Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

The paper computes the complete one-loop corrections to the supercharge in four-dimensional Lagrangian supersymmetric gauge theories, and for N=4 SYM the result is a compact superfield identity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 17:50 UTC pith:JS3ZGI52

load-bearing objection A real computation with a genuinely compact N=4 payoff; the regulator scheme is an acknowledged soft spot, and the missing test is whether the resulting Q1-cohomology reproduces the known SO(7) lifts. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2512.07771 v3 pith:JS3ZGI52 submitted 2025-12-08 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA

Loop Corrected Supercharges from Holomorphic Anomalies

Kasia Budzik , Justin Kulp This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 81T6081T1381T18 PACS 11.30.Pb11.15.-q
keywords supersymmetryholomorphic twistL∞ algebrassupercharge correctionsKonishi anomalyN=4 super Yang-Millssemi-chiral ringone-loop anomalies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper works out, in the holomorphic twist, the full one-loop deformation of the supersymmetry supercharge for 4d N=1 Lagrangian gauge theories with arbitrary chiral matter and superpotential. It shows that this correction is a BRST anomaly captured by a higher L∞ bracket, and that the entire calculation reduces to a single universal triangle integral. In N=4 SYM the one-loop supercharge reorganizes into a compact superfield formula involving three Grassmann differences and derivatives of the superfield C. If correct, this determines which tree-level semi-chiral operators are lifted at one loop, i.e., which operators cease to be annihilated by the quantum supercharge.

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-loop supercharge Q1 in the holomorphic twist of 4d Lagrangian SUSY gauge theories is computed by the 3-ary L∞ bracket {I,I,O}0 evaluated in a Schwinger-parametrized regularization, and that for N=4 SYM it admits the local expression Q1(C^A(θ)C^B(θ′)) = -(κ/2) f^ACD f^BCE (θ1-θ'1)(θ2-θ'2)(θ3-θ'3) ∂_{˙α}C^D(θ) ∂^{˙α}C^E(θ′), where C is the twisted superfield. This constitutes the complete one-loop correction, meaning it fixes, to first order in perturbation theory, which pairs of fields get renormalized and which semi-chiral operators remain Q-closed.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the L∞ conformal algebra of the free holomorphic theory, whose higher λ-brackets {O1,...,Ok}0 are computed by Feynman diagrams with the Bochner-Martinelli propagator. Loop corrections to the supercharge are the higher brackets with the interaction I repeated: Q_n O = 1/(n+1)! {I,...,I,O}0. At one loop only the triangle Laman graph contributes, and all its contributions are controlled by a single master integral I[λ;z] that becomes a differential operator acting on fields; the paper evaluates this integral in a Schwinger-parameter scheme and converts it to explicit formulas for Q1 on fields and derivatives.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the one-loop supercharge with the 3-ary bracket {I,I,O}0 computed in a Schwinger-parameter scheme is assumed to give the physical, scheme-independent loop correction; if a different regulator changes which operators are lifted, the central claim fails.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop supercharge for the same theory using an alternative UV regularization (e.g., Feynman parameters or a momentum cutoff) and check whether the lifted operators change; in particular, verify for pure N=1 SYM that the pairing of the A, B, C towers is scheme-independent, and for N=4 SYM with SO(7) that the known one-loop lift of a fortuitous operator is reproduced.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The one-loop supercharge acts on pairs of fields and does not satisfy the Leibniz rule on normal-ordered products, so quantum corrections generically mix operators of different lengths.
  • In pure N=1 SYM the correction pairs the A_n and B_n towers of single-trace operators into Q1-exact combinations, leaving only the C_n tower in the quantum-corrected cohomology.
  • In N=4 SYM, the planar-limit single-trace cohomology (symmetrized products of γ fields) is Q1-closed, so the infinite-N spectrum is unchanged at one loop.
  • The Wess-Zumino consistency condition forces Q1^2 + {Q0,Q2} = 0, so a non-trivial two-loop correction must exist.
  • The explicit formulas, including action on derivatives, are given in a form ready for symbolic computation, enabling direct checks on small gauge groups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave implicit that if the one-loop supercharge is scheme-dependent, the set of lifted operators may change with the regulator; a scheme-independent formulation would require identifying an observable, such as the cohomology of a gauge-invariant ring, that does not depend on this choice.
  • The compact N=4 formula suggests an underlying algebraic deformation of the Lie algebra cohomology differential; the paper notes this as an open problem, and one could test whether the deformation corresponds to a homotopy Lie algebra structure on the twisted fields.
  • A natural extension of the technique would apply the same triangle master integral to other dimensions and twists, potentially yielding one-loop supercharges for 3d or 2d twisted theories.
  • A concrete test: repeat the one-loop computation in a different regularization scheme, such as Feynman parameters or dimensional reduction, and compare which operators are lifted; if the lifted set differs, the scheme dependence is physical and the central claim would need refinement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the one-loop correction Q1 to the nilpotent supercharge in the holomorphic twist of four-dimensional Lagrangian supersymmetric gauge theories, following the L∞-bracket formalism of the authors' previous work. The main technical tool is a universal triangle master integral, reviewed in Appendix A, from which the action of Q1 on all quadratic combinations of twisted fields is obtained in Section 3.1, including vector multiplets, arbitrary chiral matter, and a superpotential. For pure N=1, N=2, and N=4 SYM the results are repackaged into compact superfield expressions, with the N=4 result advertised as eq. (1.10)/(3.69). The paper also gives an argument that in the planar limit of SU(N) N=4 SYM the infinite-N single-trace cohomology is unchanged at one loop, while leaving the finite-N question open.

Significance. If the computed Q1 is correct and scheme-independent, this is a valuable result: it provides the first complete one-loop deformation of the supercharge in the holomorphic twist, and it directly constrains which classical semi-chiral operators survive at one loop. The computation is carried out carefully: the master integral is reproduced in Appendix A, the derivative action is spelled out in Appendix B with a combinatorial derivation in Appendix C, and one component (3.65) matches the independent result [49]. The compact superfield form (3.69) is elegant and likely to be useful. However, the advertised central formula has an internal normalization/sign inconsistency with the component expressions, and the physical scheme-dependence of the Schwinger-parameter regulator is not yet resolved; both points must be addressed before the result can be accepted as stated.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.1; eqs. (3.15)-(3.19), (3.23)-(3.25)] The paper states the one-loop supercharge for arbitrary chiral matter and a general superpotential, but the derivation of the non-adjoint formulas (3.15)-(3.19) is not shown; only the adjoint cubic case is derived in detail (Appendix C). While the Laman-graph argument plausibly ensures completeness, the reader cannot check the representation-dependent color factors and signs without repeating the computation. Please provide at least a schematic derivation of the non-adjoint formulas, or state explicitly that they follow by the same contraction rules as the adjoint case, so that the completeness claim is verifiable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1.10) vs Eq. (3.69)] The introduction writes (1.10) with a coefficient -1/4 and no κ, while (3.69) has -κ/2. If these are the same formula with κ=1/2, say so explicitly; otherwise the mismatch is confusing and should be fixed.
  2. [§2.2.2] In the display after eq. (2.22), the sentence “We then study how the interaction deforms...” appears as a paragraph break; the logical connection to the preceding display should be smoothed.
  3. [Footnotes 6-7] The text says in the main body that Q1 does not square to zero, while footnote 6 clarifies that it does square to zero on Q0-cohomology. Please make this domain distinction in the main text as well, to avoid apparent contradiction.
  4. [§3.4.1] The planar-limit argument that all psl(3|3) descendants of γ^I traces are Q1-closed would benefit from a one-line explanation of why Q1 commutes with the tree-level psl(3|3) generators on Q0-cohomology; currently this is asserted without proof.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Q1 is obtained by an explicit, theory-independent master integral computation (reproduced in Appendix A), with an external cross-check to [49]; self-citations to prior framework are load-bearing but independently derived, not circular.

full rationale

The central claim—the one-loop supercharge (1.10)/(3.69)—is not derived by definitional identification with an input. It is produced by evaluating the 3-ary bracket Q1 = (1/2){I,I,O}_0 (eq. 2.24) using the one-loop triangle master integral I_[λ;z], which is recomputed explicitly in Appendix A (eqs. A.10–A.12) rather than merely cited. The component formulas (3.63)–(3.68) follow from substituting the group-theoretic structure constants and the N=4 superpotential into the general one-loop actions of Section 3.1. No parameter is fitted to the target output; the only inputs are general formalism and a universal integral. The compact superfield forms (3.36), (3.45), and (3.69) are reorganizations of independently obtained component results, not ansatze imposed at the start. The paper's reliance on [16–18] is self-citational, but those works are used as general perturbative/QFT machinery, not as an unverified uniqueness theorem, and the key integral is reproduced in this paper. There is also an external benchmark: eq. (3.65) is explicitly noted as having been computed in [49]. The flagged scheme dependence (footnote 7: Q1^2 + {Q0,Q2} = 0, so Q1 does not square to zero) and the open finite-N BPS question (§3.4.1) are substantive physical caveats about whether this regulator gives the physical loop correction, but they are correctness risks, not circular reductions: the paper does not use its conclusions as premises. No specific step equates an input with an output by construction, so no circular step is identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central computation has no fitted parameters and postulates no new entities. It rests instead on a sequence of domain assumptions (twist equivalence, L∞ bracket expansion, Laman graph selection, and a specific regularization scheme), most of which are taken from the authors' earlier papers rather than independently verified here.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The holomorphic twist cohomology is isomorphic to the original supersymmetric theory's semi-chiral ring.
    Section 2.1; relies on prior work [15,24] to identify Q-cohomology with the twisted theory.
  • domain assumption Loop corrections to Q are given by the higher L∞ brackets in (1.6)/(2.22).
    Section 2.2.2; derived in [16,17,18], not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Only Laman graphs contribute to the higher brackets; the one-loop correction is the triangle diagram.
    Section 2.3; a result from [18] on form-degree constraints.
  • domain assumption The Schwinger-parametrized master integral (2.43) is finite and yields the anomaly in a well-defined scheme.
    Section 2.3 and Appendix A; the scheme-dependence is acknowledged in footnote 7.
  • standard math The Bochner-Martinelli propagator and Wick contraction rules are valid for the holomorphic field theory.
    Section 2.3; standard harmonic analysis, from [17,18].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25410 in / 10760 out tokens · 93509 ms · 2026-08-03T17:50:19.404795+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe the loop corrections to supercharges in supersymmetric quantum field theories using the holomorphic twist formalism. We begin by reviewing the relation between supercharge corrections and the "twice-generalized" Konishi anomaly, which corrects the semi-chiral ring. In the holomorphic twist, these corrections appear as BRST anomalies and are computed using the higher operations of an underlying $L_\infty$ conformal algebra. We then apply this formalism to obtain the complete one-loop corrections to the supercharge of four-dimensional Lagrangian supersymmetric gauge theories, including $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM, where it admits a remarkably compact expression in terms of superfields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Poisson Vertex Algebra of Seiberg-Witten Theory

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An explicit Poisson vertex algebra A is proposed as the perturbative holomorphic-topological observables of pure SU(2) Seiberg-Witten theory; its series refines the Schur index and a differential Q_inst is introduced ...

  2. Two roads to fortuity in ABJM theory

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Enumerates 244 fortuitous operators in ABJM theory and identifies a truncation matching the BMN subsector of N=4 SYM to lift an infinite tower of representatives.

  3. Mass-Flow Invariance of $Q$-Cohomology in BMN Matrix Quantum Mechanics

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Q-cohomology in BMN matrix QM is mass-flow invariant via a similarity transformation of the nilpotent supercharge component.

  4. Super-Chevalley Restriction and Relative Lie Algebra Cohomology over the 2|3 Algebra

    math.RT 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The 3|2 super-Chevalley restriction map fails to be an isomorphism for so(7) due to a non-Cartan class; explicit fortuitous classes counter stable-image expectations for sl(2) and so(7); relative cohomologies of (so7,...

  5. Quantum black hole cohomologies

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In SU(2) maximal SYM, certain classical fortuitous cohomologies stay unlifted at one loop while many heavier core ones are lifted, and classical entropy exceeds protected-state entropy by ≥1.2% in the Cardy limit.

  6. Quantum black hole cohomologies

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the SU(2) maximal SYM theory, some fortuitous cohomologies are lifted by 1-loop corrections while the lightest and hairy versions are not, yielding at least 1.2% higher entropy for classical cohomologies than for s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 62 linked inside Pith · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Seiberg,Exact results on the space of vacua of four-dimensional SUSY gauge theories, Phys

    N. Seiberg,Exact results on the space of vacua of four-dimensional SUSY gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6857–6863, [hep-th/9402044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  2. [2]

    Cachazo, M

    F. Cachazo, M. R. Douglas, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten,Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory, JHEP12(2002) 071, [hep-th/0211170]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    M. F. Sohnius and P. C. West,Conformal Invariance in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 245

    1981

  4. [4]

    de Wit, P

    B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers, and A. Van Proeyen,Lagrangians of N=2 Supergravity - Matter Systems, Nucl. Phys. B255(1985) 569–608

    1985

  5. [5]

    Seiberg,Supersymmetry and Nonperturbative beta Functions, Phys

    N. Seiberg,Supersymmetry and Nonperturbative beta Functions, Phys. Lett. B206(1988) 75–80

    1988

  6. [6]

    Seiberg,Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems, Phys

    N. Seiberg,Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems, Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 469–475, [hep-ph/9309335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    Kutasov,A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories, Phys

    D. Kutasov,A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B351(1995) 230–234, [hep-th/9503086]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    Kutasov and A

    D. Kutasov and A. Schwimmer,On duality in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 354(1995) 315–321, [hep-th/9505004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  9. [9]

    Kutasov, A

    D. Kutasov, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg,Chiral rings, singularity theory and electric - magnetic duality, Nucl. Phys. B459(1996) 455–496, [hep-th/9510222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  10. [10]

    S. Lee, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani, and N. Seiberg,Three point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N=4 SYM at large N, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 697–718, [hep-th/9806074]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  12. [12]

    Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,arXiv:0707.3702

    C. Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,arXiv:0707.3702

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Applications of the Superconformal Index for Protected Operators and q-Hypergeometric Identities to N=1 Dual Theories, Nucl. Phys. B818(2009) 137–178, [arXiv:0801.4947]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Eager, I

    R. Eager, I. Saberi, and J. Walcher,Nilpotence varieties, Annales Henri Poincare22(2021), no. 4 1319–1376, [arXiv:1807.03766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Elliott, P

    C. Elliott, P. Safronov, and B. R. Williams,A taxonomy of twists of supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory, Selecta Math.28(2022), no. 4 73, [arXiv:2002.10517]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Budzik, D

    K. Budzik, D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, B. R. Williams, J. Wu, and M. Yu,Semi-chiral operators in 4d N= 1 gauge theories, JHEP05(2024) 245, [arXiv:2306.01039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, and J. Wu,Higher operations in perturbation theory, JHEP05(2025) 230, [arXiv:2403.13049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Budzik, D

    K. Budzik, D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, J. Wu, and M. Yu,Feynman diagrams in four-dimensional holomorphic theories and the Operatope, JHEP07(2023) 127, [arXiv:2207.14321]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Bomans, N

    P. Bomans, N. Garner, B. R. Williams, and J. Wu,Unravelling the Holomorphic Twist II: Anomalies and Extended Supersymmetry,arXiv:2509.16737

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    Konishi,Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation of Some Composite Operators in SQCD, Phys

    K. Konishi,Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation of Some Composite Operators in SQCD, Phys. Lett. B135(1984) 439–444

    1984

  21. [21]

    Konishi and K.-i

    K.-i. Konishi and K.-i. Shizuya,Functional Integral Approach to Chiral Anomalies in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Nuovo Cim. A90(1985) 111

    1985

  22. [22]

    Z. Gui, M. Wang, and B. R. Williams,Higher-dimensional Chiral Algebras in the Jouanolou Model,arXiv:2510.26608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Costello,Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian,arXiv:1303.2632

    K. Costello,Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian,arXiv:1303.2632

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Saberi and B

    I. Saberi and B. R. Williams,Twisted characters and holomorphic symmetries, Lett. Math. Phys.110(2020), no. 10 2779–2853, [arXiv:1906.04221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Faonte, B

    G. Faonte, B. Hennion, and M. Kapranov,Higher kac–moody algebras and moduli spaces of g-bundles, Advances in Mathematics346(2019) 389–466, [arXiv:1701.01368]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Gwilliam and B

    O. Gwilliam and B. R. Williams,Higher Kac–Moody algebras and symmetries of holomorphic field theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.25(2021), no. 1 129–239, [arXiv:1810.06534]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Saberi and B

    I. Saberi and B. R. Williams,Superconformal Algebras and Holomorphic Field Theories, Annales Henri Poincare24(2023), no. 2 541–604, [arXiv:1910.04120]. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Bomans and J

    P. Bomans and J. Wu,Unravelling the Holomorphic Twist: Central Charges, Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024), no. 12 290, [arXiv:2311.04304]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    B. R. Williams,The local cohomology of vector fields,arXiv:2405.05174

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Scheinpflug,The semi-chiral ring of supersymmetricϕ 4 theory as a representation, arXiv:2410.12980

    J. Scheinpflug,The semi-chiral ring of supersymmetricϕ 4 theory as a representation, arXiv:2410.12980

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Chen and J

    H. Chen and J. Liniado,Infinite Dimensional Topological-Holomorphic Symmetry in Three-Dimensions,arXiv:2507.01858

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Loday and D

    J.-L. Loday and D. G. Quillen,Cyclic homology and the lie algebra homology of matrices, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici59(1984) 565–591

    1984

  33. [33]

    B. L. Tsygan,The homology of matrix lie algebras over rings and the hochschild homology, Russian Mathematical Surveys38(1983) 198 – 199

    1983

  34. [34]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Words to describe a black hole, JHEP02(2023) 109, [arXiv:2209.06728]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park,The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2), JHEP09 (2024) 029, [arXiv:2209.12696]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park,Towards quantum black hole microstates, JHEP 11(2023) 175, [arXiv:2304.10155]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 091 (2025)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Budzik, H

    K. Budzik, H. Murali, and P. Vieira,Following Black Hole States,arXiv:2306.04693

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee,Finite N black hole cohomologies, JHEP12(2024) 029, [arXiv:2312.16443]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, arXiv:2402.10129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    de Mello Koch, M

    R. de Mello Koch, M. Kim, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee,Brane-fused black hole operators, JHEP 07(2025) 216, [arXiv:2412.08695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Gaikwad, T

    A. Gaikwad, T. Kibe, S. van Leuven, and K. Mathieson,To gauge or to double gauge? Matrix models, global symmetry, and black hole cohomologies,arXiv:2512.02103

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Chang, Y

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang,Fortuity in SYK models, JHEP08(2025) 003, [arXiv:2412.06902]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Chen,Fortuity with a single matrix,arXiv:2511.00790

    Y. Chen,Fortuity with a single matrix,arXiv:2511.00790

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang,Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,arXiv:2501.05448

    arXiv

  45. [45]

    S. Kim, J. Lee, S. Lee, and H. Oh,BPS phases and fortuity in higher spin holography, arXiv:2511.03105

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    Chang and H

    C.-M. Chang and H. Zhang,Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT, arXiv:2511.23294

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    Belin, P

    A. Belin, P. Singh, R. Vadala, and A. Zaffaroni,Fortuity in ABJM,arXiv:2512.04146

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Violation of S-duality in classicalQ-cohomology, arXiv:2510.24008

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Choi and E

    J. Choi and E. Lee,Konishi lifts a black hole,arXiv:2511.09519. – 29 –

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    Grant, P

    L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla,Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations, JHEP05(2008) 049, [arXiv:0803.4183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Lee, R. Raj, and S. Tomar,Probing Non-Graviton Spectra inN= 4SYM via BMN truncation and S-Duality,arXiv:2506.13887

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Chang and X

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin,1/16 BPS states inN=4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013), no. 10 106005, [arXiv:1305.6314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees,Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015), no. 3 1359–1433, [arXiv:1312.5344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and J. Wu,On 1 8 -BPS black holes and the chiral algebra ofN= 4 SYM, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28(2024), no. 7 2431–2489, [arXiv:2310.20086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Axelrod and I

    S. Axelrod and I. M. Singer,Chern-Simons perturbation theory, in International Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, pp. 3–45, 1991.hep-th/9110056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991

  56. [56]

    B. R. Williams,Renormalization for holomorphic field theories, Communications in Mathematical Physics374(2020), no. 3 1693–1742, [arXiv:1809.02661]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov,Instanton Effects in Supersymmetric Theories, Nucl. Phys. B229(1983) 407

    1983

  58. [58]

    K. Hori, S. Katz, A. Klemm, R. Pandharipande, R. Thomas, C. Vafa, R. Vakil, and E. Zaslow, Mirror symmetry, vol. 1 of Clay mathematics monographs. AMS, Providence, USA, 2003

    2003

  59. [59]

    Witten,Chiral ring of Sp(N) and SO(N) supersymmetric gauge theory in four-dimensions, hep-th/0302194

    E. Witten,Chiral ring of Sp(N) and SO(N) supersymmetric gauge theory in four-dimensions, hep-th/0302194

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Etingof and V

    P. Etingof and V. Kac,On the Cachazo-Douglas-Seiberg-Witten conjecture for simple Lie algebras,math/0305175

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Cederwall and G

    M. Cederwall and G. Ferretti,The Chiral Ring of D=4, N=1 SYM with Exceptional Gauge Groups, Fortsch. Phys.72(2024), no. 5 2400027, [arXiv:2311.12119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Dorey, T

    N. Dorey, T. J. Hollowood, V. V. Khoze, and M. P. Mattis,The Calculus of many instantons, Phys. Rept.371(2002) 231–459, [hep-th/0206063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  63. [63]

    Argurio, G

    R. Argurio, G. Ferretti, and R. Heise,An Introduction to supersymmetric gauge theories and matrix models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19(2004) 2015–2078, [hep-th/0311066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  64. [64]

    Seiberg,Adding fundamental matter to ‘Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory’, JHEP01(2003) 061, [hep-th/0212225]

    N. Seiberg,Adding fundamental matter to ‘Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory’, JHEP01(2003) 061, [hep-th/0212225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  65. [65]

    Tachikawa,Lectures on 4d N=1 dynamics and related topics,arXiv:1812.08946

    Y. Tachikawa,Lectures on 4d N=1 dynamics and related topics,arXiv:1812.08946

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    T. T. Dumitrescu and N. Seiberg,Supercurrents and Brane Currents in Diverse Dimensions, JHEP07(2011) 095, [arXiv:1106.0031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, and Z. Komargodski,The Geometry of Supersymmetric Partition Functions, JHEP01(2014) 124, [arXiv:1309.5876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, and Z. Komargodski,From Rigid Supersymmetry to Twisted Holomorphic Theories, Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 8 085006, [arXiv:1407.2598]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    T. T. Dumitrescu,An introduction to supersymmetric field theories in curved space, J. Phys. A 50(2016), no. 44 443005, [arXiv:1608.02957]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Yonekura,Notes on Operator Equations of Supercurrent Multiplets and Anomaly Puzzle in Supersymmetric Field Theories, JHEP09(2010) 049, [arXiv:1004.1296]

    K. Yonekura,Notes on Operator Equations of Supercurrent Multiplets and Anomaly Puzzle in Supersymmetric Field Theories, JHEP09(2010) 049, [arXiv:1004.1296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Scheinpflug, M

    J. Scheinpflug, M. Schnabl, and J. Voˇ smera,Observables of boundary RG flows from string field theory,arXiv:2510.07155

    arXiv

  72. [72]

    Witten and B

    E. Witten and B. Zwiebach,Algebraic structures and differential geometry in 2-D string theory, Nucl. Phys. B377(1992) 55–112, [hep-th/9201056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  73. [73]

    B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman,New perspectives on the BRST algebraic structure of string theory, Commun. Math. Phys.154(1993) 613–646, [hep-th/9211072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  74. [74]

    Getzler,Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras and two-dimensional topological field theories, Commun

    E. Getzler,Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras and two-dimensional topological field theories, Commun. Math. Phys.159(1994) 265–285, [hep-th/9212043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  75. [75]

    C. Beem, D. Ben-Zvi, M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte, and A. Neitzke,Secondary products in supersymmetric field theory, Annales Henri Poincare21(2020), no. 4 1235–1310, [arXiv:1809.00009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Oh and J

    J. Oh and J. Yagi,Poisson vertex algebras in supersymmetric field theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 110(2020), no. 8 2245–2275, [arXiv:1908.05791]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Garner and N

    N. Garner and N. M. Paquette,Mathematics of String Dualities, PoST ASI2021(2023) 007, [arXiv:2204.01914]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and E. Witten,Algebra of the Infrared: String Field Theoretic Structures in MassiveN= (2,2)Field Theory In Two Dimensions,arXiv:1506.04087

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Wang,Feynman Graph Integrals onC d, Commun

    M. Wang,Feynman Graph Integrals onC d, Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025), no. 5 116, [arXiv:2401.08113]

    arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Balduf and D

    P.-H. Balduf and D. Gaiotto,Combinatorial proof of a non-renormalization theorem, JHEP05 (2025) 120, [arXiv:2408.03192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.