REVIEW 2 cited by
Tracing the Roots of Facts in Multilingual Language Models: Independent, Shared, and Transferred Knowledge
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Acquiring factual knowledge for language models (LMs) in low-resource languages poses a serious challenge, thus resorting to cross-lingual transfer in multilingual LMs (ML-LMs). In this study, we ask how ML-LMs acquire and represent factual knowledge. Using the multilingual factual knowledge probing dataset, mLAMA, we first conducted a neuron investigation of ML-LMs (specifically, multilingual BERT). We then traced the roots of facts back to the knowledge source (Wikipedia) to identify the ways in which ML-LMs acquire specific facts. We finally identified three patterns of acquiring and representing facts in ML-LMs: language-independent, cross-lingual shared and transferred, and devised methods for differentiating them. Our findings highlight the challenge of maintaining consistent factual knowledge across languages, underscoring the need for better fact representation learning in ML-LMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cross-Lingual Transfer of Cultural Knowledge: An Asymmetric Phenomenon
Cross-lingual transfer of cultural knowledge is bidirectional for high-resource languages and asymmetric for low-resource ones, with corpus frequency correlating with transfer success.
-
Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for Baltic and Nordic languages: A study on Lithuanian History
On a translated Lithuanian history multiple-choice benchmark, GPT-4o beats all tested open and Nordic-tuned models, and Nordic-language fine-tuning does not improve accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.