Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

IPGuard: Protecting Intellectual Property of Deep Neural Networks via Fingerprinting the Classification Boundary

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.12903 v5 pith:VPII5RIB submitted 2019-10-28 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords classifieripguardmodelownerboundaryclassificationclassifiersintellectual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A deep neural network (DNN) classifier represents a model owner's intellectual property as training a DNN classifier often requires lots of resource. Watermarking was recently proposed to protect the intellectual property of DNN classifiers. However, watermarking suffers from a key limitation: it sacrifices the utility/accuracy of the model owner's classifier because it tampers the classifier's training or fine-tuning process. In this work, we propose IPGuard, the first method to protect intellectual property of DNN classifiers that provably incurs no accuracy loss for the classifiers. Our key observation is that a DNN classifier can be uniquely represented by its classification boundary. Based on this observation, IPGuard extracts some data points near the classification boundary of the model owner's classifier and uses them to fingerprint the classifier. A DNN classifier is said to be a pirated version of the model owner's classifier if they predict the same labels for most fingerprinting data points. IPGuard is qualitatively different from watermarking. Specifically, IPGuard extracts fingerprinting data points near the classification boundary of a classifier that is already trained, while watermarking embeds watermarks into a classifier during its training or fine-tuning process. We extensively evaluate IPGuard on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet datasets. Our results show that IPGuard can robustly identify post-processed versions of the model owner's classifier as pirated versions of the classifier, and IPGuard can identify classifiers, which are not the model owner's classifier nor its post-processed versions, as non-pirated versions of the classifier.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 20 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Ownership Verification of DNN Models Using White-Box Adversarial Attacks with Specified Probability Manipulation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors introduce I-FDGSM, an iterative adversarial attack that sets a target class probability to a specified value while keeping the true class dominant, and use it to verify whether a cloud model is the original model.

Pith tools