Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting AI-Generated Video via Frame Consistency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02085 v8 pith:VCYTLPOJ submitted 2024-02-03 cs.CV cs.AI

Detecting AI-Generated Video via Frame Consistency

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords videogeneratedgenerationmodelstextbfdatasetdetectionpropose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The escalating quality of video generated by advanced video generation methods results in new security challenges, while there have been few relevant research efforts: 1) There is no open-source dataset for generated video detection, 2) No generated video detection method has been proposed so far. To this end, we propose an open-source dataset and a detection method for generated video for the first time. First, we propose a scalable dataset consisting of 964 prompts, covering various forgery targets, scenes, behaviors, and actions, as well as various generation models with different architectures and generation methods, including the most popular commercial models like OpenAI's Sora and Google's Veo. Second, we found via probing experiments that spatial artifact-based detectors lack generalizability. Hence, we propose a simple yet effective \textbf{de}tection model based on \textbf{f}rame \textbf{co}nsistency (\textbf{DeCoF}), which focuses on temporal artifacts by eliminating the impact of spatial artifacts during feature learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of DeCoF in detecting videos generated by unseen video generation models and confirm its powerful generalizability across several commercially proprietary models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RobustSora: De-Watermarked Benchmark for Robust AI-Generated Video Detection

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 8.0

    RobustSora benchmark demonstrates that current AI video detectors rely heavily on visible watermarks, with average accuracy drops of 6.6 percentage points when watermarks are erased and increased false alarms when wat...

  2. VideoASMR-Bench: Can AI-Generated ASMR Videos Fool VLMs and Humans?

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VideoASMR-Bench shows state-of-the-art VLMs fail to reliably detect AI-generated ASMR videos from real ones, though humans can still identify the fakes relatively easily.

  3. G2VD: Generalizable AI-Generated Video Detection via Counterfactual Intervention and Causal Disentanglement

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    G2VD reaches over 90% accuracy and ~0.95 AUC on hard GenVidBench cross-domain tests by VAE counterfactual intervention plus dual-branch HSIC disentanglement, using only 10% of training data.