￾ment trends. Spec…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The qualitative comparisons with pose-driven body animation methods, based on the EMTD dataset. Since CyberHost and Vlogger have not open-sourced their models, we conduct relevant comparison experiments based on demo videos retrieved from their respective homepages. As…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The qualitative comparisons with audio-driven body animation methods. References Bie, X., Guo, W., Leglaive, S., Girin, L., Moreno-Noguer, F., and Alameda-Pineda, X. Hit-dvae: Human motion generation via hierarchical transformer dynamical vae. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EchoCache: Energy-Guided Cross-Modal Caching for Efficient Audio-Driven Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Audio time-frequency energy guides which video latents get recomputed during diffusion denoising, yielding up to 2.46x faster audio-driven video generation with competitive quality.

  2. ControlHair: Synergizing Physics Simulator and Video Diffusion for Controllable Dynamic Hair Rendering

    cs.GR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ControlHair couples Blender hair simulation with a video diffusion transformer to generate photorealistic videos with controlled hair dynamics from a single reference image.

  3. OmniHuman-1.5: Instilling an Active Mind in Avatars via Cognitive Simulation

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OmniHuman-1.5 combines MLLM-based planning with a multimodal diffusion transformer and pseudo-last-frame identity conditioning to generate context-aware avatar videos from audio and a reference image.

  4. Bind-Your-Avatar: Multi-Talking-Character Video Generation with Dynamic 3D-mask-based Embedding Router

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bind-Your-Avatar generates videos of multiple co-present talking characters by using a learned 3D-mask router to bind each voice to the correct character.

  5. Let Them Talk: Audio-Driven Multi-Person Conversational Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MultiTalk is the first framework to generate multi-person conversational videos from multi-stream audio, using Label Rotary Position Embedding to bind each voice to the correct person.

  6. DanceTogether! Identity-Preserving Multi-Person Interactive Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A diffusion model fuses per-person masks with pose keypoints to generate identity-preserving, two-person interactive videos from a single reference image, outperforming prior single-person-animation pipelines.

  7. OmniHuman-1: Rethinking the Scaling-Up of One-Stage Conditioned Human Animation Models

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mixed-condition training recipe, combining text, audio, and pose signals, lets a single diffusion transformer animate photos into realistic talking or singing videos at unprecedented data scale.

  8. MIDAS: Multimodal Interactive Digital-humAn Synthesis via Real-time Autoregressive Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new autoregressive video-generation framework for interactive digital humans, with a 64x compression autoencoder and a diffusion renderer, claims real-time multimodal control but is only demonstrated for audio input.

  9. InfiniteTalk: Audio-driven Video Generation for Sparse-Frame Video Dubbing

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse-frame dubbing with adjacent-chunk keyframe sampling lets a streaming audio-video model produce full-body motion synchronized to new audio while preserving identity and camera motion.

  10. StableAvatar: Infinite-Length Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A diffusion-based avatar generator that uses a timestep-aware audio adapter, audio-adaptive guidance, and weighted sliding-window fusion to produce audio-synced talking-head videos several minutes long with reduced id...

  11. MoDA: Multi-modal Diffusion Architecture for Talking Head Generation

    cs.GR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MoDA uses flow matching in a compact face-motion space with a progressively fused multi-modal transformer to generate expressive, lip-synced talking-head videos from a single image and audio.

  12. OmniAvatar: Efficient Audio-Driven Avatar Video Generation with Adaptive Body Animation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An audio-driven avatar generator that injects Wav2Vec2 audio features as additive latents into multiple DiT layers of a LoRA-fine-tuned Wan2.1 model, improving lip-sync and enabling prompt-controlled full-body animation.

  13. AlignHuman: Improving Motion and Fidelity via Timestep-Segment Preference Optimization for Audio-Driven Human Animation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Timestep-segment preference optimization with separate motion and fidelity LoRAs improves audio-driven human animation quality and allows a 3.3x inference speedup.

  14. Wan-S2V: Audio-Driven Cinematic Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Wan-S2V is an audio-driven video generator built on Wan, claiming better cinematic character animation than prior systems, though the evaluation is limited.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 14 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

  2. [2]

    Hit-dvae: Human motion generation via hierarchical transformer dynamical vae

    Bie, X., Guo, W., Leglaive, S., Girin, L., Moreno-Noguer, F., and Alameda-Pineda, X. Hit-dvae: Human motion generation via hierarchical transformer dynamical vae. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01565, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents

    Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Becket, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S., and Stone, M. Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH '94,...

    arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    Pixart- : Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023

    Chen, J., Yu, J., Ge, C., Yao, L., Xie, E., Wu, Y., Wang, Z., Kwok, J., Luo, P., Lu, H., and Li, Z. Pixart- : Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00426

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Diffsheg: A diffusion-based approach for real-time speech-driven holistic 3d expression and gesture generation, 2024

    Chen, J., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, A., Li, Y., and Chen, Q. Diffsheg: A diffusion-based approach for real-time speech-driven holistic 3d expression and gesture generation, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04747

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Chung, J. S. and Zisserman, A. Out of time: automated lip sync in the wild. In Computer Vision--ACCV 2016 Workshops: ACCV 2016 International Workshops, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, Part II 13, pp.\ 251--263. Springer, 2017

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    G., Kolotouros, N., Alldieck, T., and Sminchisescu, C

    Corona, E., Zanfir, A., Bazavan, E. G., Kolotouros, N., Alldieck, T., and Sminchisescu, C. Vlogger: Multimodal diffusion for embodied avatar synthesis, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Hallo2: Long-duration and high-resolution audio-driven portrait image animation, 2024 a

    Cui, J., Li, H., Yao, Y., Zhu, H., Shang, H., Cheng, K., and Zhou, H. Hallo2: Long-duration and high-resolution audio-driven portrait image animation, 2024 a

    work page 2024

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Hallo3: Highly dynamic and realistic portrait image animation with diffusion transformer networks, 2024 b

    Cui, J., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Shang, H., Cheng, K., Ma, Y., Mu, S., and Zhou, H. Hallo3: Highly dynamic and realistic portrait image animation with diffusion transformer networks, 2024 b

    2024

  2. [10]

    T., and Rubinstein, M

    Ephrat, A., Mosseri, I., Lang, O., Dekel, T., Wilson, K., Hassidim, A., Freeman, W. T., and Rubinstein, M. Looking to listen at the cocktail party: A speaker-independent audio-visual model for speech separation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03619, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Faceformer: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with transformers

    Fan, Y., Lin, Z., Saito, J., Wang, W., and Komura, T. Faceformer: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning

    Guo, Y., Yang, C., Rao, A., Wang, Y., Qiao, Y., Lin, D., and Dai, B. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Learning speech-driven 3d conversational gestures from video, 2021

    Habibie, I., Xu, W., Mehta, D., Liu, L., Seidel, H.-P., Pons-Moll, G., Elgharib, M., and Theobalt, C. Learning speech-driven 3d conversational gestures from video, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06837

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion

    HaCohen, Y., Chiprut, N., Brazowski, B., Shalem, D., Moshe, D., Richardson, E., Levin, E., Shiran, G., Zabari, N., Gordon, O., Panet, P., Weissbuch, S., Kulikov, V., Bitterman, Y., Melumian, Z., and Bibi, O. Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501...

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. CoRR, abs/1512.03385, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Co-speech gesture video generation via motion-decoupled diffusion model, 2024

    He, X., Huang, Q., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Wu, Z., Yang, S., Li, M., Chen, Z., Xu, S., and Wu, X. Co-speech gesture video generation via motion-decoupled diffusion model, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01862

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium

    Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., and Hochreiter, S. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33: 0 6840--6851, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Diffted: One-shot audio-driven ted talk video generation with diffusion-based co-speech gestures

    Hogue, S., Zhang, C., Daruger, H., Tian, Y., and Guo, X. Diffted: One-shot audio-driven ted talk video generation with diffusion-based co-speech gestures. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, pp.\ 1922--1931, June 2024

    1922

  12. [20]

    and Ziou, D

    Horé, A. and Ziou, D. Image quality metrics: Psnr vs. ssim. In 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 2366--2369, 2010. doi:10.1109/ICPR.2010.579

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation

    Hu, L., Gao, X., Zhang, P., Sun, K., Zhang, B., and Bo, L. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17117, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Nmpc-mp: Real-time nonlinear model predictive control for safe motion planning in manipulator teleoperation

    Hu, S., Babaians, E., Karimi, M., and Steinbach, E. Nmpc-mp: Real-time nonlinear model predictive control for safe motion planning in manipulator teleoperation. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp.\ 8309--8316, 2021. doi:10.11...

    2021

  15. [23]

    Advmt: Adversarial motion transformer for long-term human motion prediction

    Idrees, S., Choi, J., and Sohn, S. Advmt: Adversarial motion transformer for long-term human motion prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05018, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Loopy: Taming audio-driven portrait avatar with long-term motion dependency, 2024

    Jiang, J., Liang, C., Yang, J., Lin, G., Zhong, T., and Zheng, Y. Loopy: Taming audio-driven portrait avatar with long-term motion dependency, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02634

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes . In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14-16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings , 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Gesture generation by imitation: from human behavior to computer character animation

    Kipp, M. Gesture generation by imitation: from human behavior to computer character animation. 2005. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:26271318

    2005

  19. [27]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models, 2025

    Kong, W., Tian, Q., Zhang, Z., Min, R., Dai, Z., Zhou, J., Xiong, J., Li, X., Wu, B., Zhang, J., Wu, K., Lin, Q., Yuan, J., Long, Y., Wang, A., Wang, A., Li, C., Huang, D., Yang, F., Tan, H., Wang, H., Song, J., Bai, J., Wu, J., Xue, J., Wang, J., Wang, K., Liu, M., Li, P., Li...

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Cyberhost: Taming audio-driven avatar diffusion model with region codebook attention, 2024

    Lin, G., Jiang, J., Liang, C., Zhong, T., Yang, J., and Zheng, Y. Cyberhost: Taming audio-driven avatar diffusion model with region codebook attention, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01876

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Echomimicv2: Towards striking, simplified, and semi-body human animation, 2024

    Meng, R., Zhang, X., Li, Y., and Ma, C. Echomimicv2: Towards striking, simplified, and semi-body human animation, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10061

    2024

  22. [30]

    Pavlakos, G., Choutas, V., Ghorbani, N., Bolkart, T., Osman, A. A. A., Tzionas, D., and Black, M. J. Expressive body capture: 3D hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp.\ 10975--10985, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    and Xie, S

    Peebles, W. and Xie, S. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09748, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cocogesture: Toward coherent co-speech 3d gesture generation in the wild, 2024

    Qi, X., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Pan, J., Liu, C., Li, P., Chi, X., Li, M., Xue, W., Zhang, S., Luo, W., Liu, Q., and Guo, Y. Cocogesture: Toward coherent co-speech 3d gesture generation in the wild, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16874

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al

    Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pp.\ 8748--8763. PMLR, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Relaxedik: Real-time synthesis of accurate and feasible robot arm motion

    Rakita, D., Mutlu, B., and Gleicher, M. Relaxedik: Real-time synthesis of accurate and feasible robot arm motion. In Robotics: Science and Systems, volume 14, pp.\ 26--30. Pittsburgh, PA, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.\ 10684--10695, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Romero, J., Tzionas, D., and Black, M. J. Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bodies together. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia), 36 0 (6), November 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    wav2vec: Unsupervised pre-training for speech recognition

    Schneider, S., Baevski, A., Collobert, R., and Auli, M. wav2vec: Unsupervised pre-training for speech recognition. pp.\ 3465--3469, 09 2019. doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1873

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Vote for grasp poses from noisy point sets by learning from human

    Tian, L., Wu, J., Xiong, Z., and Zhu, X. Vote for grasp poses from noisy point sets by learning from human. In 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), pp.\ 349--356. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Emo: Emote portrait alive generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions

    Tian, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, B., and Bo, L. Emo: Emote portrait alive generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 244--260. Springer, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Fvd: A new metric for video generation

    Unterthiner, T., van Steenkiste, S., Kurach, K., Marinier, R., Michalski, M., and Gelly, S. Fvd: A new metric for video generation. 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    N., Kaiser, L

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L. u., and Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (eds.), Advances in Neural Informatio...

    2017

  34. [42]

    Gesture and speech in interaction: An overview

    Wagner, P., Malisz, Z., and Kopp, S. Gesture and speech in interaction: An overview. Speech Communication, 57: 0 209--232, 2014. ISSN 0167-6393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639313001295

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., and Simoncelli, E. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13 0 (4): 0 600--612, 2004. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

    2004

  36. [44]

    Winter, D. A. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. John wiley & sons, 2009

    2009

  37. [45]

    Codetalker: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with discrete motion prior, 2023

    Xing, J., Xia, M., Zhang, Y., Cun, X., Wang, J., and Wong, T.-T. Codetalker: Speech-driven 3d facial animation with discrete motion prior, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02379

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven visual synthesis for portrait image animation, 2024

    Xu, M., Li, H., Su, Q., Shang, H., Zhang, L., and Liu, C. Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven visual synthesis for portrait image animation, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08801

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer

    Yang, Z., Teng, J., Zheng, W., Ding, M., Huang, S., Xu, J., Yang, Y., Hong, W., Zhang, X., Feng, G., et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Yi, H., Liang, H., Liu, Y., Cao, Q., Wen, Y., Bolkart, T., Tao, D., and Black, M. J. Generating holistic 3d human motion from speech. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp.\ 469--480, June 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    B., Liang, P

    Zadeh, A. B., Liang, P. P., Poria, S., Cambria, E., and Morency, L.-P. Multimodal language analysis in the wild: Cmu-mosei dataset and interpretable dynamic fusion graph. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long...

    2018

  42. [50]

    Mimicmotion: High-quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance

    Zhang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, L.-W., Wang, H., Cheng, J., Zhu, Y., and Zou, F. Mimicmotion: High-quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19680, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Taming diffusion models for audio-driven co-speech gesture generation

    Zhu, L., Liu, X., Liu, X., Qian, R., Liu, Z., and Yu, L. Taming diffusion models for audio-driven co-speech gesture generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 10544--10553, 2023 a

    2023

  44. [52]

    Tryondiffusion: A tale of two unets

    Zhu, L., Yang, D., Zhu, T., Reda, F., Chan, W., Saharia, C., Norouzi, M., and Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, I. Tryondiffusion: A tale of two unets. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 4606--4615, 2023 b

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.