REVIEW 1 cited by
She Works, He Works: A Curious Exploration of Gender Bias in AI-Generated Imagery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper examines gender bias in AI-generated imagery of construction workers, highlighting discrepancies in the portrayal of male and female figures. Grounded in Griselda Pollock's theories on visual culture and gender, the analysis reveals that AI models tend to sexualize female figures while portraying male figures as more authoritative and competent. These findings underscore AI's potential to mirror and perpetuate societal biases, emphasizing the need for critical engagement with AI-generated content. The project contributes to discussions on the ethical implications of AI in creative practices and its broader impact on cultural perceptions of gender.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Framework for Critical Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models: Integrating Art Historical Analysis, Artistic Exploration, and Critical Prompt Engineering
A qualitative evaluation framework combining art historical analysis, artistic exploration, and critical prompt engineering aims to expose biases in text-to-image models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.