Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.10983 v3 pith:V5TGOCRY submitted 2021-11-22 cs.LG cs.ITmath.IT

A Semi-Supervised Adaptive Discriminative Discretization Method Improving Discrimination Power of Regularized Naive Bayes

classification cs.LG cs.ITmath.IT
keywords bayesdatadiscretizationnaivediscriminationadaptivediscriminativepower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, many improved naive Bayes methods have been developed with enhanced discrimination capabilities. Among them, regularized naive Bayes (RNB) produces excellent performance by balancing the discrimination power and generalization capability. Data discretization is important in naive Bayes. By grouping similar values into one interval, the data distribution could be better estimated. However, existing methods including RNB often discretize the data into too few intervals, which may result in a significant information loss. To address this problem, we propose a semi-supervised adaptive discriminative discretization framework for naive Bayes, which could better estimate the data distribution by utilizing both labeled data and unlabeled data through pseudo-labeling techniques. The proposed method also significantly reduces the information loss during discretization by utilizing an adaptive discriminative discretization scheme, and hence greatly improves the discrimination power of classifiers. The proposed RNB+, i.e., regularized naive Bayes utilizing the proposed discretization framework, is systematically evaluated on a wide range of machine-learning datasets. It significantly and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art NB classifiers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.