REVIEW 2 cited by
E-cheating Prevention Measures: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study addresses the current issues in online assessments, which are particularly relevant during the Covid-19 pandemic. Our focus is on academic dishonesty associated with online assessments. We investigated the prevalence of potential e-cheating using a case study and propose preventive measures that could be implemented. We have utilised an e-cheating intelligence agent as a mechanism for detecting the practices of online cheating, which is composed of two major modules: the internet protocol (IP) detector and the behaviour detector. The intelligence agent monitors the behaviour of the students and has the ability to prevent and detect any malicious practices. It can be used to assign randomised multiple-choice questions in a course examination and be integrated with online learning programs to monitor the behaviour of the students. The proposed method was tested on various data sets confirming its effectiveness. The results revealed accuracies of 68% for the deep neural network (DNN); 92% for the long-short term memory (LSTM); 95% for the DenseLSTM; and, 86% for the recurrent neural network (RNN).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLM-Assisted Cheating Detection in Korean Language via Keystrokes
Keystroke temporal and rhythmic features detect whether Korean writing is original, paraphrased from ChatGPT, or transcribed from ChatGPT, with temporal features stronger in matched cognitive settings and rhythmic fea...
-
What's Privacy Good for? Measuring Privacy as a Shield from Harms due to Personal Data Use
A survey of 400 students shows that 14 perceived privacy harms form a single reliable scale that varies by data type and context.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.