KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parsers
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:VF3PGXIOrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The goal of database question answering is to enable natural language querying of real-life relational databases in diverse application domains. Recently, large-scale datasets such as Spider and WikiSQL facilitated novel modeling techniques for text-to-SQL parsing, improving zero-shot generalization to unseen databases. In this work, we examine the challenges that still prevent these techniques from practical deployment. First, we present KaggleDBQA, a new cross-domain evaluation dataset of real Web databases, with domain-specific data types, original formatting, and unrestricted questions. Second, we re-examine the choice of evaluation tasks for text-to-SQL parsers as applied in real-life settings. Finally, we augment our in-domain evaluation task with database documentation, a naturally occurring source of implicit domain knowledge. We show that KaggleDBQA presents a challenge to state-of-the-art zero-shot parsers but a more realistic evaluation setting and creative use of associated database documentation boosts their accuracy by over 13.2%, doubling their performance.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Spider 2.0-AIFunc: Extending Real-World Text-to-SQL to AI-Native SQL Workflows
Spider 2.0-AIFunc is a 465-instance benchmark for evaluating text-to-SQL systems on queries that incorporate Snowflake Cortex AI functions, with evaluations of ten models showing proprietary models reach 67-70% accuracy.
-
Natural Language Interfaces for Spatial and Temporal Databases: A Comprehensive Overview of Methods, Taxonomy, and Future Directions
A literature survey that taxonomizes methods, datasets, and evaluation practices for natural language interfaces to geospatial and temporal databases while identifying recurring trends and future directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.