Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.03803 v2 pith:V7JL62B2 submitted 2018-06-11 cs.LG cs.ITmath.ITmath.PRstat.ML

Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Bounds

classification cs.LG cs.ITmath.ITmath.PRstat.ML
keywords chaininggeneralizationinformationmutualboundhypotheseslearningalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Bounding the generalization error of learning algorithms has a long history, which yet falls short in explaining various generalization successes including those of deep learning. Two important difficulties are (i) exploiting the dependencies between the hypotheses, (ii) exploiting the dependence between the algorithm's input and output. Progress on the first point was made with the chaining method, originating from the work of Kolmogorov, and used in the VC-dimension bound. More recently, progress on the second point was made with the mutual information method by Russo and Zou '15. Yet, these two methods are currently disjoint. In this paper, we introduce a technique to combine the chaining and mutual information methods, to obtain a generalization bound that is both algorithm-dependent and that exploits the dependencies between the hypotheses. We provide an example in which our bound significantly outperforms both the chaining and the mutual information bounds. As a corollary, we tighten Dudley's inequality when the learning algorithm chooses its output from a small subset of hypotheses with high probability.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Benign Overfitting Does Not Occur in Diffusion Models

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Benign overfitting and double descent do not occur in diffusion models: population and empirical score-matching losses cannot both be small without exponentially many samples.