Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Common 7B Language Models Already Possess Strong Math Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04706 v1 pith:VGEWUJPV submitted 2024-03-07 cs.CL cs.AI

Common 7B Language Models Already Possess Strong Math Capabilities

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords mathmodelsaccuracycapabilitiescommondatagsm8kmathematical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Mathematical capabilities were previously believed to emerge in common language models only at a very large scale or require extensive math-related pre-training. This paper shows that the LLaMA-2 7B model with common pre-training already exhibits strong mathematical abilities, as evidenced by its impressive accuracy of 97.7% and 72.0% on the GSM8K and MATH benchmarks, respectively, when selecting the best response from 256 random generations. The primary issue with the current base model is the difficulty in consistently eliciting its inherent mathematical capabilities. Notably, the accuracy for the first answer drops to 49.5% and 7.9% on the GSM8K and MATH benchmarks, respectively. We find that simply scaling up the SFT data can significantly enhance the reliability of generating correct answers. However, the potential for extensive scaling is constrained by the scarcity of publicly available math questions. To overcome this limitation, we employ synthetic data, which proves to be nearly as effective as real data and shows no clear saturation when scaled up to approximately one million samples. This straightforward approach achieves an accuracy of 82.6% on GSM8K and 40.6% on MATH using LLaMA-2 7B models, surpassing previous models by 14.2% and 20.8%, respectively. We also provide insights into scaling behaviors across different reasoning complexities and error types.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MARD: Mirror-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Mechanism-Level Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MARD-7B outperforms baselines and GPT-4o on novel drug pairs for mechanism-level DDI prediction via a new distillation pipeline with verifiable process rewards and releases all resources.

  2. DEL: Digit Entropy Loss for Numerical Learning of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    DEL is a new loss for LLM numerical learning that applies supervised digit entropy optimization and extends to floating-point numbers, showing improved accuracy and distance metrics over prior methods on math benchmarks.

  3. Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personas

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A curated set of one billion personas enables scalable, diverse synthetic data generation for LLM training across reasoning, instructions, knowledge, NPCs, and tools.

  4. Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs

    cs.LG 2024-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    Step-DPO performs preference optimization on individual reasoning steps rather than complete answers, producing nearly 3% accuracy gains on MATH for 70B+ parameter models with 10K preference pairs.

  5. FedProxy: Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs via Proxy SLMs and Heterogeneity-Aware Fusion

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FedProxy replaces weak adapters with a proxy SLM for federated LLM fine-tuning, outperforming prior methods and approaching centralized performance via compression, heterogeneity-aware aggregation, and training-free fusion.

  6. The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.