REVIEW 4 cited by
The quantum physics of chronology protection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This is a brief survey of the current status of Stephen Hawking's ``chronology protection conjecture''. That is: ``Why does nature abhor a time machine?'' I'll discuss a few examples of spacetimes containing ``time machines'' (closed causal curves), the sorts of peculiarities that arise, and the reactions of the physics community. While pointing out other possibilities, this article concentrates on the possibility of ``chronology protection''. As Stephen puts it: ``It seems that there is a Chronology Protection Agency which prevents the appearance of closed timelike curves and so makes the universe safe for historians.''
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Exact, non-singular black holes from a phantom DBI Field as primordial dark matter
Exact non-singular black holes from the phantom DBI field evaporate to gram-mass relics, opening a new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter.
-
Closed Timelike Curves from a Vacuum Traveling Wave
An exact vacuum solution to Einstein's equations is constructed that forms closed timelike curves from regular asymptotically flat initial data respecting energy conditions.
-
Metric affine gravity with dynamical chronology protection
A new metric-affine gravity toy model dynamically generates a global time function via projective invariance breaking to enforce stable causality, recovering mimetic gravity and yielding a broader dark sector.
-
Are Petrov type-N and D spacetimes admitting CTCs valid in $f(R,\mathcal{L}_m,\Phi,X)$ gravity?
The Ori and Ahmed CTC metrics remain exact solutions in the f(R, L_m, Φ, X) model f = R + L_m + (λ/2)X, with chronology-violating regions preserved and no enforced protection from the scalar degree of freedom.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.