REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Zero-Label Language Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper explores zero-label learning in Natural Language Processing (NLP), whereby no human-annotated data is used anywhere during training and models are trained purely on synthetic data. At the core of our framework is a novel approach for better leveraging the powerful pretrained language models. Specifically, inspired by the recent success of few-shot inference on GPT-3, we present a training data creation procedure named Unsupervised Data Generation (UDG), which leverages few-shot prompts to synthesize high-quality training data without real human annotations. Our method enables zero-label learning as we train task-specific models solely on the synthetic data, yet we achieve better or comparable results from strong baseline models trained on human-labeled data. Furthermore, when mixed with labeled data, our approach serves as a highly effective data augmentation procedure, achieving new state-of-the-art results on the SuperGLUE benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Can Gradient Descent Simulate Prompting?
A MAML-style meta-training objective makes a single gradient step on new text recover part of the performance that prompting achieves, on reversal-curse and passage-QA tasks.
-
DeepThink: Aligning Language Models with Domain-Specific User Intents
DeepThink improves domain-specific QA by synthesizing conversation-based training data and refining answers with retrieval-augmented feedback, beating a GPT-4-turbo+RAG assistant by 7.92% on advertising-domain real us...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.