Poisson vertex algebras in supersymmetric field theories

Jihwan Oh; Junya Yagi

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Poisson vertex algebras in supersymmetric field theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Q-cohomology of local operators in a topological-holomorphic sector of an N=2 supersymmetric field theory is a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra; in four-dimensional superconformal theories it is the classical limit of the known vertex…

desk verdict Solid and useful physical construction of PVAs in topological-holomorphic sectors, but the Jacobi identity at the center of the structure theorem is sketched rather than proven; worth refereeing with a demand to fill that gap. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05791 v4 pith:VOMYYDPK submitted 2019-08-15 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA

Jihwan Oh , Junya Yagi This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 17B6917B6381T6081T45

keywords Poissonvertexalgebratopological-holomorphicsectorN=2supersymmetrytopologicaldescentλ-bracketclassicallimitsupersymmetricfieldtheory

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Supersymmetric quantum field theories can have sectors that are topological in some directions and holomorphic in one complex direction, so that observables there are independent of the topological coordinates and vary holomorphically. This paper shows that in such a sector, the Q-cohomology of local operators is always a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra, a structure combining a commutative associative product with a λ-bracket that plays the role of a Poisson bracket and has degree −d. The construction uses a topological-holomorphic version of descent and requires no conformal invariance. For a four-dimensional N=2 superconformal theory, the resulting Poisson vertex algebra is the classical limit of the vertex algebra built from local operators, and in the unitary case the two are isomorphic. This puts the known four-dimensional vertex algebras and the older Poisson algebras of topological quantum field theory into one framework and extends them to nonconformal theories.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the λ-bracket {O_1}_λ O_2, defined by integrating $e^{{λ(z_1−z_2)}}$ dz_1 ∧ $O_1^{{(d)}}$ over a small (d+1)-sphere around the second operator, where $O_1^{{(d)}}$ is the dth topological-holomorphic descendant of O_1. Together with pointwise multiplication on C, this bracket satisfies sesquilinearity, a graded symmetry, the Jacobi identity, and the Leibniz rule, which is exactly the structure of a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra. The mechanism that makes it work is the descent equation: because translations in M and the antiholomorphic direction are Q-exact, integrals of descendants are Q-closed and depend only on homology classes; the radius of the sphere can be shrunk to zero, so the bracket is local. The parameter λ is a formal variable keeping track of the Taylor expansion of the holomorphic two-form around the collision point, and assigning J(λ)=1 makes the bracket compatible with the spin grading.

What would settle it

Take a four-dimensional N=2 gauge theory with a nonconformal matter representation and compute the λ-bracket of two local Q-cohomology classes on $R^{2}$×C using the paper's descent formula; if the result is not reproduced by the proposed classical BRST cohomology of gauged symplectic bosons, the construction is measuring something other than the local-operator algebra. More directly, if any Q-closed local operator, after twisted translation by exp(iZw−i\bar Z\bar w), has a P_w- or P_{\bar w}-translation that is not Q-exact, the descent equation breaks and no Poisson vertex algebra exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for any quantum field theory on M×C carrying a topological-holomorphic sector, defined by a fermionic scalar charge Q and a fermionic one-form charge Q with $Q^{2}$=0, [Q,P]=0, and [Q,Q]=iP_i dy^i+iP_{\bar z} d\bar z, the Q-cohomology V of local operators is a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra. The proof constructs descendants by topological-holomorphic descent and uses them to define a λ-bracket; the Jacobi identity and Leibniz rule follow from decomposing integration cycles in configuration space. Concretely, all N=2 supersymmetric theories in three dimensions and N=2 theories in four dimensions admit such sectors after a central-charge-twisted translation. In the four-dimensional superconformal case, V has a one-parameter deformation V^ℏ by Ω-deformation; as ℏ→0, V^ℏ reduces to V, and for unitary theories it is isomorphic to the vertex algebra of local operators studied in [7]. Computed examples include free chiral multiplets, free hypermultiplets, and gauge theories, where the Poisson vertex algebra is identified with classical BRST cohomology.

Load-bearing premise

The construction rests on the existence of a fermionic scalar charge Q and a fermionic one-form charge Q with $Q^{2}$=0 and [Q,Q]=iP_i dy^i+iP_{\bar z}d\bar z, so that translations along the topological directions and the antiholomorphic direction are Q-exact; this requires twisting translations by the central charge in the three- and four-dimensional N=2 theories. If that twist cannot be made consistently, no Poisson vertex algebra follows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In three-dimensional N=2 theories of free chiral multiplets, the Poisson vertex algebra is computed as Dolbeault cohomology of certain holomorphic vector bundles on the target space; dimensional reduction turns it into the B-model Poisson algebra with the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket.
For four-dimensional N=2 superconformal theories, V is the classical limit of the Ω-deformed vertex algebra V^ℏ, and in the unitary case this vertex algebra is the one constructed from local operators in [7].
For free hypermultiplets, the Poisson vertex algebra has λ-bracket {[q_a]_λ [q_b]} ∝ ǫ_ab, reproducing the classical limit of symplectic bosons.
For N=2 gauge theories, the associated Poisson vertex algebra is the classical BRST cohomology of gauged symplectic bosons; this description stays well defined for nonconformal matter content where the quantum BRST charge is anomalous.
The vacuum character of the Poisson vertex algebra reproduces the superconformal index in the Schur limit and provides a candidate definition of that index for nonconformal theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the λ-bracket is local, the Poisson vertex algebra should be insensitive to twisted masses and central charges; the same algebraic structure could survive in the presence of line defects or boundaries, giving a bulk Poisson vertex algebra acting on boundary vertex algebras, a direction the paper only gestures at.
A direct test of the nonconformal proposal would be to compute the classical BRST cohomology for an abelian gauge theory with a single charged hypermultiplet and compare it with the physical Q-cohomology; exact agreement would certify the extension, while any mismatch would locate the limit of the paper's claim.
If dualities map topological-holomorphic sectors to one another, the associated Poisson vertex algebras must be isomorphic; checking such isomorphisms for known mirror or S-dual pairs could turn the construction into a practical duality detector, which the paper suggests but does not carry out.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version. Oh and Yagi build a clean physical construction of Poisson vertex algebras in topological-holomorphic sectors—descent on M×C, secondary products, λ-bracket—and they get the free-field checks right. But the stress-test is correct that the Jacobi identity (2.30) at the center of the structure theorem is sketched, not derived. If you send this out, you should make them show their work there.

The genuinely new part is the systematic descent construction and its explicit output: free chiral multiplets in 3d give the Dolbeault-cohomology picture, free hypermultiplets in 4d give the ε_ab symplectic-boson λ-bracket, and the gauge-theory section states a classical BRST-cohomology description, clearly labeled as a proposal. The paper is also honest about what is not new: PVA structure was mentioned in Beem's talks, and the mathematical backbone is the Poisson additivity theorem of Rozenblyum and Safronov. The citation pattern looks right; the self-citation [25] is used for an identification proven in that earlier paper, which is legitimate.

Where the paper is soft: the proof of (2.30). The text says a certain Conf_3 cycle is homologous up to a sign to another, that the sign can be fixed from a special case, and that extra Q_μ terms can be avoided by invoking the symmetry (2.28). None of that is actually shown, and boundary terms at infinity in Conf_3 are not discussed. Since (2.30) is what makes V a Lie conformal algebra, the central claim of Section 2.5 rests on an assertion. I don't think this is a dealbreaker—the configuration-space approach is the right one and Poisson additivity independently supports the conclusion—but it is a real gap. The examples don't help here either: every λ-bracket computed in Sections 3 and 4 is λ-independent, so nothing in the paper exercises the Jacobi identity in a nontrivial λ-dependent case. The equivariant-homology step in Section 4.2 is also formal, though that comparison is less exposed because it leans on results already published by the same authors and by Jeong.

Who is this for: researchers working on holomorphic twists, the SCFT/VOA correspondence, and algebraic structures of local operators. The free-field computations are checkable and consistent with the known vertex algebras in the classical limit, and the nonconformal proposals are labeled as such, which is the honest way to present them. My verdict: it deserves a serious refereeing. Send it out with instructions that the referee require a real derivation of (2.30) and a comment on the equivariant descent comparison; it should come back much stronger.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the Q-cohomology of local operators in a supersymmetric quantum field theory admitting a topological-holomorphic sector carries a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra structure. In Section 2, given supercharges Q and Q satisfying (2.2)-(2.5), the authors define secondary products and a lambda-bracket by topological-holomorphic descent, state sesquilinearity, skew-symmetry, the Jacobi identity and the Leibniz rule, and conclude that V is a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra. Section 3 applies the construction to three-dimensional N=2 theories, identifying the topological-holomorphic sector, computing free chiral multiplets, discussing sigma models and free vector multiplets, and making general remarks for N=2 superconformal field theories. Section 4 treats four-dimensional N=2 theories, relates the associated Poisson vertex algebra to the classical limit of the vertex algebra of Beem et al. via Omega-deformation, computes free hypermultiplets, and proposes a classical BRST description for gauge theories, including non-conformal ones.

Significance. If the central Jacobi-identity proof is completed, the paper provides a valuable bridge between cohomological TQFT techniques and the four-dimensional N=2 superconformal field theory/vertex algebra correspondence. It gives a concrete physical realization of Poisson vertex algebras and connects them with the secondary-product construction of [6], the Omega-deformation quantization of [25,26], and the Schur index. The free-field computations in Sections 3.2 and 4.3 are explicit and the comparison with symplectic bosons is convincing. The proposal that classical BRST cohomology describes Poisson vertex algebras for non-conformal gauge theories is concrete and falsifiable. The main weakness is that the defining algebraic identities are not fully established from the descent construction, and the examples only test lambda-brackets that are independent of lambda; the significance of the paper would be materially increased by a complete proof of the Jacobi identity and, ideally, an example with a non-trivial lambda-dependence.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.4, Eq. (2.30)] The proof of the Jacobi identity is a sketch, not a derivation. The text asserts that a certain cycle in Conf_3(R^d x C^x) is "up to a sign" homologous to another cycle, and that the second cycle "again up to a sign" gives the desired term, but the signs are never fixed. The key subtlety, that (O_1^* O_2)^* differs from O_1^* O_2^* by terms involving Q_mu acting on O_1^*, is not resolved: the appeal to the symmetry (2.28) is not carried out at the chain level, and no cancellation of the extra terms is shown. Boundary terms at infinity in Conf_3(R^d x C^x) are not discussed. Since (2.30) is the defining Jacobi identity for a Lie conformal algebra, the central claim of Section 2.5 that V is a d-shifted Poisson vertex algebra is not established unless this proof is completed. The examples in Sections 3.2 and 4.3 compute only lambda-brackets that are independent of lambda, so they do not exercise the Jacobi identity in any nontrivial lambda-dependent case.
[Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.38)-(4.40)] The relation between the equivariant homology class of the sphere S^3_x2 and the circle S^1_z2 is asserted rather than proved. Equation (4.40), including the sign and the factor 2 pi i / hbar, is essential for the identification of the equivariant descent integral with the lambda-bracket [O^hbar_1]_lambda [O^hbar_2]/hbar. Footnote 9 says that "one can easily show" the reduction, but the computation is not given. Moreover, taking the limit hbar -> 0 of a cycle that is divided by hbar requires control of equivariant chains and of possible boundary terms, not just a homology-level statement. Please provide a detailed derivation or a precise reference that justifies this step.
[Section 4.2, injection V^hbar -> V] The argument that a nonzero Q^hbar-cohomology class gives a nontrivial Q-cohomology class assumes that a representative can be written as O + hbar O_1 with O_1 a formal power series in hbar. While the OPE coefficients are stated to be analytic in hbar in (4.31), the statement that the hbar-correction can destroy but not create cohomology is not proved. The identification of the classical limit as a subalgebra of V depends on this injection. The later statement that unitarity upgrades the inclusion to equality, based on the shared harmonic condition (4.41), also needs a proof that the harmonic representatives of V^hbar correspond bijectively to those of V under the constructed map.

minor comments (4)

[Section 2.3, Eq. (2.25)] The expansion of kappa(z1,z2) around z2 uses z1 both as a coordinate and as a form index; writing the coefficient as kappa_{z1 z2}(z2,z2) is confusing because the derivative with respect to z1 of a function evaluated at z2 is not explicitly defined. Please clarify the notation.
[Section 2.4, footnote 3] The Mayer-Vietoris computation of H_{d+2}(Conf_2(R^d x C^x)) is too terse; in particular, the notation d^{-1}(...) is used without definition, and the displayed sequence is hard to follow. Please expand this footnote or move the computation to the main text.
[Section 4.1] The statement that a cylinder is homeomorphic to S^3 "by the Poincare conjecture" is misleading; the homeomorphism between a cylinder with its two ends collapsed to points and S^3 is a basic fact about one-point compactifications, not the Poincare conjecture. Please correct the attribution.
[Section 4.4] In the proposal that the Poisson vertex algebra for a non-conformal gauge theory is the classical BRST cohomology of V_{bc-gamma beta}, it would be helpful to state explicitly the grading with respect to which the cohomology is taken and to write the action of the classical differential on the generators gamma, beta, b and c.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the PVA construction is self-contained and the sole self-citation is used as external published support, not as a premise.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation chain is self-contained. In Section 2, the λ-bracket is constructed from topological–holomorphic descent, and the sesquilinearity, symmetry, and Jacobi identities are argued from the supercharge relations (2.2)–(2.5), the behavior of the integration cycles, and the Leibniz rule for the secondary product. None of these steps defines the λ-bracket in terms of the final PVA structure or fits a parameter to a subset of data and then predicts a closely related quantity. The examples in Sections 3 and 4 compute λ-brackets directly from free-field equations of motion, propagators, and symmetry constraints; no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. The only self-citation with possible load-bearing role is [25], cited in Section 4.2 for the statement that, for a unitary N=2 superconformal field theory, V^ℏ is isomorphic to the vertex operator algebra of [7]. That is a published, peer-reviewed result used as external input to identify the deformed vertex algebra, not a premise on which the existence or structure of the Poisson vertex algebra rests; the topological–holomorphic construction of V is independent of that identification. The Jacobi identity proof in Section 2.4 is admittedly sketched, with signs and boundary terms not fully displayed, but this is a completeness or rigor concern rather than circularity. No equation is shown to equal its own input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force a choice. Accordingly, the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The construction relies on standard supersymmetry algebras, locality, and external mathematical theorems (Poisson additivity, Poincare lemma). The free-parameter list is empty because parameters such as twisted mass m, t, u, a, b are shown to drop out of the Q-cohomology or lambda-bracket; hbar is a deformation bookkeeping parameter, not fitted to data.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The theory admits a conserved fermionic charge Q and fermionic one-form Q satisfying Q^2=0, [Q,P]=0, and [Q,Q]=iP_i dy^i + iP_zbar dzbar (eqs. 2.2-2.5).
This defines the topological-holomorphic sector; it is verified for 3d N=2 and 4d N=2 theories in Sections 3 and 4, but is assumed as the starting point for the general construction.
domain assumption Locality of quantum field theory: the integration sphere S^{d+1} can be shrunk to arbitrarily small radius without changing the Q-cohomology class, and products of operators at distinct points are well-defined.
Used throughout Section 2 to define secondary products and the lambda-bracket (eqs. 2.23, 2.26) and to prove the Leibniz rule.
domain assumption For 4d N=2 SCFTs, unitarity and conformal symmetry hold, so that the hermitian conjugate of Q is a conformal supercharge and harmonic states satisfy [Q,Q*]=D-J-R=0 (eq. 4.41).
Used in Section 4.2 to identify V^hbar with the vertex algebra of [7] and to argue surjectivity of the injection V^hbar to V in the unitary case.
standard math Poisson additivity theorem (Rozenblyum; Safronov [9]) is accepted.
Cited in the introduction as the mathematical underpinning of the physical realization.
standard math Dolbeault cohomology of C^n vanishes in positive degree (Poincare lemma), used to compute Q-cohomology for free chiral multiplets.
Invoked in Section 3.2 to simplify V to holomorphic sections.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Poisson vertex algebras in supersymmetric field theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOMYYDPK

@misc{pith2026190805791,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Poisson vertex algebras in supersymmetric field theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOMYYDPK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05791}
}

abstract

A large class of supersymmetric quantum field theories, including all theories with $\mathcal{N} = 2$ supersymmetry in three dimensions and theories with $\mathcal{N} = 2$ supersymmetry in four dimensions, possess topological-holomorphic sectors. We formulate Poisson vertex algebras in such topological-holomorphic sectors and discuss some examples. For a four-dimensional $\mathcal{N} = 2$ superconformal field theory, the associated Poisson vertex algebra is the classical limit of a vertex algebra generated by a subset of local operators of the theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Loop Corrected Supercharges from Holomorphic Anomalies
hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The complete one-loop supercharge for 4d Lagrangian SUSY gauge theories is derived in the holomorphic twist, packaged for N=4 SYM as a compact superfield formula.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[25]

Oh and J

J. Oh and J. Yagi, Chiral algebras from Ω -deformation, JHEP 08 (2019) 143 [1903.11123]

arXiv 2019
[6]

C. Beem, D. Ben-Zvi, M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte and A. Neitzke, Secondary products in supersymmetric ﬁeld theory , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e21 (2020) 1235–1310 [1809.00009]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020
[1]

Beilinson and V

A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld, Chiral algebras, vol. 51 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

work page 2004
[2]

Geometric interpretation of the Poisson structure in affine Toda field theories

B. Enriquez and E. Frenkel, Geometric interpretation of the Poisson structure in aﬃne T oda ﬁeld theories , Duke Math. J. 92 (1998) 459–495 [q-alg/9606023]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[3]

Frenkel and D

E. Frenkel and D. Ben-Zvi, Vertex algebras and algebraic curves , vol. 88 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second ed., 200 4. 10.1090/surv/088

doi:10.1090/surv/088
[4]

Witten, Topological quantum ﬁeld theory , Comm

E. Witten, Topological quantum ﬁeld theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353–386

work page 1988
[5]

Witten, Topological sigma models, Comm

E. Witten, Topological sigma models, Comm. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 411–449

work page 1988
[7]

C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli and B. C. v an Rees, Inﬁnite chiral symmetry in four dimensions , Comm. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1359–1433 [1312.5344]

arXiv 2015

Show all 34 references

[8]

Kac, Vertex algebras for beginners , vol

V. Kac, Vertex algebras for beginners , vol. 10 of University Lecture Series . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second ed., 1998. 10.1090 /ulect/010

1998
[9]

Safronov, Braces and Poisson additivity , Compos

P. Safronov, Braces and Poisson additivity , Compos. Math. 154 (2018) 1698–1745 [1611.09668]. – 28 –

2018 arXiv
[10]

Costello, T

K. Costello, T. Dimofte and D. Gaiotto, Boundary chiral algebras and holomorphic twists , 2005.00083

2005 arXiv
[11]

Gaiotto, N = 2 dualities, JHEP 08 (2012) 034 [0904.2715]

D. Gaiotto, N = 2 dualities, JHEP 08 (2012) 034 [0904.2715]

2012 arXiv
[12]

Gaiotto, G

D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation, Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 239–403 [0907.3987]

2013 arXiv
[13]

Terashima and M

Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki, SL(2 , R) Chern–Simons, Liouville, and gauge theory on duality walls , JHEP 08 (2011) 135 [1103.5748]

2011 arXiv
[14]

Terashima and M

Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki, Semiclassical analysis of the 3d/3d relation , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 026011 [1106.3066]

2013 arXiv
[15]

Dimofte, D

T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov, Gauge theories labelled by three-manifolds , Comm. Math. Phys. 325 (2014) 367 [1108.4389]

2014 arXiv
[16]

Dimofte, D

T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov, 3-manifolds and 3d indices , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013) 975 [1112.5179]

2013 arXiv
[17]

C´ ordova and S.-H

C. C´ ordova and S.-H. Shao, Schur indices, BPS particles, and Argyres–Douglas theorie s, JHEP 01 (2016) 040 [1506.00265]

2016 arXiv
[18]

Barakat, A

A. Barakat, A. De Sole and V. G. Kac, Poisson vertex algebras in the theory of Hamiltonian equations, Jpn. J. Math. 4 (2009) 141–252

2009
[19]

Kac, Introduction to vertex algebras, Poisson vertex algebras, and integrable Hamiltonian PDE, in Perspectives in Lie theory , vol

V. Kac, Introduction to vertex algebras, Poisson vertex algebras, and integrable Hamiltonian PDE, in Perspectives in Lie theory , vol. 19 of Springer INdAM Ser. , pp. 3–72. Springer, Cham, 2017. 1512.00821

2017 arXiv
[20]

Wess and J

J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and supergravity . Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, second ed., 1992

1992
[21]

C´ ordova, T

C. C´ ordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Multiplets of superconformal symmetry in diverse dimensions , JHEP 03 (2019) 163 [1612.00809]

2019 arXiv
[22]

Comments on vertex algebras for N = 2 SCFTs

C. Beem, “Comments on vertex algebras for N = 2 SCFTs.” Talk at String Math 2017, July 24–28, 2017

2017
[23]

4d N = 2 SCFTs and VOAs

C. Beem, “4d N = 2 SCFTs and VOAs.” Talk at Pollica Summer Workshop “Mathematical and Geometric Tools for Conformal Field Theories,” June 3–21, 2019

2019
[24]

Building VOAs out of Higgs branches

C. Beem, “Building VOAs out of Higgs branches.” Talk at String Mat h 2019, July 1–5, 2019

2019
[26]

Jeong, SCFT/VOA correspondence via Ω -deformation, JHEP 10 (2019) 171 [1904.00927]

S. Jeong, SCFT/VOA correspondence via Ω -deformation, JHEP 10 (2019) 171 [1904.00927]

2019 arXiv
[27]

C. Beem, W. Peelaers and L. Rastelli, Deformation quantization and superconformal symmetry in three dimensions , Comm. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 345–392 [1601.05378]

2017 arXiv
[28]

N. A. Nekrasov, Seiberg–Witten prepotential from instanton counting , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003) 831–864 , [ hep-th/0206161]

2003 arXiv
[29]

N. A. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Seiberg–Witten theory and random partitions , in The unity of mathematics , vol. 244 of Progr. Math., p. 525. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA,
[30]

Yagi, Ω -deformation and quantization , JHEP 08 (2014) 112 [1405.6714]

J. Yagi, Ω -deformation and quantization , JHEP 08 (2014) 112 [1405.6714]. – 29 –

2014 arXiv
[31]

Kapustin, Holomorphic reduction of N = 2 gauge theories, Wilson–’t Hooft operators, and S-duality, hep-th/0612119

A. Kapustin, Holomorphic reduction of N = 2 gauge theories, Wilson–’t Hooft operators, and S-duality, hep-th/0612119

arXiv
[32]

Beem and L

C. Beem and L. Rastelli, Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular diﬀe rential equations, JHEP 08 (2018) 114 [1707.07679]

2018 arXiv
[33]

C. Beem, C. Meneghelli and L. Rastelli, Free ﬁeld realizations from the Higgs branch , JHEP 09 (2019) 058 [1903.07624]

2019 arXiv
[34]

Rozansky and E

L. Rozansky and E. Witten, Hyper-K¨ ahler geometry and invariants of three-manifolds, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 3 (1997) 401 [hep-th/9612216]. – 30 –

1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Oh and J

J. Oh and J. Yagi, Chiral algebras from Ω -deformation, JHEP 08 (2019) 143 [1903.11123]

arXiv 2019

[2] [6]

C. Beem, D. Ben-Zvi, M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte and A. Neitzke, Secondary products in supersymmetric ﬁeld theory , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e21 (2020) 1235–1310 [1809.00009]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020

[3] [1]

Beilinson and V

A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld, Chiral algebras, vol. 51 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

work page 2004

[4] [2]

Geometric interpretation of the Poisson structure in affine Toda field theories

B. Enriquez and E. Frenkel, Geometric interpretation of the Poisson structure in aﬃne T oda ﬁeld theories , Duke Math. J. 92 (1998) 459–495 [q-alg/9606023]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998

[5] [3]

Frenkel and D

E. Frenkel and D. Ben-Zvi, Vertex algebras and algebraic curves , vol. 88 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second ed., 200 4. 10.1090/surv/088

doi:10.1090/surv/088

[6] [4]

Witten, Topological quantum ﬁeld theory , Comm

E. Witten, Topological quantum ﬁeld theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353–386

work page 1988

[7] [5]

Witten, Topological sigma models, Comm

E. Witten, Topological sigma models, Comm. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 411–449

work page 1988

[8] [7]

C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli and B. C. v an Rees, Inﬁnite chiral symmetry in four dimensions , Comm. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1359–1433 [1312.5344]

arXiv 2015