Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

PCA-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in Perception-Cognition-Action Chain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.15527 v1 pith:V57FGAYE submitted 2024-02-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords mllmspca-benchmodelsmultimodalcapabilitiesmodelaccuracyautomatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present PCA-Bench, a multimodal decision-making benchmark for evaluating the integrated capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Departing from previous benchmarks focusing on simplistic tasks and individual model capability, PCA-Bench introduces three complex scenarios: autonomous driving, domestic robotics, and open-world games. Given task instructions and diverse contexts, the model is required to seamlessly integrate multiple capabilities of Perception, Cognition, and Action in a reasoning chain to make accurate decisions. Moreover, PCA-Bench features error localization capabilities, scrutinizing model inaccuracies in areas such as perception, knowledge, or reasoning. This enhances the reliability of deploying MLLMs. To balance accuracy and efficiency in evaluation, we propose PCA-Eval, an automatic evaluation protocol, and assess 10 prevalent MLLMs. The results reveal significant performance disparities between open-source models and powerful proprietary models like GPT-4 Vision. To address this, we introduce Embodied-Instruction-Evolution (EIE), an automatic framework for synthesizing instruction tuning examples in multimodal embodied environments. EIE generates 7,510 training examples in PCA-Bench and enhances the performance of open-source MLLMs, occasionally surpassing GPT-4 Vision (+3\% in decision accuracy), thereby validating the effectiveness of EIE. Our findings suggest that robust MLLMs like GPT4-Vision show promise for decision-making in embodied agents, opening new avenues for MLLM research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EOC-Bench: Can MLLMs Identify, Recall, and Forecast Objects in an Egocentric World?

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EOC-Bench evaluates MLLMs on egocentric object cognition across past, present, and future temporal dimensions, finding large gaps versus humans, especially in absolute time perception.

  2. Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new step-level reward-modeling benchmark for multimodal agents shows current MLLMs reach at most 61.6 percent accuracy, and benchmark score correlates strongly (r=0.981 across five models) with downstream A* search ...

  3. Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM planning methods, benchmarks, and interpretability work, organized around a three-way taxonomy.

Pith tools