Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding Optimization of Deep Learning via Jacobian Matrix and Lipschitz Constant

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.09338 v3 pith:VAPL6FWI submitted 2023-06-15 cs.LG cs.CVmath.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVmath.OCstat.ML
keywords optimizationlearningarticledeepgradientlipschitzmethodsnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This article provides a comprehensive understanding of optimization in deep learning, with a primary focus on the challenges of gradient vanishing and gradient exploding, which normally lead to diminished model representational ability and training instability, respectively. We analyze these two challenges through several strategic measures, including the improvement of gradient flow and the imposition of constraints on a network's Lipschitz constant. To help understand the current optimization methodologies, we categorize them into two classes: explicit optimization and implicit optimization. Explicit optimization methods involve direct manipulation of optimizer parameters, including weight, gradient, learning rate, and weight decay. Implicit optimization methods, by contrast, focus on improving the overall landscape of a network by enhancing its modules, such as residual shortcuts, normalization methods, attention mechanisms, and activations. In this article, we provide an in-depth analysis of these two optimization classes and undertake a thorough examination of the Jacobian matrices and the Lipschitz constants of many widely used deep learning modules, highlighting existing issues as well as potential improvements. Moreover, we also conduct a series of analytical experiments to substantiate our theoretical discussions. This article does not aim to propose a new optimizer or network. Rather, our intention is to present a comprehensive understanding of optimization in deep learning. We hope that this article will assist readers in gaining a deeper insight in this field and encourages the development of more robust, efficient, and high-performing models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Taming Transformer Without Using Learning Rate Warmup

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A spectral-norm ratio rule on the optimizer shrinks per-layer learning rates when weight updates are too large, letting Transformers train without warmup.

  2. A Batch-Insensitive Dynamic GNN Approach to Address Temporal Discontinuity in Graph Streams

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    BADGNN adds a Lipschitz regularizer and an attention-temperature adjustment so that memory-based dynamic GNNs can train with large batches while keeping predictive accuracy.

Pith tools