pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20344 · v1 · pith:VETXU5B5new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Sensitivity of spectral lines to granulation: from the Sun to K-type stars

V. Vasilyev , K. Sowmya , A. I. Shapiro , N. Kostogryz , D. Vukadinovic , V. Witzke , T. Bhatia , A. Collier Cameron
show 2 more authors
L. Gizon S. K. Solanki
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 07:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords stellar granulationradial velocity jitterspectral line sensitivity3D magneto-convection simulationsK-type starsFeI FeII linesexoplanet detectionMURaM simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A diagnostic from 3D simulations separates granulation-sensitive lines from stable ones in late-G and K dwarfs, showing solar selections do not transfer well.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether a line-by-line diagnostic from solar 3D simulations transfers to cooler late-G and K dwarfs to reduce radial-velocity jitter caused by granulation. It tracks how each line's Doppler shift and strength respond to convective velocity and thermodynamic changes in MURaM snapshots. With falling effective temperature, weaker flows and shifting ionization make FeI lines less velocity-sensitive with smaller strength changes while FeII lines stay more responsive. This produces a robust separation that supports star-specific cross-correlation masks and line weights for RV work. Solar line choices based on equivalent-width stability therefore fail to perform as well on cooler stars.

Core claim

Extending the solar study, synthesis of high-resolution spectra from 3D time-dependent MURaM simulations shows that decreasing Teff produces weaker convective velocities and altered ionization balance, yielding a clearer split between line families. FeI lines display lower velocity sensitivity and smaller fractional strength variability while FeII lines remain more sensitive. Cumulative contribution functions tie the resulting spectroscopic velocity jitter to characteristic line-formation temperature. The diagnostic therefore separates stable from granulation-sensitive lines in late-G and K dwarfs.

What carries the argument

The line-by-line diagnostic that quantifies each FeI or FeII line's Doppler-shift and strength response to convective velocity and thermodynamic fluctuations using spatial variability across a single granulation snapshot.

If this is right

  • Spectral-type-aware cross-correlation masks become feasible for late-G and K dwarfs.
  • Line-by-line RV weights based on velocity sensitivity rather than equivalent-width stability reduce granulation jitter more effectively.
  • Solar-optimized line selections are not generally portable to cooler stars.
  • The separation between stable FeI and sensitive FeII lines grows clearer at lower effective temperatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same diagnostic to other species beyond iron could yield additional stable lines for RV work.
  • Direct observational tests on real K-dwarf spectra would provide an independent check on the simulation proxy.
  • The temperature trend suggests analogous line lists could be derived for M dwarfs where granulation jitter remains a key limit.

Load-bearing premise

Spatial line-profile variability measured in one granulation snapshot from the 3D MURaM simulations acts as a reliable proxy for the temporal variability that drives real observed radial velocities.

What would settle it

Measure the actual radial-velocity contribution of individual FeI and FeII lines in high-resolution spectra of K dwarfs and test whether the observed sensitivities match the ordering and magnitudes predicted by the simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20344 by A. Collier Cameron, A. I. Shapiro, D. Vukadinovic, K. Sowmya, L. Gizon, N. Kostogryz, S. K. Solanki, T. Bhatia, V. Vasilyev, V. Witzke.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: MURaM simulations used in the analysis. Top: Maps of vertical velocity Vz at the continuum optical-depth unity surface (τRoss = 1 surface) for the Sun (left), G9 (middle), and K4 (right). We define granules and intergranular lanes by the sign of the vertical velocity VZ , granules have VZ < 0 (up-flows, toward the observer) and intergranular lanes have VZ > 0 (down-flows, away from the observer). Middle: H… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Synthesized spectral lines. Excitation potentials and oscillator strengths of analyzed Fe i (blue) and Fe ii (green) lines. We synthesize emergent specific intensities from each cube with the MPS-ATLAS radiative-transfer code in the LTE approximation, adopting a “1.5D” approach in which the RT is solved along many mutually parallel rays through the 3D cube while accounting for the line-of-sight velocity fi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dependence of Fe i and Fe ii line sensitivity to granulation on effective temperature. Each panel shows, for individual lines, their sensitivity to granulation as quantified by the RV-scaled line-shift scatter σv on the x-axis and the fractional equivalent-width scatter SW on the y-axis. Symbols denote ionization stage (circles: Fe i; stars: Fe ii) and marker sizes are proportional to the line equivalent w… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial maps of line strength and COG velocity for a Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatial maps of line strength and COG velocity for a representative Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of solar line sensitivities with those in the G9 and K4 models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Standard deviation of the line center of gravity as a function of RV-weighted line-formation tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Stellar granulation produces radial-velocity (RV) jitter at the 1 m/s level in Sun-like stars, limiting Earth-analog detection. A route beyond this limit is to weight spectral lines according to their granulation sensitivity. We apply a line-by-line diagnostic from 3D magneto-convection simulations that measures how each line's Doppler shift and strength respond to convective velocity and thermodynamic fluctuations. Extending our solar study, which used spatial line-profile variability across one granulation snapshot as an efficient proxy for temporal variability, we test whether this diagnostic transfers to cooler stars and examine how sensitivity changes with spectral type. We synthesize high-resolution spectra with MPS-ATLAS from 3D time-dependent MURaM simulations of the Sun and late-G and K dwarfs, focusing on FeI and FeII lines spanning broad ranges of excitation potential and strength. With decreasing $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$, weaker convective velocities and changing ionization balance produce a clearer separation between line families: FeI lines show lower velocity sensitivity and smaller fractional strength variability, while FeII lines are more sensitive. Cumulative contribution functions link spectroscopic velocity jitter to characteristic line-formation temperature. The diagnostic robustly separates stable and granulation-sensitive lines in late-G and K dwarfs, enabling spectral-type-aware cross-correlation masks and line-by-line RV weights. Solar-optimized line selections are therefore not generally portable to cooler stars, particularly when based on equivalent-width stability rather than velocity sensitivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends a prior solar study by applying a line-by-line diagnostic derived from 3D MURaM magneto-convection simulations and MPS-ATLAS spectrum synthesis to assess granulation sensitivity of Fe I and Fe II lines in the Sun and late-G/K dwarfs. It reports that decreasing T_eff produces weaker convective velocities and altered ionization balance, yielding a clearer separation with Fe I lines showing lower velocity sensitivity and smaller fractional strength variability than Fe II lines. Cumulative contribution functions are used to link jitter to formation temperature. The central claim is that the diagnostic robustly separates stable and sensitive lines in cooler stars, enabling spectral-type-aware cross-correlation masks and RV weights, and that solar-optimized selections (especially those based on equivalent-width stability) are not portable.

Significance. If the diagnostic and its transferability hold, the work provides a simulation-grounded route to reduce granulation-induced RV jitter below the 1 m/s level for K dwarfs, directly aiding Earth-analog exoplanet detection. The explicit separation of line families by spectral type and the physical connection via contribution functions offer a practical framework for constructing improved line lists and masks. The extension from the solar case to a sequence of cooler models is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (method description): The central claim that the diagnostic 'robustly separates' lines in late-G and K dwarfs rests on reusing the solar proxy of 'spatial line-profile variability across one granulation snapshot' as an efficient stand-in for temporal Doppler shifts. No multi-snapshot time-series validation or quantitative assessment of snapshot-to-snapshot variance is reported for the cooler MURaM models, where lower convective velocities and changed granulation scales may weaken the spatial-temporal correlation; this directly affects whether the reported Fe I vs. Fe II separation maps to real RV jitter weights.
  2. [Results] Results section (cumulative contribution functions): The statement that these functions 'link spectroscopic velocity jitter to characteristic line-formation temperature' is presented without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., correlation coefficients or scatter plots across the line sample), leaving the physical basis for the clearer separation at lower T_eff under-specified relative to the strength of the portability conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the number of snapshots or time steps used for each spectral type to allow readers to judge the robustness of the variability measures.
  2. [Table 1 or Methods] A short table summarizing the MURaM simulation parameters (T_eff, log g, [Fe/H], magnetic field strength) for the Sun, late-G, and K models would improve traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review. The comments raise important points about the robustness of the diagnostic when extended beyond the Sun. We respond to each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to clarify the assumptions and strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (method description): The central claim that the diagnostic 'robustly separates' lines in late-G and K dwarfs rests on reusing the solar proxy of 'spatial line-profile variability across one granulation snapshot' as an efficient stand-in for temporal Doppler shifts. No multi-snapshot time-series validation or quantitative assessment of snapshot-to-snapshot variance is reported for the cooler MURaM models, where lower convective velocities and changed granulation scales may weaken the spatial-temporal correlation; this directly affects whether the reported Fe I vs. Fe II separation maps to real RV jitter weights.

    Authors: We agree that the transferability of the spatial proxy merits explicit discussion. The method is identical to that validated against time-series data in our prior solar study, where spatial variability across a single snapshot was shown to correlate well with temporal Doppler shifts. The cooler MURaM models are time-dependent, but computational cost limited the present analysis to representative snapshots. Because convective velocities decrease with T_eff, the granulation evolution timescale lengthens, which we expect to preserve or even improve the spatial-temporal correspondence. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §2 that (i) recalls the solar validation, (ii) provides a simple scaling argument based on the measured reduction in rms velocity, and (iii) quantifies the snapshot-to-snapshot scatter using the multiple snapshots already available in the simulation archive. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (cumulative contribution functions): The statement that these functions 'link spectroscopic velocity jitter to characteristic line-formation temperature' is presented without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., correlation coefficients or scatter plots across the line sample), leaving the physical basis for the clearer separation at lower T_eff under-specified relative to the strength of the portability conclusion.

    Authors: We accept that the physical link would be more convincing with quantitative measures. The cumulative contribution functions are intended to show that lines forming higher in the atmosphere experience smaller velocity fluctuations. In the revised version we will include (i) a scatter plot of velocity sensitivity versus mean formation temperature for the full Fe I and Fe II samples and (ii) the Pearson correlation coefficient between these quantities, computed separately for each spectral type. These additions will be placed in the Results section immediately after the contribution-function figure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: new results derived from independent MURaM simulations for cooler stars

full rationale

The paper applies its line-by-line diagnostic to fresh 3D time-dependent MURaM simulations of late-G and K dwarfs, synthesizing spectra and measuring Doppler and strength responses directly in those models. While the abstract references the authors' prior solar study to describe the spatial-variability proxy, the reported clearer separation between Fe I and Fe II families, the cumulative contribution functions, and the conclusion that solar-optimized selections are not portable all follow from the new Teff-dependent calculations rather than reducing to the solar inputs by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is invoked, and the simulations themselves are set independently of the target RV-jitter claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The report is based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5839 in / 1228 out tokens · 26477 ms · 2026-05-21T07:07:33.994565+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Valenti, J. A. 2022, A&A, 664, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243276 Anglada-Escud´ e, G., & Butler, R. P. 2012, ApJS, 200, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/15 Anna John, A., Al Moulla, K., O’Sullivan, N. K., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 1974, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1523

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243276 2022

  2. [2]

    J., Allende Prieto, C., & Blomme, R

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., Allende Prieto, C., & Blomme, R. 2005, A&A, 431, 693, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041951

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041951 2005

  3. [3]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 2009

  4. [4]

    Prieto, C., & Stein, R. F. 2000, A&A, 359, 729, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0005320

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0005320 2000

  5. [5]

    1996, A&AS, 119, 373

    Baranne, A., Queloz, D., Mayor, M., et al. 1996, A&AS, 119, 373

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    H., Reiners, A., & Sch¨ ussler, M

    Beeck, B., Cameron, R. H., Reiners, A., & Sch¨ ussler, M. 2013, A&A, 558, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321345

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321345 2013

  7. [7]

    2001, A&A, 374, 733, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010730

    Bouchy, F., Pepe, F., & Queloz, D. 2001, A&A, 374, 733, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010730

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010730 2001

  8. [8]

    Cheung, M. C. M., Sch¨ ussler, M., & Moreno-Insertis, F. 2007, A&A, 461, 1163, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066390 Collier Cameron, A., Ford, E. B., Shahaf, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 1699, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1323

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066390 2007

  9. [9]

    2020, A&A, 633, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936548

    Lovis, C. 2020, A&A, 633, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936548

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936548 2020

  10. [10]

    Cuntz, M., & Guinan, E. F. 2016, ApJ, 827, 79, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/79

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/79 2016

  11. [11]

    2023, A&A, 679, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347142

    Dravins, D., & Ludwig, H.-G. 2023, A&A, 679, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347142

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347142 2023

  12. [12]

    2021, A&A, 649, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039995

    Dravins, D., Ludwig, H.-G., & Freytag, B. 2021, A&A, 649, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039995

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039995 2021

  13. [13]

    2018, A&A, 620, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833795

    Dumusque, X. 2018, A&A, 620, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833795

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833795 2018

  14. [14]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.27635, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.27635

    Dumusque, X., Al Moulla, K., Cretignier, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.27635, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.27635

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.27635 2025

  15. [15]

    A., Anglada-Escude, G., Arriagada, P., et al

    Fischer, D. A., Anglada-Escude, G., Arriagada, P., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 066001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/066001

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/066001 2016

  16. [16]

    M., Witzke, V., et al

    Frame, G., Cegla, H. M., Witzke, V., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf639

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf639 2025

  17. [17]

    Gray, D. F. 2005, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316036570

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781316036570 2005

  18. [18]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  19. [19]

    A., Stempels, H

    Kupka, F., Piskunov, N., Ryabchikova, T. A., Stempels, H. C., & Weiss, W. W. 1999, A&AS, 138, 119, doi: 10.1051/aas:1999267

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1999267 1999

  20. [20]

    S., Naylor, T., Haywood, R

    Lakeland, B. S., Naylor, T., Haywood, R. D., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7681, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3723

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3723 2024

  21. [21]

    2013, A&A, 557, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321274

    Magic, Z., Collet, R., Asplund, M., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321274

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321274 2013

  22. [22]

    1990, A&A, 228, 155 Nordlund, ˚A., Stein, R

    Nordlund, A., & Dravins, D. 1990, A&A, 228, 155 Nordlund, ˚A., Stein, R. F., & Asplund, M. 2009, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 6, 2, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2009-2

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2009-2 1990

  23. [23]

    L., Ford, E

    Palumbo, M. L., Ford, E. B., Gonzalez, E. B., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4c6d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad4c6d 2024

  24. [24]

    Palumbo, III, M. L. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.09861, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.09861

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.09861 2025

  25. [25]

    2002, A&A, 388, 632, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020433

    Pepe, F., Mayor, M., Galland, F., et al. 2002, A&A, 388, 632, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020433

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020433 2002

  26. [26]

    E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T

    Piskunov, N. E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T. A., Weiss, W. W., & Jeffery, C. S. 1995, A&AS, 112, 525

    work page 1995

  27. [27]

    2014, ApJ, 789, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132

    Rempel, M. 2014, ApJ, 789, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/2/132 2014

  28. [28]

    L., Schneider, A

    Richey-Yowell, T., Shkolnik, E. L., Schneider, A. C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafa74 2019

  29. [29]

    Rutten, R. J. 2003, Radiative Transfer in Stellar Atmospheres

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    L., et al

    Ryabchikova, T., Piskunov, N., Kurucz, R. L., et al. 2015, PhyS, 90, 054005, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 2015

  31. [31]

    1975, ApJ, 195, 137, doi: 10.1086/153313

    Schwarzschild, M. 1975, ApJ, 195, 137, doi: 10.1086/153313

    work page doi:10.1086/153313 1975

  32. [32]

    Sensitivity of spectral lines to granulation: The Sun

    Sowmya, K., Shapiro, A. I., Vasilyev, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09824, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09824 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09824 2025

  33. [33]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 V¨ ogler, A., Shelyag, S., Sch¨ ussler, M., et al. 2005, A&A, 429, 335, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041507

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  34. [34]

    I., Cernetic, M., et al

    Witzke, V., Shapiro, A. I., Cernetic, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140275

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140275 2021

  35. [35]

    I., Kostogryz, N

    Witzke, V., Shapiro, A. I., Kostogryz, N. M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346099

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346099 2024

  36. [36]

    L., Dumusque, X., Ford, E

    Zhao, L. L., Dumusque, X., Ford, E. B., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 173, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acf83e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acf83e 2023