Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Dynamic Graph Induced Contour-aware Heat Conduction Network for Event-based Object Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Event cameras emit data that concentrates on object contours, and this paper shows a detector can turn those contours into graph features that guide a heat-conduction backbone, reaching the highest reported mAP@50:95 of 53.6 on EvDET200K.

desk verdict Reasonable engineering paper with a thin SOTA claim; the contour-aware mechanism is plausible but not cleanly isolated and the reported numbers need verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12908 v1 pith:V5SFC24Z submitted 2025-05-19 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Xiao Wang , Yu Jin , Lan Chen , Bo Jiang , Lin Zhu , Yonghong Tian , Jin Tang , Bin Luo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords event-basedobjectdetectionheatconductionnetworkcontour-awarefeaturesdynamicgraphthermaldiffusivitypredictionEvDET200Kneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Event cameras emit spikes where brightness changes, and because moving objects are seen through their moving edges, those spikes pile up on object contours. This paper builds a detector, CvHeat-DET, that turns this observation into a graph: patches of the event frame become nodes, a graph-clustering step isolates dense connected subgraphs, and those subgraphs are aggregated into a compact contour graph whose features are fed into a heat-conduction backbone to predict thermal diffusivity. The central claim is that this contour guidance is what makes a heat-conduction backbone competitive on event data, yielding the highest reported results on EvDET200K (mAP@50:95 of 53.6) and better zero-shot transfer to GEN1 and DSEC than prior heat-conduction detectors. If correct, it means event-specific structure, not generic backbone design, is the main lever for accurate event-based detection.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the Contour-aware Heat Conduction Operator (CHCO), a replacement for the self-attention block in a vision backbone. Inside it, the event feature is transformed with a Discrete Cosine Transform, multiplied in the frequency domain by a thermal decay factor $e^{-k\omega^2 t}$, and transformed back, with the thermal diffusivity $k$ predicted from graph features rather than set as a constant. A parallel Dynamic Graph Network constructs the graph scales: a global graph from image patches with distance-based edges, connected subgraphs from the Louvain algorithm filtered by a node-count threshold to keep contour-like clusters, and a contour graph formed by aggregating each subgraph into one node and reconnecting nodes with K-nearest-neighbor edges. GCNs extract features from each scale; these features predict $k$ and are concatenated into the heat-conduction features, and a second heat-conduction pass uses a $k$ predicted from the contour features so heat is confined around object boundaries. An IoU-based query selection, trained with a Varifocal-style loss, selects the decoder queries. This mechanism is what converts the event stream's contour density into learned diffusion behavior.

What would settle it

Annotate contour masks on EvDET200K or a similar event dataset and measure the overlap between the graph's filtered subgraphs and those masks; if the average precision or recall of contour coverage is near chance in scenes with textured object interiors, the contour-guidance mechanism loses its basis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that object contours in event streams can be recovered from event density and used to set the thermal diffusivity coefficients inside a heat-conduction operator, so that heat is guided along object boundaries rather than spreading uniformly. The detector, CvHeat-DET, fuses three scales of graph features—a global patch graph, connected subgraphs, and a compact contour graph—into a four-stage heat-conduction backbone, then applies IoU-based query selection before the detection head. On EvDET200K it reports the highest published mAP@50:95 (53.6), mAP@50 (80.9), and mAP@75 (56.9); its component analysis credits the contour graph with a 2.9-point gain and multi-scale graph fusion with an additional 0.4 points over the vHeat-plus-IoU-query-selection baseline. Trained on EvDET200K, it also transfers to GEN1 (25.5 mAP) and DSEC (12.4 mAP) better than vHeat and MvHeat-DET.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that object contours in event streams can be recovered from event density alone, so that subgraphs of an event-driven graph that pass a size threshold truly trace object boundaries rather than textured interiors or clutter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On EvDET200K, CvHeat-DET reports mAP@50:95 of 53.6, mAP@50 of 80.9, and mAP@75 of 56.9, ahead of the vHeat baseline (50.3) and MvHeat-DET (52.9) and of transformer detectors such as Swin-T (49.0) and DETR (40.9).
  • The component analysis credits the graph branch: adding the contour graph to the vHeat plus IoU-query-selection baseline raises mAP from 50.3 to 53.2, and multi-scale graph fusion adds 0.4 more.
  • Training on EvDET200K transfers without fine-tuning to GEN1 (25.5 mAP) and DSEC (12.4 mAP), exceeding the vHeat (24.5 / 11.6) and MvHeat-DET (25.3 / 11.2) baselines.
  • Event frames are the recommended input: frames reach 53.6 mAP at 98.8G FLOPs, while voxels give 52.7 mAP at 143.5G FLOPs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: the gain should depend on how cleanly event density tracks object contours, so a test that replaces the contour graph with random clusters of the same size and measures the mAP drop would isolate how much of the 3.3-point gain over the vHeat-plus-IoU-query-selection baseline is genuinely contour semantics.
  • A practical next step would be to make graph construction incremental or asynchronous, updating the contour graph only where new events arrive; the paper notes the online construction is what drops inference speed to 11 FPS, so this could recover real-time use.
  • The same contour-graph branch could be paired with temporal event representations such as voxels or time surfaces instead of per-frame graphs; the paper compares input formats but does not vary how the graph is built from them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CvHeat-DET, an event-based object detector built on a heat-conduction backbone. The key idea is to construct a dynamic graph from event frames: a global patch-based graph, connected subgraphs obtained by Louvain community detection, and a compressed contour graph obtained by aggregating subgraphs and reconnecting them with KNN. Graph features from these three scales are fused into contour-aware heat conduction operators (CHCO), where they predict thermal diffusivity coefficients and inject multi-scale structural information. An IoU-based query selection (IQS) module is also introduced. Experiments are reported on EvDET200K, GEN1, and DSEC. On EvDET200K the method reaches 53.6 mAP@50:95, compared with 52.9 for MvHeat-DET, and the paper claims SOTA performance. Component analyses and ablations over graph types, input formats, resolution, and network depth are provided, plus generalization results and visualization.

Significance. If the reported results are reproducible, the paper would make a useful contribution: it is, to my knowledge, a novel combination of graph-structured event modeling with a heat-conduction backbone, and it is evaluated on three benchmarks including the new EvDET200K dataset. The component analysis and the explicit limitation statement are commendable. However, the significance is tempered by three issues: the SOTA margin is thin (0.7 mAP) and is reported from a single run; the code and hyperparameters are not provided; and the ablation evidence does not clearly isolate the proposed contour-aware mechanism as the source of the gain. The paper also shows a large inference-speed penalty (11 FPS vs. 58 FPS for MvHeat-DET), which weakens the claimed accuracy-efficiency balance.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.5, Table 5] The ablation does not support the central claim that the contour-aware graph is the source of the improvement. Index 4 (Baseline + Contour Graph only) achieves 52.8 mAP, which is lower than Index 3 (Baseline + Connected Subgraphs only) at 53.0, and only the combination of all three graph scales with IQS reaches 53.6. Since the Contour Graph is defined as an aggregated and further-compressed version of the Connected Subgraphs, the table suggests that the contour graph alone is not beneficial; the gain may come from the multi-scale concatenation or from IQS. The authors should add an ablation that isolates contour-awareness, for example by replacing the contour graph with a same-size random graph or by ablating IQS separately in the full model, and should report the mAP of the full model without IQS.
  2. [§4.3, Table 1; §4.2] The claimed 'clear margin' of 0.7 mAP over MvHeat-DET (53.6 vs. 52.9) is not accompanied by any measure of variance. No seeds are reported, no error bars are given, and the graph construction uses the stochastic Louvain algorithm, so the reported single-run numbers may be within run-to-run noise. The source code is announced but not available, and key hyperparameters (distance threshold R_d, node threshold R_n, K in KNN, patch size, GCN configuration) are not specified in the text. To substantiate the SOTA claim, the authors should release the code, provide the values of all free parameters, run each configuration multiple times with different seeds, and report mean and standard deviation.
  3. [§4.5, Tables 4, 7, 8] The FLOPs numbers are internally inconsistent, which undermines the efficiency claims. In the text of Section 4.5 the event-voxel configuration is described as incurring 176.5G FLOPs, while Table 4 lists 143.5G for the same row. More seriously, the default 640x640 configuration with (2,2,12,2) CHCO layers is reported as 98.8G in Table 1 and Table 8, but Table 7 reports 67.7G for the same resolution and depth. The authors should state precisely how FLOPs are measured (input resolution, whether the graph branch is included, etc.) and ensure the tables are consistent.
  4. [§3.3, 'Connected Subgraphs Construction'] The load-bearing assumption of the method is that event density is high at object contours and low in the background and object interiors, so that Louvain subgraphs with at least R_n nodes correspond to object boundaries. This assumption is cited from [56] but is never validated on the datasets used here. Without evidence that the constructed subgraphs actually align with object contours, the semantic meaning of 'contour graph' remains unclear. The authors should provide quantitative validation, such as the overlap between graph nodes/subgraphs and ground-truth object boxes or contour maps, or at least qualitative examples showing graph structures overlaid on event frames.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The paper repeatedly claims a 'good balance between accuracy and efficiency', but Table 1 shows CvHeat-DET at 11 FPS versus 58 FPS for MvHeat-DET. Please qualify this claim or discuss the speed-accuracy trade-off more explicitly.
  2. [§4.3, Table 2] The generalization claim is slightly overstated: on GEN1, CvHeat-DET has higher mAP@50:95 than MvHeat-DET (25.5 vs. 25.3) but lower mAP@50 (52.1 vs. 52.3). Please describe the generalization results with this nuance.
  3. [§4.5, Table 6] The row 'Predicting k using FEs' is the adopted setting, but the text does not explain what the frequency embeddings are or how the prediction network is implemented. Please add a short description or a reference to a figure.
  4. [§4.6, Figure 4 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'DERT' should be 'DETR'.
  5. [§4.5, Table 8 caption] The caption says 'MHCO Number' but the method is CHCO; please correct the terminology.
  6. [References, Table 1 entry 01] The table cites Faster R-CNN as [14], but reference [14] is Girshick's Fast R-CNN; the citation appears mismatched. Please verify the reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SOTA claim is an external-benchmark result with ordinary baseline comparisons.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical accuracy result on the EvDET200K benchmark, with additional generalization evaluations on GEN1 and DSEC. The proposed CvHeat-DET builds on the heat conduction operator from vHeat and on the event-based MvHeat-DET framework; both are prior works that are explicitly included as baselines in the comparison tables rather than being assumed to imply the reported numbers. The thermal-diffusivity prediction, graph construction, and IoU-based query selection are presented as trainable components whose contributions are tested by ablations, and the equations in the paper do not define the predicted mAP in terms of any fitted parameter or self-cited result. The self-citations that appear, notably MvHeat-DET, are used as a comparison baseline and as prior context, which is normal practice and is not load-bearing for the central claim. The explicitly stated limitation in Section 4.7 concerns training/inference speed and lack of temporal modeling; it is an honest scope statement rather than evidence of circularity. No derivation step was found that reduces, by the paper's own equations or by a self-citation chain, to its own inputs. The appropriate finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical gain rests on several hand-chosen graph thresholds and the unverified assumption that event density marks contours. These are not grounded in independent contour measurements, but the paper tests the overall architecture on external benchmarks.

free parameters (5)
  • Distance threshold R_d = not reported
    Used to create edges in the global graph; set by hand and not specified in the paper.
  • Node threshold R_n = not reported
    Determines which Louvain subgraphs are kept as contour candidates; set by hand and not specified.
  • K in K-nearest neighbors = not reported
    Controls connectivity of the contour graph; set by hand and not specified.
  • Patch size for graph nodes = not reported
    Determines graph granularity; the paper says 'fixed size' but does not give the value.
  • CHCO layer counts per stage = (2,2,12,2)
    Chosen from an ablation over (2,2,6,2), (2,2,18,2), (2,2,24,2) based on accuracy/compute tradeoff.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math The frequency-domain heat conduction formula e^{-k w^2 t} with DCT/IDCT is a valid feature transformation for vision.
    Adopted from vHeat [54] and used as the backbone operator; its validity for vision is assumed, not re-derived.
  • domain assumption Event density correlates with object contours.
    Section 3.3 assumes dense event regions correspond to contours, citing [56]; the graph construction relies on this without ground-truth contour supervision.
  • domain assumption Louvain community structure on event-density graphs aligns with object boundaries.
    The paper assumes that connected subgraphs found by Louvain correspond to objects or object parts, so filtering by node count yields contour candidates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamic Graph Induced Contour-aware Heat Conduction Network for Event-based Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V5SFC24Z

@misc{pith2026250512908,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamic Graph Induced Contour-aware Heat Conduction Network for Event-based Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V5SFC24Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12908}
}
read the original abstract

Event-based Vision Sensors (EVS) have demonstrated significant advantages over traditional RGB frame-based cameras in low-light conditions, high-speed motion capture, and low latency. Consequently, object detection based on EVS has attracted increasing attention from researchers. Current event stream object detection algorithms are typically built upon Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) or Transformers, which either capture limited local features using convolutional filters or incur high computational costs due to the utilization of self-attention. Recently proposed vision heat conduction backbone networks have shown a good balance between efficiency and accuracy; however, these models are not specifically designed for event stream data. They exhibit weak capability in modeling object contour information and fail to exploit the benefits of multi-scale features. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel dynamic graph induced contour-aware heat conduction network for event stream based object detection, termed CvHeat-DET. The proposed model effectively leverages the clear contour information inherent in event streams to predict the thermal diffusivity coefficients within the heat conduction model, and integrates hierarchical structural graph features to enhance feature learning across multiple scales. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets for event stream-based object detection fully validated the effectiveness of the proposed model. The source code of this paper will be released on https://github.com/Event-AHU/OpenEvDET.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12908 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a). Architectures of Self-Attention, Vanilla Heat Conduction Operator (HCO), and our proposed Contour-aware Heat Conduction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An overview of our proposed event-based object detection framework, termed CvHeat-DET. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visualization of the feature maps compared with other detectors. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of the detection results of ours and other detectors. (MC: misclassification, UD: undetected, OD: over-detected, LD: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ESTR-CoT: Towards Explainable and Accurate Event Stream based Scene Text Recognition with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An event-stream scene text recognizer trained with LLM-generated chain-of-thought rationales improves BLEU-1 on EventSTR from 0.638 to 0.648 and accuracy on WordArt* and IC15* by about half a point.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [56]

    Egsst: Event- based graph spatiotemporal sensitive transformer for object detection

    Sheng Wu, Hang Sheng, Hui Feng, and Bo Hu. Egsst: Event- based graph spatiotemporal sensitive transformer for object detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 37:120526–120548, 2024. 5

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

    Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10):P10008, 2008. 5

    work page 2008

  3. [2]

    Toward attribute- controlled fashion image captioning

    Chen Cai, Kim-Hui Yap, and Suchen Wang. Toward attribute- controlled fashion image captioning. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 20(9):1–18, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  4. [3]

    Embracing events and frames with hierarchical feature refinement network for object detection

    Hu Cao, Zehua Zhang, Yan Xia, Xinyi Li, Jiahao Xia, Guang Chen, and Alois Knoll. Embracing events and frames with hierarchical feature refinement network for object detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 161–177. Springer, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    Spiking neu- ral network as adaptive event stream slicer

    Jiahang Cao, Mingyuan Sun, Ziqing Wang, Hao Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Shibo Zhou, and Renjing Xu. Spiking neu- ral network as adaptive event stream slicer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02249, 2024. 4

    arXiv 2024

  6. [5]

    End- to-end object detection with transformers

    Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End- to-end object detection with transformers. In European con- ference on computer vision, pages 213–229. Springer, 2020. 6

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    Relation matters: Foreground-aware graph-based relational reasoning for domain adaptive object detection

    Chaoqi Chen, Jiongcheng Li, Hong-Yu Zhou, Xiaoguang Han, Yue Huang, Xinghao Ding, and Yizhou Yu. Relation matters: Foreground-aware graph-based relational reasoning for domain adaptive object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(3):3677–3694,

    work page

  8. [7]

    Velora: A low-rank adaptation approach for efficient rgb-event based recognition

    Lan Chen, Haoxiang Yang, Pengpeng Shao, Haoyu Song, Xiao Wang, Zhicheng Zhao, Yaowei Wang, and Yonghong Tian. Velora: A low-rank adaptation approach for efficient rgb-event based recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20064, 2024. 1

    arXiv 2024

Show all 68 references
  1. [8]

    Sutrack: Towards simple and unified single object tracking

    Xin Chen, Ben Kang, Wanting Geng, Jiawen Zhu, Yi Liu, Dong Wang, and Huchuan Lu. Sutrack: Towards simple and unified single object tracking. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2239–2247, 2025. 1

    2025

  2. [9]

    Ev-3dod: Pushing the temporal boundaries of 3d object detection with event cameras

    Hoonhee Cho, Jae-young Kang, Youngho Kim, and Kuk- Jin Yoon. Ev-3dod: Pushing the temporal boundaries of 3d object detection with event cameras. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19630, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Nearest neighbor pattern classification

    Thomas Cover and Peter Hart. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory, 13 (1):21–27, 1967. 5

    1967

  4. [11]

    Event-based vision: A survey

    Guillermo Gallego, Tobi Delbrück, Garrick Orchard, Chiara Bartolozzi, Brian Taba, Andrea Censi, Stefan Leutenegger, Andrew J Davison, Jörg Conradt, Kostas Daniilidis, et al. Event-based vision: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(1):154...

    2020

  5. [12]

    Low-latency automo- tive vision with event cameras.Nature, 629(8014):1034–1040,

    Daniel Gehrig and Davide Scaramuzza. Low-latency automo- tive vision with event cameras.Nature, 629(8014):1034–1040,

  6. [13]

    Recurrent vision transformers for object detection with event cameras

    Mathias Gehrig and Davide Scaramuzza. Recurrent vision transformers for object detection with event cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13884–13893, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 6

    2023

  7. [14]

    Fast r-cnn

    Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 1440–1448,

  8. [15]

    Spatio-temporal aggregation transformer for object detection with neuromorphic vision sensors

    Zhaoxuan Guo, Jiandong Gao, Guangyuan Ma, and Jiang- tao Xu. Spatio-temporal aggregation transformer for object detection with neuromorphic vision sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024

  9. [16]

    Mask r-cnn

    Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Gir- shick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2961–2969, 2017. 6

    2017

  10. [17]

    Cm-sc: Cross- modal spatial-channel attention network for image captioning

    Md Shamim Hossain, Shamima Aktar, Mohammad Alamgir Hossain, Naijie Gu, and Zhangjin Huang. Cm-sc: Cross- modal spatial-channel attention network for image captioning. Displays, 87:102941, 2025. 1

    2025

  11. [18]

    Class-wise dynamic graph convolution for se- mantic segmentation

    Hanzhe Hu, Deyi Ji, Weihao Gan, Shuai Bai, Wei Wu, and Junjie Yan. Class-wise dynamic graph convolution for se- mantic segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1–17. Springer, 2020. 3

    2020

  12. [19]

    Exploiting multimodal spatial-temporal patterns for video object tracking

    Xiantao Hu, Ying Tai, Xu Zhao, Chen Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Jun Li, Bineng Zhong, and Jian Yang. Exploiting multimodal spatial-temporal patterns for video object tracking. In Pro- ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 3581–3589, 2025. 1

    2025

  13. [20]

    Enhancing scene graph generation with hierarchical relationships and commonsense knowledge

    Bowen Jiang, Zhijun Zhuang, Shreyas S Shivakumar, and Camillo J Taylor. Enhancing scene graph generation with hierarchical relationships and commonsense knowledge. In 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Com- puter Vision (WACV), pages 8883–8894. IEEE, 2025. 1

    2025

  14. [21]

    Spiking-yolo: spiking neural network for energy- efficient object detection

    Seijoon Kim, Seongsik Park, Byunggook Na, and Sungroh Yoon. Spiking-yolo: spiking neural network for energy- efficient object detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI con- ference on artificial intelligence, pages 11270–11277, 2020. 3

    2020

  15. [22]

    The hungarian method for the assignment problem

    Harold W Kuhn. The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval research logistics quarterly, 2(1-2):83–97,

  16. [23]

    Neural message passing for multi-label classification

    Jack Lanchantin, Arshdeep Sekhon, and Yanjun Qi. Neural message passing for multi-label classification. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Euro- pean Conference, ECML PKDD 2019, Würzburg, Germany, September 16–20, 2019, Proceedings, Part II, pages 138–16...

    2019

  17. [24]

    Yolov6: A single-stage object detec- tion framework for industrial applications

    Chuyi Li, Lulu Li, Hongliang Jiang, Kaiheng Weng, Yifei Geng, Liang Li, Zaidan Ke, Qingyuan Li, Meng Cheng, Weiqiang Nie, et al. Yolov6: A single-stage object detec- tion framework for industrial applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02976, 2022. 6

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Hdi-former: Hybrid dynamic interaction 10 ann-snn transformer for object detection using frames and events

    Dianze Li, Jianing Li, Xu Liu, Zhaokun Zhou, Xiaopeng Fan, and Yonghong Tian. Hdi-former: Hybrid dynamic interaction 10 ann-snn transformer for object detection using frames and events. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18658, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  19. [26]

    M3ixup: A multi-modal data augmentation approach for image captioning

    Yinan Li, Jiayi Ji, Xiaoshuai Sun, Yiyi Zhou, Yunpeng Luo, and Rongrong Ji. M3ixup: A multi-modal data augmentation approach for image captioning. Pattern Recognition, 158: 110941, 2025. 1

    2025

  20. [27]

    Focal loss for dense object detection

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Dollár. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2980–2988, 2017. 6

    2017

  21. [28]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021. 6

    2021

  22. [29]

    Relation-specific feature augmentation for unbiased scene graph generation

    Zhihong Liu, Jianji Wang, Hui Chen, Yongqiang Ma, and Nanning Zheng. Relation-specific feature augmentation for unbiased scene graph generation. Pattern Recognition, 157: 110936, 2025. 1

    2025

  23. [30]

    Flexevent: Event cam- era object detection at arbitrary frequencies

    Dongyue Lu, Lingdong Kong, Gim Hee Lee, Camille Si- mon Chane, and Wei Tsang Ooi. Flexevent: Event cam- era object detection at arbitrary frequencies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06708, 2024. 2

    2024

  24. [31]

    Integer-valued training and spike-driven inference spiking neural network for high-performance and energy-efficient ob- ject detection

    Xinhao Luo, Man Yao, Yuhong Chou, Bo Xu, and Guoqi Li. Integer-valued training and spike-driven inference spiking neural network for high-performance and energy-efficient ob- ject detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 253–272. Springer, 2024. 1, 3, 6

    2024

  25. [32]

    Modular graph transformer networks for multi-label image classifica- tion

    Hoang D Nguyen, Xuan-Son Vu, and Duc-Trong Le. Modular graph transformer networks for multi-label image classifica- tion. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 9092–9100, 2021. 3

    2021

  26. [33]

    Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library

    A Paszke. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01703, 2019. 6

    1912 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Get: Group event transformer for event-based vision

    Yansong Peng, Yueyi Zhang, Zhiwei Xiong, Xiaoyan Sun, and Feng Wu. Get: Group event transformer for event-based vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 6038–6048, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  28. [35]

    Scene adaptive sparse transformer for event-based object detection

    Yansong Peng, Hebei Li, Yueyi Zhang, Xiaoyan Sun, and Feng Wu. Scene adaptive sparse transformer for event-based object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16794– 16804, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024

  29. [36]

    Learning to detect objects with a 1 megapixel event camera

    Etienne Perot, Pierre De Tournemire, Davide Nitti, Jonathan Masci, and Amos Sironi. Learning to detect objects with a 1 megapixel event camera. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:16639–16652, 2020. 6

    2020

  30. [37]

    Detectors: Detecting objects with recursive feature pyramid and switch- able atrous convolution

    Siyuan Qiao, Liang-Chieh Chen, and Alan Yuille. Detectors: Detecting objects with recursive feature pyramid and switch- able atrous convolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10213–10224, 2021. 6

    2021

  31. [38]

    Aegnn: Asynchronous event-based graph neural networks

    Simon Schaefer, Daniel Gehrig, and Davide Scaramuzza. Aegnn: Asynchronous event-based graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12371–12381, 2022. 3

    2022

  32. [39]

    Mamba adapter: Efficient multi- modal fusion for vision-language tracking.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    Liangtao Shi, Bineng Zhong, Qihua Liang, Xiantao Hu, Zhiyi Mo, and Shuxiang Song. Mamba adapter: Efficient multi- modal fusion for vision-language tracking.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025. 1

    2025

  33. [40]

    Deep directly-trained spiking neural networks for object detection

    Qiaoyi Su, Yuhong Chou, Yifan Hu, Jianing Li, Shijie Mei, Ziyang Zhang, and Guoqiu Li. Deep directly-trained spiking neural networks for object detection. 2023 ieee. In CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 6532–6542, 2023. 1, 3, 6

    2023

  34. [41]

    Revisiting color-event based tracking: A unified network, dataset, and metric

    Chuanming Tang, Xiao Wang, Ju Huang, Bo Jiang, Lin Zhu, Jianlin Zhang, Yaowei Wang, and Yonghong Tian. Revisiting color-event based tracking: A unified network, dataset, and metric. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11010, 2022. 1

    2022 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Re- mote sensing scene graph generation for improved retrieval based on spatial relationships

    Jiayi Tang, Xiaochong Tong, Chunping Qiu, Yuekun Sun, Haoshuai Song, Yaxian Lei, Yi Lei, and Congzhou Guo. Re- mote sensing scene graph generation for improved retrieval based on spatial relationships. ISPRS Journal of Photogram- metry and Remote Sensing, 220:741–752, 2025. 1

    2025

  36. [43]

    Evrt-detr: The surprising effectiveness of detr-based detection for event cameras

    Dmitrii Torbunov, Yihui Ren, Animesh Ghose, Odera Dim, and Yonggang Cui. Evrt-detr: The surprising effectiveness of detr-based detection for event cameras. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02890, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detec- tion

    Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, Kai Chen, Zijia Lin, Jungong Han, et al. Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detec- tion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:107984–108011, 2024. 6

    2024

  38. [45]

    Dual memory aggregation network for event-based object detection with learnable representation

    Dongsheng Wang, Xu Jia, Yang Zhang, Xinyu Zhang, Yaoyuan Wang, Ziyang Zhang, Dong Wang, and Huchuan Lu. Dual memory aggregation network for event-based object detection with learnable representation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2492–2500,

  39. [46]

    Omnitracker: Uni- fying visual object tracking by tracking-with-detection

    Junke Wang, Zuxuan Wu, Dongdong Chen, Chong Luo, Xiyang Dai, Lu Yuan, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Omnitracker: Uni- fying visual object tracking by tracking-with-detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,

  40. [47]

    Sstformer: Bridging spiking neural network and memory support transformer for frame- event based recognition

    Xiao Wang, Zongzhen Wu, Yao Rong, Lin Zhu, Bo Jiang, Jin Tang, and Yonghong Tian. Sstformer: Bridging spiking neural network and memory support transformer for frame- event based recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04369,

    arXiv

  41. [48]

    Long-term frame-event visual tracking: Benchmark dataset and baseline

    Xiao Wang, Ju Huang, Shiao Wang, Chuanming Tang, Bo Jiang, Yonghong Tian, Jin Tang, and Bin Luo. Long-term frame-event visual tracking: Benchmark dataset and baseline. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05839, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Object detection using event camera: A moe heat conduction based detector and a new benchmark dataset

    Xiao Wang, Yu Jin, Wentao Wu, Wei Zhang, Lin Zhu, Bo Jiang, and Yonghong Tian. Object detection using event camera: A moe heat conduction based detector and a new benchmark dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06647, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 6

    2024 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Event stream based sign language translation: A high-definition benchmark dataset and a new algorithm

    Xiao Wang, Yao Rong, Fuling Wang, Jianing Li, Lin Zhu, Bo Jiang, and Yaowei Wang. Event stream based sign language translation: A high-definition benchmark dataset and a new algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10488, 2024. 1

    2024

  44. [51]

    Event stream-based 11 visual object tracking: A high-resolution benchmark dataset and a novel baseline

    Xiao Wang, Shiao Wang, Chuanming Tang, Lin Zhu, Bo Jiang, Yonghong Tian, and Jin Tang. Event stream-based 11 visual object tracking: A high-resolution benchmark dataset and a novel baseline. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition...

    2024

  45. [52]

    Mambaevt: Event stream based vi- sual object tracking using state space model

    Xiao Wang, Shiao Wang, Xixi Wang, Zhicheng Zhao, Lin Zhu, Bo Jiang, et al. Mambaevt: Event stream based vi- sual object tracking using state space model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10487, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Sign language translation using frame and event stream: Benchmark dataset and algorithms

    Xiao Wang, Yuehang Li, Fuling Wang, Bo Jiang, Yaowei Wang, Yonghong Tian, Jin Tang, and Bin Luo. Sign language translation using frame and event stream: Benchmark dataset and algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06484, 2025. 1

    2025 arXiv

  47. [54]

    vheat: Build- ing vision models upon heat conduction

    Zhaozhi Wang, Yue Liu, Yunfan Liu, Hongtian Yu, Yaowei Wang, Qixiang Ye, and Yunjie Tian. vheat: Build- ing vision models upon heat conduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16555, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    In- dvissgg: Vlm-based scene graph generation for industrial spatial intelligence

    Zuoxu Wang, Zhijie Yan, Shufei Li, and Jihong Liu. In- dvissgg: Vlm-based scene graph generation for industrial spatial intelligence. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 65: 103107, 2025. 1

    2025

  49. [57]

    Adahgnn: Adaptive hypergraph neural networks for multi-label image classification

    Xiangping Wu, Qingcai Chen, Wei Li, Yulun Xiao, and Bao- tian Hu. Adahgnn: Adaptive hypergraph neural networks for multi-label image classification. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, pages 284–293,

  50. [58]

    Bidirectional graph reasoning network for panoptic segmentation

    Yangxin Wu, Gengwei Zhang, Yiming Gao, Xiajun Deng, Ke Gong, Xiaodan Liang, and Liang Lin. Bidirectional graph reasoning network for panoptic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9080–9089, 2020. 3

    2020

  51. [59]

    Attention-driven dynamic graph convolutional network for multi-label image recognition

    Jin Ye, Junjun He, Xiaojiang Peng, Wenhao Wu, and Yu Qiao. Attention-driven dynamic graph convolutional network for multi-label image recognition. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23– 28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXI 16, pages 649–665....

    2020

  52. [60]

    Learning bottle- neck transformer for event image-voxel feature fusion based classification

    Chengguo Yuan, Yu Jin, Zongzhen Wu, Fanting Wei, Yangzirui Wang, Lan Chen, and Xiao Wang. Learning bottle- neck transformer for event image-voxel feature fusion based classification. In Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision (PRCV), pages 3–15. Springer, 2023. 1

    2023

  53. [61]

    Affinity attention graph neural network for weakly supervised semantic segmentation

    Bingfeng Zhang, Jimin Xiao, Jianbo Jiao, Yunchao Wei, and Yao Zhao. Affinity attention graph neural network for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pat- tern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(11):8082–8096,

  54. [62]

    Pyramid graph networks with connection attentions for region-based one-shot semantic seg- mentation

    Chi Zhang, Guosheng Lin, Fayao Liu, Jiushuang Guo, Qingyao Wu, and Rui Yao. Pyramid graph networks with connection attentions for region-based one-shot semantic seg- mentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9587–9595, 2019. 3

    2019

  55. [63]

    Varifocalnet: An iou-aware dense object detector

    Haoyang Zhang, Ying Wang, Feras Dayoub, and Niko Sun- derhauf. Varifocalnet: An iou-aware dense object detector. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8514–8523, 2021. 6

    2021

  56. [64]

    Dual graph convolutional network for semantic segmentation

    Li Zhang, Xiangtai Li, Anurag Arnab, Kuiyuan Yang, Yunhai Tong, and Philip HS Torr. Dual graph convolutional network for semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06121,

    1909 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Graphfpn: Graph feature pyramid network for object detection

    Gangming Zhao, Weifeng Ge, and Yizhou Yu. Graphfpn: Graph feature pyramid network for object detection. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on com- puter vision, pages 2763–2772, 2021. 3

    2021

  58. [66]

    Transformer-based dual relation graph for multi-label image recognition

    Jiawei Zhao, Ke Yan, Yifan Zhao, Xiaowei Guo, Feiyue Huang, and Jia Li. Transformer-based dual relation graph for multi-label image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 163–172, 2021. 3

    2021

  59. [67]

    Detrs beat yolos on real-time object detection

    Yian Zhao, Wenyu Lv, Shangliang Xu, Jinman Wei, Guanzhong Wang, Qingqing Dang, Yi Liu, and Jie Chen. Detrs beat yolos on real-time object detection. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16965–16974, 2024. 6

    2024

  60. [68]

    State space models for event cameras

    Nikola Zubic, Mathias Gehrig, and Davide Scaramuzza. State space models for event cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5819–5828, 2024. 6 12

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.