Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mitigating Gender Bias Amplification in Distribution by Posterior Regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.06251 v1 pith:VLZQ4SSG submitted 2020-05-13 cs.CL cs.CVcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGstat.ML
keywords biasamplificationdistributionfurthergenderperformanceposteriorregularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Advanced machine learning techniques have boosted the performance of natural language processing. Nevertheless, recent studies, e.g., Zhao et al. (2017) show that these techniques inadvertently capture the societal bias hidden in the corpus and further amplify it. However, their analysis is conducted only on models' top predictions. In this paper, we investigate the gender bias amplification issue from the distribution perspective and demonstrate that the bias is amplified in the view of predicted probability distribution over labels. We further propose a bias mitigation approach based on posterior regularization. With little performance loss, our method can almost remove the bias amplification in the distribution. Our study sheds the light on understanding the bias amplification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Algorithmic Gender Prediction Is Illegitimate, But Gender Imputation Can Yield Valid Measurements

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gender prediction is illegitimate but gender imputation can still yield valid disparity measurements for traditional sexism, though not for oppositional sexism.

Pith tools