Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Good Seed Makes a Good Crop: Discovering Secret Seeds in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14828 v2 pith:UYUDP433 submitted 2024-05-23 cs.CV

Good Seed Makes a Good Crop: Discovering Secret Seeds in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

classification cs.CV
keywords seedsimageseeddiffusionimagesgoodinferencerandom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have facilitated creative and photorealistic image synthesis. By varying the random seeds, we can generate many images for a fixed text prompt. Technically, the seed controls the initial noise and, in multi-step diffusion inference, the noise used for reparameterization at intermediate timesteps in the reverse diffusion process. However, the specific impact of the random seed on the generated images remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we conduct a large-scale scientific study into the impact of random seeds during diffusion inference. Remarkably, we reveal that the best 'golden' seed achieved an impressive FID of 21.60, compared to the worst 'inferior' seed's FID of 31.97. Additionally, a classifier can predict the seed number used to generate an image with over 99.9% accuracy in just a few epochs, establishing that seeds are highly distinguishable based on generated images. Encouraged by these findings, we examined the influence of seeds on interpretable visual dimensions. We find that certain seeds consistently produce grayscale images, prominent sky regions, or image borders. Seeds also affect image composition, including object location, size, and depth. Moreover, by leveraging these 'golden' seeds, we demonstrate improved image generation such as high-fidelity inference and diversified sampling. Our investigation extends to inpainting tasks, where we uncover some seeds that tend to insert unwanted text artifacts. Overall, our extensive analyses highlight the importance of selecting good seeds and offer practical utility for image generation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Retrieving and Refining Winning Noise Tickets for Diffusion-Based Motion Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Certain Gaussian initial noises act as winning tickets that bias motion diffusion toward specific semantics; retrieving and KL-refining them improves text-motion alignment without retraining.

  2. The FID Lottery: Quantifying Hidden Randomness in Generative-Model Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FID variance from training seeds is 3.2 times larger than from sampling seeds on hundreds of SiT models, with 1-2% coefficient of variation that barely shrinks with more compute, leading to a multi-seed evaluation protocol.

  3. Pinterest Canvas: Large-Scale Image Generation at Pinterest

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.0

    A FLUX-style base diffusion model plus task-specific fine-tunes and product-preserving pipelines yields double-digit Pinterest ads engagement lifts and higher no-defect rates than GPT-Image, FLUX Kontext, and Nano Banana.