REVIEW 3 cited by
Multimodal LLMs for OCR, OCR Post-Correction, and Named Entity Recognition in Historical Documents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Multimodal LLMs for OCR, OCR Post-Correction, and Named Entity Recognition in Historical Documents
read the original abstract
We explore how multimodal Large Language Models (mLLMs) can help researchers transcribe historical documents, extract relevant historical information, and construct datasets from historical sources. Specifically, we investigate the capabilities of mLLMs in performing (1) Optical Character Recognition (OCR), (2) OCR Post-Correction, and (3) Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks on a set of city directories published in German between 1754 and 1870. First, we benchmark the off-the-shelf transcription accuracy of both mLLMs and conventional OCR models. We find that the best-performing mLLM model significantly outperforms conventional state-of-the-art OCR models and other frontier mLLMs. Second, we are the first to introduce multimodal post-correction of OCR output using mLLMs. We find that this novel approach leads to a drastic improvement in transcription accuracy and consistently produces highly accurate transcriptions (<1% CER), without any image pre-processing or model fine-tuning. Third, we demonstrate that mLLMs can efficiently recognize entities in transcriptions of historical documents and parse them into structured dataset formats. Our findings provide early evidence for the long-term potential of mLLMs to introduce a paradigm shift in the approaches to historical data collection and document transcription.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
GlotOCR Bench: OCR Models Still Struggle Beyond a Handful of Unicode Scripts
GlotOCR Bench shows that OCR models perform well on fewer than 10 scripts and fail to generalize beyond about 30, with results tracking pretraining coverage and models hallucinating from known scripts on unfamiliar ones.
-
Pretraining Language Models on Historical Text
TypewriterLM is a 7.24B language model pretrained exclusively on pre-1913 English text using a 54B-token corpus, lexically grounded instruction tuning, and the History-Event benchmark for temporal consistency.
-
The Devil is in the Details -- From OCR for Old Church Slavonic to Purely Visual Stemma Reconstruction
OCR for basic letters in Old Church Slavonic can reach 2-3% error rate with modern systems, and a new image-only pipeline of glyph extraction, clustering, and pairwise comparison can produce stemmata for historical ma...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.