Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

GPT-4V(ision) for Robotics: Multimodal Task Planning from Human Demonstration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12015 v4 pith:VEBY7NGB submitted 2023-11-20 cs.RO cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.ROcs.CLcs.CV
keywords gpt-4vtaskhumanvideosdetailsisionone-shotpipeline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a pipeline that enhances a general-purpose Vision Language Model, GPT-4V(ision), to facilitate one-shot visual teaching for robotic manipulation. This system analyzes videos of humans performing tasks and outputs executable robot programs that incorporate insights into affordances. The process begins with GPT-4V analyzing the videos to obtain textual explanations of environmental and action details. A GPT-4-based task planner then encodes these details into a symbolic task plan. Subsequently, vision systems spatially and temporally ground the task plan in the videos. Objects are identified using an open-vocabulary object detector, and hand-object interactions are analyzed to pinpoint moments of grasping and releasing. This spatiotemporal grounding allows for the gathering of affordance information (e.g., grasp types, waypoints, and body postures) critical for robot execution. Experiments across various scenarios demonstrate the method's efficacy in enabling real robots to operate from one-shot human demonstrations. Meanwhile, quantitative tests have revealed instances of hallucination in GPT-4V, highlighting the importance of incorporating human supervision within the pipeline. The prompts of GPT-4V/GPT-4 are available at this project page: https://microsoft.github.io/GPT4Vision-Robot-Manipulation-Prompts/

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SAGP: Semantic Affordance-Guided Grasp Planning via Coarse-Zone VLM Reasoning

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Coarse-zone VLM ratings re-rank geometric grasps to prefer functionally appropriate regions, preserving physical success while improving semantic appropriateness on handle-bearing objects.

  2. Integrating LMM Planners and 3D Skill Policies for Generalizable Manipulation

    cs.RO 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A robot framework combining GPT-4V planning with a 3D feature-field skill policy improves long-horizon kitchen manipulation accuracy over LLM baselines, according to small real-robot trials.

  3. LA-RCS: LLM-Agent-Based Robot Control System

    cs.RO 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    LA-RCS reports that a dual-agent LLM system controls a small car robot to complete 18 of 20 self-designed commands with the GPT-4o variant, but the supporting evaluation is inconsistent and not reproducible.

  4. MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad survey that organizes MLLM evaluation benchmarks into capability categories, explains benchmark construction and scoring methods, and identifies gaps in current evaluation practice.

Pith tools