Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models in Introductory Programming Education: ChatGPT's Performance and Implications for Assessments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.08572 v1 pith:VJPIUD4K submitted 2023-08-15 cs.SE cs.AIcs.HC

Large Language Models in Introductory Programming Education: ChatGPT's Performance and Implications for Assessments

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.HC
keywords llmsperformanceprogrammingwereassessmentavailabilitycodecodingbat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the performance of the Large Language Models (LLMs) ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in solving introductory programming tasks. Based on the performance, implications for didactic scenarios and assessment formats utilizing LLMs are derived. For the analysis, 72 Python tasks for novice programmers were selected from the free site CodingBat. Full task descriptions were used as input to the LLMs, while the generated replies were evaluated using CodingBat's unit tests. In addition, the general availability of textual explanations and program code was analyzed. The results show high scores of 94.4 to 95.8% correct responses and reliable availability of textual explanations and program code, which opens new ways to incorporate LLMs into programming education and assessment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering Techniques

    cs.CL 2024-06 accept novelty 7.0

    This systematic survey organizes prompt engineering into a taxonomy of 58 LLM techniques and 40 others, supplies a shared vocabulary, and offers guidelines for state-of-the-art models.

  2. When LLM Tutoring Responses Work: Evidence from Student Programming Conversations

    cs.HC 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    LLM response styles show small but significant associations with productive student continuation in programming dialogues, with larger differences under high cognitive load and debugging.

  3. Investigating Conversational Agents to Support Secondary School Students Learning CSP

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A classroom evaluation with 45 high school students finds that conversational agents can aid CSP learning by delivering context-appropriate information, comparing general and custom agent approaches for effectiveness ...