Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Search for the Gravitational-wave Background from Cosmic Strings with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Second Data Release

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.07194 v1 pith:V6OF75ZY submitted 2022-05-15 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords cosmicsearchstringarraybackgroundbounddatagravitational-wave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We perform a direct search for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) produced by cosmic strings in the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array second data release. We find no evidence for such an SGWB, and therefore place $95\%$ confidence level upper limits on the cosmic string tension, $G\mu$, as a function of the reconnection probability, $p$, which can be less than 1 in the string-theory-inspired models. The upper bound on the cosmic string tension is $G\mu \lesssim 5.1 \times 10^{-10}$ for $p = 1$, which is about five orders of magnitude tighter than the bound derived from the null search of individual gravitational wave burst from cosmic string cusps in the PPTA DR2.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pre-Big-Bang Cosmology Cannot Explain NANOGrav 15-year Signal

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Pre-Big Bang string cosmology cannot explain the NANOGrav 15-year signal; a power-law spectrum is preferred by a Bayes factor of about 468.

Pith tools